What a good time for a bit of freezing rain
>Most, if not all child trafficking is done by police and white Christian organizations
Present your evidence
Canada #87
Through Her Stupidity and Fanaticism, Kaja Kallas is Threatening Europe’s Vital Interests
by Drieu Godefridi
Through her stupidity and fanaticism, Kaja Kallas is threatening Europe’s vital interests. She must go.
Kaja Kallas? Kaja who? You’ve probably never heard her name, or only in passing.
That’s the whole problem with the EU: here is someone who is High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, as well as Vice-President of the European Commission, and you’ve hardly ever heard of her.
The fact is that the EU is a bureaucracy with considerable power, which it uses in a more than questionable manner, and the only thing democratic about it is a Potemkin Parliament, which is prohibited from initiating any legislation…
Within this stifling bureaucracy, Estonia’s Kaja Kallas has been playing a disastrous yet decisive role since December 2024. Two cases illustrate this: the tragedy of the failed confiscation of Russian assets, and the sad case of Mr. Baud.
The Kremlin’s gold
In the three-act tragedy of Russian assets that has just played out, Kallas is everywhere.
First, as Prime Minister of Estonia. Estonia was the first country to vote on Kallas’ initiative to pass a law allowing the seizure of all Russian assets in Estonia, even those belonging to public banks. This was outright confiscation based on a purely administrative decision, meaning that the “targets” concerned were unable to defend themselves or even express their views. If you are Russian, you have to pay up, and we will take everything from you, please remain silent! This is questionable, to say the least, from the point of view of the rule of law.
At the time, Ms. Kallas’ government expressly stated its intention to extend the “mechanism” — i.e., outright theft — to the assets of the Central Bank of Russia throughout Europe.
The fact is that many Estonians, and Kaja Kallas in particular, harbor a kind of hatred mixed with terror toward Russia. This is understandable given their history: a small Baltic people ‘liberated’ by the Soviets in 1945, who were then martyred for 45 years under the infect Soviet communist regime: deportations, ‘Russification’, dictatorship, misery and mediocrity everywhere. This Russophobia is therefore based on very legitimate grounds.
However, hatred and fear do not justify everything. The administrative and therefore arbitrary confiscation of Russian assets, fantasized and then implemented by Kallas in Estonia, is in direct violation of international law.
Given that this concerned a total of 38 million euros (million, not billion) in Russian assets in Estonia, little was said about it.
But Kallas is not stopping there. What she is really aiming for is the administrative confiscation of all Russian assets in Europe, including those of the Central Bank of Russia: €210 billion in total. What a haul! The biggest heist of all time.
Kallas maneuvers so well that in December 2024 she becomes EU Foreign Minister. And what was just an idea in the air at the EU level becomes a project that Kallas will use all her bureaucratic power to bring about: the administrative confiscation of all the assets of the Russian Central Bank. By simple administrative decision: decree of the Prince.
We will not go into detail about the rational arguments that defeated Kallas’ insane project: violation of international law, inevitable repayment, Belgium’s entry into financial slavery to Russia for a hundred years. In short, Kallas and her accomplices attempted to impose on Russia the treatment usually reserved for the defeated, even before the end of a war that all indications suggest Russia will not lose. Pure madness.
But the real news is that the EU came within a hair’s breadth of making this madness its official policy. It took only one country, one man in fact — the man Orbán called a “hero:” Prime minister of Belgium, Bart De Wever — to prevent the EU from simply and unanimously entering an asylum, taking with it the stability of the international financial system.
The real news is that for months, the EU was effectively “represented” by a person with a very low IQ, who spouted false arguments every day in front of the cameras, incapable of responding in a rational manner to any of the arguments against her childish predatory ambitions.
The Baud case
And then there is the Baud case, which has been little discussed, given that Mr. Baud’s administrative excommunication came in the midst of the Russian asset crisis.
Jacques Baud, a former Swiss army colonel and ex-strategic intelligence agent, was sanctioned by the EU on December 15, 2025. These sanctions, decided by the Council of the EU, target individuals accused of participating in Russian destabilization activities, in particular through the manipulation of information and the dissemination of propaganda in connection with the war in Ukraine—a category so vague that it can encompass almost anything and anyone.
The EU accuses Jacques Baud of acting as a “spokesperson for Russian propaganda” and spreading conspiracy theories. In particular, he is accused of claiming that Ukraine orchestrated its own invasion to facilitate its accession to NATO. According to the official text, he supported or implemented actions undermining the stability and security of Ukraine through disinformation. This wording criminalizes freedom of expression by administrative decree.
In concrete terms, the measures include freezing his assets in the EU, banning him from entering or transiting through EU territory, and prohibiting European entities from providing him with funds or doing business with him. A modern arsenal of civil elimination.
Jacques Baud vigorously contests these accusations, denies any links with Moscow, and has announced his intention to refer the matter to the Council of the EU and the Court of Justice of the European Union. As a resident of Brussels, he is particularly affected by these sanctions, which effectively expel him from society.
Switzerland, which generally aligns its sanctions with those of the EU for economic and financial measures directly related to the invasion of Ukraine, has not adopted the specific regime relating to “hybrid threats,” according to the EU’s Kafkaesque jargon. The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has confirmed that Switzerland does not apply sanctions targeting disinformation and propaganda, as they undermine freedom of expression, which is less negotiable in Switzerland than in Brussels.
It is important to emphasize that Mr. Baud’s civil death sentence was handed down on a purely administrative basis, without any respect for the rights of the defense.
The procedure for this type of sanction targeting ‘disinformation’ is based entirely on and requires a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, followed by adoption by the Council of the European Union (in this case, decision CFSP 2025/2572 of December 15, 2025).
Baud is civilly dead in Europe because Ms. Kaja Kallas does not like his ideas.
It should be noted that Mr. Baud is not accused of any illegal act, only of spreading ideas and opinions that Ms. Kallas finds disagreeable. This is a complete denial of the rule of law and freedom of expression, transforming politics into a court of ideas. It is France in 1793: “We do not negotiate! We kill!”
In reality, Ms. Kallas is behaving like a hysterical person in the strict Freudian sense: someone who is unable to manage her unacknowledged hatreds and expresses them in delirious outbursts.
If Europe wants to survive, Kallas must go.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/through-her-stupidity-fanaticism-kaja-kallas-is-threatening/
Canada #87
UN seeks to redefine ‘children’s rights’ to promote abortion, gender ideology
Clare Marie Merkowsky Wed Jan 14, 2026
A UN committee is promoting abortion access for adolescent girls and advancing gender ideology under the guise of 'children's rights.'
The United Nations is seeking to undermine parental rights and children’s safety by redefining “children’s rights” to include abortion access and the promotion of the LGBT ideology.
From January 12-30, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is meeting to discuss implementing their newly developed Convention on the Rights of the Child, which includes a draft policy promoting abortion and gender-confusion on children.
“Mechanisms should treat the claims made by girls in an equal manner as other children, sensitive to their specific experiences, and address any discrimination in access on the basis of gender, for example, by refraining from imposing any requirement for approval by a male family member, especially for claims related to sexual and reproductive health and rights,” draft general comment No. 27 declared.
The draft promised to address various alleged “child rights violations” by ensuring “effective access to safe abortion services for adolescent girls.”
Later, the draft promised to protect the rights of “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex children.” It further called on states to “take a gender-transformative approach, including by recognizing the gendered nature of certain rights violations and properly investigating related claims.”
The promotion of the LGBT agenda to gender-confused children is especially dangerous, as a significant body of evidence shows that “affirming” gender confusion carries serious harms, particularly when done with impressionable children who lack the mental development, emotional maturity, and life experience to consider the long-term ramifications of the decisions being pushed on them, or full knowledge about the long-term effects of life-altering, physically transformative, and often irreversible surgical and chemical procedures.
Studies find that more than 80 percent of children suffering gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own by late adolescence and that “transition” procedures, including “reassignment” surgery, fail to resolve gender-confused individuals’ heightened tendency to engage in self-harm and suicide – and even exacerbate it, including by reinforcing their confusion and neglecting the actual root causes of their mental strife.
The document, drafted in 2024, was issued for public consultation in 2025. Now, it is under review by the UN Committee. While the document would not be legally binding, it would pressure other countries to embrace the UN’s radical pro-abortion and pro-LGBT agenda for children.
Many have voiced concerns over the document, including prominent pro-family activist Chris Elston, known as “Billboard Chris.”
“The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child is trying to classify abortion for minors as a child’s right!” he wrote in an X post. “They are drafting new policy which will advise that parents are removed from the decision entirely.”
“Gender ideology is not a fad. It is an inorganic movement pushed and funded by governments and intergovernmental bodies like the UN. Until we stop them, we will never stop gender ideology,” he continued, linking to a CitizenGo petition to protest the draft.
The petition, signed by thousands, warns, “If adopted, this text won’t stay on paper. It will become a new global standard and be cited in courtrooms, enforced in schools and hospitals, and used to pressure parents who refuse to comply.”
“The draft treats abortion for minors as a child’s right that must be provided quickly, and removes parents from the decision entirely,” it continued.
“It also pushes gender ideology, demanding that states reshape laws and institutions to affirm a child’s declared ‘gender identity’ sidelining parents who say no,” the petition stated.
The UN has long been notorious for pushing a pro-abortion agenda under the pretext of “human rights.” It has criticized nations that ban abortions and attempted to establish an international “right” to abort, all while taking a selective approach to actual human rights violations from offending nations such as China, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/un-seeks-to-redefine-childrens-rights-to-promote-abortion-gender-ideology/