this clip of Scott Bessent is deadly! Lawfag jr. here .

I wish this clip started a few seconds before but this is what I have. hear his first few words. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT!

He is not auditing the banks to punish them.

This is criminal R I C O. He would not announce this unless he has already secured seizure of funds and assets.

In a criminal R I C O case, you have to prove a legit entity( bank in this case) was used in a criminal conspiracy to violate 2 or more specified crimes. If you want to seize all assets for the participants you have to file sealed for ex parte TRO but have 6 weeks to file a R I C O statement. R I C O is a BAD LAW! SCOTUS hates it with valid reason because it strips people of their 4th and 6th amendment rights BEFORE they have been charged or convicted. In order to get a seizure , you have to prove a civil conspiracy and likelihood of success with a R I C O statement and evidence that is clear and concise. ( higher burden than preponderance but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. This is all done without the other side knowing anything about it. You then get a freeze of all assets for anyone or any entity named. The people or entity find out when they try to pay for something and get denied. They find out their account has been frozen and they need to contact Homeland or whoever froze it.

If you pass a R I C O statement to secure freezing assets, then you most likely will win in trial . Courts don't freeze assets unless the evidence is compelling because if assets were wrongfully seized the damage to the person is grand. ( EX: seizing a million dollars could cost a billion in lawsuit) Scott Bessent came out and told, therefore, the seizing was approved by a judge. No way he came out publicly before seizing because they would move their money. Ilhan Omar's money has been seized and she now has to fight to get it back. All of the known fraudsters have had their money seized https://x.com/StandUpForTrmp/status/2010378585400619398

>>24108090 what do you mean by fraudulently auctioned? My post mainly referenced bank accounts, property, stocks, bonds ect…

>>24108112 the ownership of the bonds are transferred. but maybe we are talking past each other. civil forfeiture would include any bonds they purchased. If what you are talking about are city purchased bonds like a Tbill or federal bonds purchased by the city with fraudulent money then the City would have to be named in the R I C O scheme. The bonds would be seized as far as ownership. but ultimately the bonds would be paid out. If say Frey purchased it with dirty money he stole from feds, that money would be taken out of the proceeds but profit back into city account

>>24108177 not sure what bonds you are talking about in relation to this situation but I am genuinely interested in what risk factor you are concerned with. sometimes in fraud cases there is no ability to recoup money damages. bonds have low risk but they have risk that can be unrecoverable. Fraud vitiates everything is a nice sounding doctrine but it is not 100%. sometimes courts cannot address a problem and have to resolve itself as fixing what it can. sounds shitty but it is what it is. fraud undoes (rescinds) then as best it can makes whole without granting a win fall. emphasis on not granting a win fall. In my mind as I report this, I am thinking about physical and concrete assets. I am not aware of bond purchases being part of this MN scheme of taxpayer. I wish to understand your concerns but I am in a different headspace right now. I am not understanding your concern on a concrete level and really want to because it seems I am overlooking something and I hate when I do that

>>24108260 thank you for clarifying. no the federal government is not complicit in the crime but that doesn't help your concern. the federal government along with state or city are the legit entity being used in the commission of a R I C O crime. let's take MN as an example because that is the civil forfeiture we have reason to believe has already happened. if tbills were purchased with fraudulent money ( I am not a bondfag so maybe there is a shorter term bond I don't know about) the tbills ownership would be seized. the purchaser , if involved in the civil conspiracy, would lose access to them until the final adjudication of the case. but while waiting for you to give clarity I did think of a way bonds could be of concern here. city and state bonds in MN would not be a safe investment right now. federal government funds are 35 % of their budget. Clearly the State cannot continue on the same path they have been on with 35% of their funds under threat. Some cities have faced the brink of bankruptcy before. 35 % of a state's budget is nearing that territory. State bond investment in blue states is way too risky for the low payout!

>>24108417 that is Trump's view on everything. He gets it! What I don't get is why he is excluding the Arab States. Why just USA Russia and China? There is a 4th power unless Trump thinks he has them with us.

>>24108447 meant in the scheme of World power. Arab Countries are still a power

>>24108466 they have power in numbers even if the oil power is reduced. just saying I am not sure why Trump ignores their existence as a power

they haven't used military to attempt domination but they did export their radicals World wide. I guess Trump is just looking at military threat as it relates to weaponry

>>24108491 i meant to tag >>24108482

>>24108508

I meant currently. They are not using military for world domination. they are however using migration and that is worse in many ways.

Trump's appointment of an Assistant AG for fraud is based on public support over MN fraud. There is no boundaries for the fraud this Assistant AG will handle even though it is implied to mee about MN fraud. My guess is it will be Alina Habba. Good luck to rinos who plan to derail her appointment. Ghaddafi was treated better than they will be by people What comes next is a Public Corruption Integrity Court. It requires Congress approval via reconciliation. That is a Court to address public corruption that is not handled by public servants. It is a Court handled by Military using civilian laws and NG as jurors. Some might call it military tribunals but it is not . Same make up but civilian rules apply and runs parallel to our civilian system. SCOTUS ( the ONLY Constitutional Court recognized ) would still maintain final say ( as long as We The People still give these traitors power to have say)