Anons, did you see the latest in Cohen trial? Case stayed for <45 more days…

Court DENIES Cohen's Ex Parte Application for RestrainingOrder and CONTINUES the stay for forty-five (45) days.

A scheduling conference will be held on September 10, 2018 @ 8:30 a.m.

The parties shall file a joint 26(f) report fourteen (14) days priorto the scheduling conference. [Aug 27th?]

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Cohen's ("Mr. Cohen" or "Defendant") ExParte Application for a Restraining Order Against Plaintiff's Counsel, Michael Avenatti("Application"), filed June 14, 2018. Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford ("Ms. Clifford" or "Plaintiff")opposed the Application ("Opposition") on June 25, 2018. Defendant replied ("Reply") on July 2,2018. A hearing on the matter was held on July 27, 2018.For the following reasons, the CourtDENIES the Application.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/w9vs7ad14d80lzo/LA18CV02217-SJO-MO.pdf?dl=0

>>2409395

>What if Mueller is in reality (Our Guy) what if he is putting the Trump admin under scrutiny (for the same things HRC and other) are guilty of. Just to show how unjust our system is.

Plausible still. I have thought this many times. Setting the stage for what's to come. Think mirror.

>>2409396

More on Stormy Daniels vs. Cohen

Judge acknowledges 'Stormy' may have to return $130,000 Cohen payment

"Defendant points out that "Plaintiff currently has pending a Motion for Expedited Trial," whichwould create the potential of a jury trial within the next few months. (See Mot. to Expedite JuryTrial, ECF No. 29.) If Plaintiff's motion is granted, however, the trial would be on the very narrowissue of the validity of an arbitration clause in an agreement between Mr. Trump, Ms. Clifford, andEssential Consultants, LLC ("EC"), Mr. Cohen's company. (See generally Mot to Expedite JuryTrial.) "

"If Ms. Clifford succeeds in invalidating the agreement between herself, Mr. Trump, and EC, Mr. Cohen suffers no identifiable loss.1 In fact, EC may even be entitled to a return of the $130,000 allegedly paid by Mr. Cohen to Ms. Daniels on its behalf. (See First Amended Complaint ("FAC") ¶ 27, ECF No. 14.) "

https://www.dropbox.com/s/w9vs7ad14d80lzo/LA18CV02217-SJO-MO.pdf?dl=0

>>2409566

>It'd be funny if she voluntarily dismisses the case after being told that heh.

One of my theories is that this has all been for optics…part of the show. Left better 'buckle up' …the political left who are cheering the "extreme" investigation measures taken against President Trump (like raiding a lawyer's office). That is all "precedent" for when Trump wants to do it to (((them)))).