Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 1:22 p.m. No.24122185   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24122162 LB

"Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire."

 

"And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The axe lies ready at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire."

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 1:41 p.m. No.24122259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Sheriff calls city police to "check on" man who wants to press charges on deputies… city cop takes off when 1983 lawsuit is mentioned.

 

Corruption and intimidation.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 1:51 p.m. No.24122293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2295 >>2308 >>2867

ICE is on video telling people it's illegal to record them, which is ICE committed a literal federal crime, deprivation of rights under color of law, and some report having been detained for recording.

 

Are you ready for the biblical hailstorm???

 

https://www.ktvu.com/news/ice-says-recording-agents-illegal-federal-judge-says-dhs-policy-unlawful-jan-2026

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 1:58 p.m. No.24122316   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2856

>>24122303

>I’ve seen peasants carrying gasoline in an unapproved container

 

What about holding up the nozzle to signal the employee to turn it on? Doing that could get you killed in the good ol' USA.

 

Notice after the jackass figured out it wans't a gun… he still kept him detained and demanded ID.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 2:05 p.m. No.24122345   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24122340

False. They are telling people it's illegal to record them, yet standing observing and recording while not impeding them at all is not interference and can not lawfully be construed as interference. The same with free speech.

 

Good thing there's going to be lots of video evidence.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 2:18 p.m. No.24122374   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24122364

 

Again, ICE is ON VIDEO telling people it's unlawful to record agents, it's not "inference".

 

Also as a reminder, multiple states tried setting a minimum distance in law for recording law enforcement, including AZ's eight foot law, and multiple federal courts ruled them unconstitutional.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 2:22 p.m. No.24122396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2412 >>2420 >>2867

>>24122364

Since you're apparently unable to read…

 

ICE agents conducting immigration operations around the Twin Cities continue to tell observers that it is "illegal" to follow and record their actions.

 

Several videos posted to social media show ICE agents in Minnesota telling observers to stop recording. Some observers say they've been detained simply for filming.

 

A federal judge in California recently found DHS has adopted a policy that suppresses protected First Amendment reporting, observation, and speech activities.

 

https://www.ktvu.com/news/ice-says-recording-agents-illegal-federal-judge-says-dhs-policy-unlawful-jan-2026

 

You were watching CA right?

 

Get ready for that biblical hailstorm… it's coming…

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 2:27 p.m. No.24122412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2431

>>24122364

>>24122396

 

A DHS bulletin issued last June identified the use of cameras, live-streaming interactions with officers, and video recording at protests as "unlawful civil unrest" tactics and "threats."

 

Oh look, a paper trail of conspiracy against rights…

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 3:52 p.m. No.24122810   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2821 >>2857

>>24122805

She feared for her life… you know the same thing the cowards in badges claim in the land of the free and home of the brave.

 

The FACT is they didn't have the authority to order her out. Opening her door is in fact unlawful, and could put a REASONABLE person in fear.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m. No.24122880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2890

>>24122872

I didn't say that. Problem is, law enforcement ARE the criminals.

 

Who told you government courts get to "weigh government interest" against the peoples rights government is forbidden from infringing upon again?

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 4:07 p.m. No.24122895   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2904

>>24122878

LE are supposed to be held to the highest standard… they CHOOSE to do the job, they CHOOSE to take the risk… the citizen was put in reasonable fear BY the unlawful actions of an agent.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 4:09 p.m. No.24122914   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2920 >>2921 >>2928 >>2947

>>24122885

Do you understand "stalking" has an actual legal definition, and she in NO way "stalked" them?

 

Her right to observe is not stalking and can not be construed as stalking as it serves a legitimate constitutionally protected purpose.

 

She was trying to pull out

 

She was where she had a lawful right to be.

 

Talk and taunt is her right

 

No, she attempted to flee a violent criminal who MANY are already fearful of BECAUSE they're terrorists who tried to open her door and gain entry to her vehicle.

 

Try again

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 4:17 p.m. No.24122960   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24122946

So cops don't claim "fear for my life" to justify killing citizens?

 

If a citizen is put in immediate fear of their life by an officer violating their rights/law, that citizen has the right to defend themselves using necessary force.

 

However, she just tried to drive away.

Anonymous ID: 6ad191 Jan. 14, 2026, 4:18 p.m. No.24122966   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24122951

She was pulling out to the left. When her path was blocked as they put her in "the killbox" she turned back to the right as she tried to drive away.

 

Are you literally retarded?