I love how many morans think that has no bearing because it's not in the constitution.
>She should have known to not go near the hot pot on the stove
You forget… he ordered her to. Otherwise they would claim she's interfering
Who told you they had lawful authority to order her from the car?
Stalking requires a repeated course of conduct targeting an individual and that serves no legitimate interest. You can't turn a constitutional right to follow/record/verbally oppose and challenge law enforcement into "harassment" or "Stalking" which have actual definitions under the law.
Try again.
Who told you they had lawful authority to order her from the car?
*legitimate purpose not interest, sorry.
I don't hate the people I hate the crime. I have no tattoos and I've never been in trouble with the law in my life.
Law enforcement are domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States.
Now again I ask… who told you they had lawful authority to order her from the car?
She didn't, nor did she try. She tried to drive away as they unlawfully surrounded her and unlawfully ordered her from the car.
Enjoy the coming hailstorm. It's biblical.
Yes, you are.
>We, the PEOPLE.
>We, the PEOPLE.
>We, the PEOPLE.
>THERE WILL COME A TIME THEY WILL NOT BE SAFE WALKING DOWN THE STREET.
>We will not be held hostage.
>SKY EVENT.
>WWG1WGA.
>Q+
>And there fell upon men a great hail out of heaven, every stone about the weight of a talent: and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail; for the plague thereof was exceeding great.
Who told you policy is law?
What is required to detain someone?
What crime was she accused of?
>What do you mean by that?
Exactly what I said. I was responding to below
>Those people have 20x20 inch tattoos of the text ACAB on their backs
You mean the "bitch" who tried to drive away when told to before she was unlawfully ordered out of the car?
I know it's what they taught.
Cops should be asking themselves who wants them taking a fall, and I don't mean the idiot bluehairs
She was told to drive, she tried to drive, she was unlawfully killed by a fucking coward domestic enemy in a badge.
No, she was told to drive, it's clear in the video, then others unlawfully ordered her from the car as she did so.
He's a fucking coward and will always be remembered as a fucking coward, just like every coward with a badge yelling "officer safety!!!"
Kek no, any law that violates rights is void and it's literally a crime… one that goes unenforced… to deprive a right under color of ANY law, statute ordinance, custom etc. Even laws "on the books" signed by the president are VOID if they violate rights and the domestic terrorists who enforce them are committing a crime.
It's funny to me people don't realize the constitution was created to FUCK the boot and the bootlickers lol
Unlawfully ordered, and one did tell her to drive before that.
She didn't try to kill anyone… she clearly wasn't angry… he was. No matter how you try to spin it, he's a fucking coward.
What makes you think they had authority to order her from the car?
Notice how everything is left or right to you?
Divide and Rule.
I don't give a fuck about right and left, I care about rights and the constitution.
Divide and rule has worked well on you.
Oh here is not the only place I post. I post on EVERY police and law enforcement post I see on social media, and I will gladly tell anyone in person. Not everyone is too chickenshit to admit the Truth.
I have the right to self defense, as does every American, and they have the right to use force against an officer acting unlawfully to defend themselves.
He’s a domestic enemy
She was observing and protesting law enforcement action, which is her right.
You can't call it obstruction and harassment/stalking just because you want to, they have lawful definitions.
I am angry that domestic enemies who claim to be patriots either violate the peoples rights and US Constitution daily or turn a blind eye while others do. Yeah.
No one dares answer me, but I keep asking.
Who told them government courts get to "weigh government interest" against the right government is constitutionally forbidden from infringing upon?
EVERY member of government, cops, president, judges etc share in it's crimes. They prop it up.
She was a human and American citizen, and he had no lawful authority to arrest her, but she has a lawful right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest.
Ah yes, the "Sovereign citizen" movement counter op that you "attach" to those calling out domestic enemies for their crimes.
Voted R all my life.
Until I woke up and realize both "sides" are corrupt as fuck and I no longer consent to this lawless government.
Who told you it was lawful?
She was being unlawfully surrounded, issued opposing commands, and had done NOTHING unlawful to be detained or arrested for.
You do realize the hunters are now the hunted right?
No, it's lawful to use force against any law enforcement officer unlawfully abusing or arresting you… however it's YOUR conjecture that she tried to kill him. She tried to drive away as she was being surrounded.
Cowards always claim "I feared for my life" and so do the cowards who support them.
You might want to read what I was responding to kek.
>He was a human and American citizen