This guy is clueless.
the 'fake psychologist' badger tells people they 'seem upset'
you can tell it's all a put on by the choice of picture.
calling out your psyops. you use the same phrases I use because that's all you can do.
you pretend you understand about 'intelligence' and name call.
there isn't anything about you that worth responding to but just to tag you as being what you say I am.
it bothers you that people trip up your hateful badgering of others and your psychological operations here.
tell your bosses you failed.
are there auditors in the Minnesota National Guard?
to take attention off of billions in fraud?
the term 'legal observer' is a fiction that is upheld by activist judges. They have no status and no immunity from arrest.
they are merely there at the behest of someone paying them to be there or assigning them there. The idea that they are 'legal' is a fiction and they thus should not be called 'legal observers' and some other term should be used to describe them.
calling them 'legal observers' merely aides the fiction that they have some kind of autual role other than being there when bad stuff happens. They are sent in and have a clear political agenda.
what can they be called to defuse the fake name 'legal observer'? 'obstructionist impeders of legal enforcement'?
obstructionist impeders mascurading as witnesses?
anyone got a better term for them.
People ought not call them 'legal observers' as their role is obstruction, and in this case it seems interference with law enforcement.
Marxists love their martyrs. That's why they encourage people to be stupid.
they use them as props.
does the page say who encouraged her to go there and be an impeder of law enforcement?
The Federal Government should give the National Guard a free license to audit all Governmental expenditures.
makes no mention of her being a so-called 'legal observer'
they are not anything more than hirelings of 'progressive' groups. They have NO LEGAL standing. They are not created by any legal authority. They are PAID operators.
They have no creed or professional license, they are merely a fiction of the progressive left. And, as we can see, they are often biased and do not actually follow the law.
there is nothing 'legal' about them other than they are citizens and perhaps witnesses. They have NO legal protection and their title is just an arbitrary one crafted to give the fiction that they are some how part of the Judicial process.
No legislatures have ever given them any legal immunity and they are no more protected than anyone else in the same vicinity.
they are a fiction of the progressive left and it's propped up by rulings of activist judges who maintain that fiction by using that title.
This news is rather old, anon.
they give the name 'legal observer' to try to give them 'the color of law'.
I had to tell the google AI to describe it without calling her a 'legal observer' and at first it didn't do it.
But the google AI was clear: they are a fabrication of the left, the title is bestowed by the progressives on people who they place at the scene perhaps for other purposes.
Using that as a title for her perpetuates the fiction that she had some legal reason for being there, which she didn't. It's important that the term NOT be used by anyone but the progressives so that it doesn't confuse people who aren't as clued in to as what is really going on.