>Q predicted what would happen to Iran years ago, time travel is fun.
Time travel? Q also said that your ability was overestimated.
>How can I be the news now efficiently?
Pay, or pay more. You can pay Jim at isitwetyet.com
https://shop.isitwetyet.com/
>that wasn't a message for anons.
Anons missed the Captain Green/Waddesdon Operation. Anons were directly addressed by Q regarding the overestimation.
She was given a legal order to turn off the vehicle and failed to comply.
>>legal order
>Who told you that?
It is evident in several of the videos available. A uniformed law enforcement officer exited a law enforcement vehicle with active lights, approached the driver's side door, and issued a lawful verbal order to the driver through the open window to turn off the vehicle. The order was repeated. The driver failed to comply with a lawful order.
>And what gave him authority to do so?
Ultimately the authority derives from the United Stated Constitution, Anon. The driver defied the US Constitution by defying a lawful order from a Federal Law Enforcement Officer.
She thought it was a game.
Annoying men with guns for sport doesn't seem rational.
She was a woman.
She thought the game was about emotions.
>Who told you an executive order is above the law itself?
An executive order is the law. As someone once said 'Stroke of the pen, law of the land.' You may complain, as many have done so before you, but you will exhaust yourself through futility.
In your righteous imagination you are the only one who successfully interprets the US Constitution. Unfortunately for you, others have also been legally empowered to interpret the US Constitution. You make some fair points, but you are in the minority, powerless, and reduced to posting on an anonymous forum. Many here love and respect law enforcement and are grateful for the blanket of protection they provide.
I'm relieved that you have made your views known to law enforcement, Anon. Next time you get pulled over explain to the officer that you are 'traveling', not 'driving', and therefore do not need a driver's license.
>She was observing and protesting law enforcement action, which is her right.
She was given a lawful verbal command by the law enforcement personnel she was observing. She ignored the repeated lawful verbal commands - before a shot was fired, while the car was in reverse, while a law enforcement officer had a hand on her car, while her window was open, she ignored a lawful verbal command.
>those calling out domestic enemies for their crimes.
Those delusional individuals posting self-righteous propaganda online on an anonymous board should also be included in your assessment.