Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 1:43 p.m. No.24117391   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24117306

>Quoted almost $1500 for an inferior shit brand pump

you have to do everything yourself these days - it's insane.

and you get some stinky weirdo

of unknown extraction

casing the joint

everything is damaged

 

find a local guy

if you can

that you trust

look around

some time that you DON'T need something done

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 1:51 p.m. No.24117408   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24117150

>U.S. Secret Service Agent Assigned to Vice President JD Vance Leaks Sensitive Security Information, including protective formations, shift schedules, travel plans, & real-time locations to an undercover

 

the fuck

 

>>24117385

>disgusting Ilhan Omar

branded

 

gotta love the Boss.

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 2:02 p.m. No.24117444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7824 >>7835 >>7880

>>24117419

>why are the new Basel rules called 'endgame'. i get it's the last part, so why not just 'last part' or something less scary like that

 

ai:

Short answer: “endgame” is a piece of insider jargon that stuck, not a deliberate attempt to sound ominous—but it does carry extra connotations that “last phase” wouldn’t.

 

3. It signals “no more extensions, no more rewrites”

 

Calling it “endgame” is also a credibility signal.

 

After Basel III had already been delayed, softened, and reworked multiple times (2010 → 2017 → 2023+), regulators wanted to say:

 

“This is it. No Basel IV, no Basel III.5, no reopening the deal.”

 

“Endgame” implicitly means:

 

stop lobbying for fundamental changes

 

stop treating this as provisional

 

start building systems and capital now

 

“Last part” doesn’t carry that same enforcement vibe.

 

4. Why it sounds scary (especially to banks)

 

You’re not wrong about the tone.

 

Outside regulatory circles, “endgame” evokes:

 

final confrontation

 

existential stakes

 

zero-sum outcomes

 

That’s why banks dislike the label:

 

it sounds like regulators are declaring victory

 

it frames capital increases as unavoidable

 

it suggests resistance is futile

 

Some industry groups deliberately emphasize how “dramatic” the term sounds when criticizing the rules.

 

so it fully goes into effect in April and it's probably why metals are soaring?

 

Short answer: Yes — in a structural, balance-sheet sense, Basel III Endgame does make certain commodity shorts less attractive for banks.

 

A commodity short (especially via derivatives) typically:

 

increases balance-sheet usage

 

adds market risk capital

 

adds leverage exposure

 

That makes the return on equity of those shorts worse than pre-Basel III.

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 2:09 p.m. No.24117471   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24117460

>It's a fucking shame Scott Adams didn't get to see any arrests before he passed.

1) I don't think you actually fucking care

2) no one said anyone would SEE arrests

3) he can see from heaven

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 2:20 p.m. No.24117533   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24117414

>JA was released from prison

someone was released from ugay prisons. I'm not convinced it was the original JA.

I believe the drop delta simply said

JA in the news?

OWTTE

 

>>24117431

>cop arrested a state senator for actual interference, he's ordered to let him go, but refuses

worthy news

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 3:03 p.m. No.24117754   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7824 >>7835 >>7880

July 1, 2028, is the target date for full compliance with the Basel III Endgame rules in the U.S.

Ugay is pushing it to 2030.

 

Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms, sometimes called the Basel III Endgame in the United States,[1][2] Basel 3.1 in the Ugay,[3] or Capital Requirements Regulations III (CRR III) in the European Union,[4] are additional changes to international standards for bank capital requirements that were agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) on 7 December 2017

 

The standards are expected to increase capital requirements for Ugay banks alone by £50 billion. (which is a lot of money in that shithole)

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-banks-capital-ratio-requirements-bank-england-505642

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 3:10 p.m. No.24117773   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7777

>>24117759

>"We do not want to risk there being cases of some 65-year-old in a rural area being barred from working

65-year olds should be allowed to reture

 

Only the shitty ugay government would base their excuse on pensioners being forced to work.

 

Are there no spoons? Are there no files?

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 3:14 p.m. No.24117787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7806

>>24117771

>New poll reveals Keir Starmer has a lower approval rating than Hitler in the ruins of Berlin, just before he shot himself.

standing at Maggie's crying window in the upstairs room of the fucking 'downing street' palace

Pathetic

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 3:21 p.m. No.24117814   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7834

>>24117806

>maria baralromo pushing the opposite of the truth on Iran Protests

Yeah

She's done this before

She is not one of us.

She did the

fake AI interview

with Trump in early 2021

with the 'father of the vaccine' bullshit

Anonymous ID: 97f35c Jan. 13, 2026, 3:44 p.m. No.24117884   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24117866

>Now we have tiny unsharable memes, that no longer can be made to go viral, just mini impotent postage stamps

Yeah it's basically true.

Last I heard if you send in $100 we get videos back