whole milk and normal cheese is widely available already.
The law signed today allows whole milk in schools which the marxists in the Obama administration banned so kids would get crappy bad tasting milk with no fat in it (called 'skim milk'
a hailstorm might just be localized.
those who slander and act as if they know everything and damn everyone else
might be the only ones who even feel it's effects.
Careful what you wish for, it might just be just for YOU.
PS: you're an unwelcome presence in these breads, leftist agitator.
you're quick to slander and accuse.
what you do to others is very likely to happen to you.
they'll use your phrases, you lies, against you.
but in your case maybe it's actually true that you're what you call the others, leftist agitator.
you SLANDER
did I say 'damn'?
you don't have the power to do that.
don't flater yourself.
Oh, wait: you can damn yourself by being a constant slanderer and wishing ill on others who are only doing what they need to do to fulfill their LAWFUL duties.
you should leave these breads forever.
what you say concerning the ICE officer is clearly slander.
-
innocent until proven guilty.
-
he seems to have acted in self defense.
you seem to have no love in your heart for him.
if you can't love him you can't love anyone.
my suggestion is that anon filter this agitator.
it's clearly not open minded and seems to hate all legal authority.
maybe it's trying to conjour one up to destroy all the solar cells that power the police stations in his area?
probably it's his code word and it lets his frens who might also be here know that's he part of their gang.
In WWII and during Korea if people had agitated like these chuckle heads do at ICE activity or in these breads what would the government have done to them?
during the Korean War era, I mean by Korea.
I asked the Google AI about agitators in WWII and the Korean War:
"
During World War II and the Korean War, agitators in the United States who obstructed law enforcement or the war effort were
subject to prosecution, fines, and imprisonment under federal laws, primarily the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Alien Registration Act of 1940 (Smith Act).
World War II
The government took a strict stance against dissent during World War II, though prosecutions were less numerous than during World War I. The primary legal tools used were:
Espionage Act of 1917: This act made it a crime to interfere with military operations, obstruct recruitment/enlistment, or cause insubordination within the military.
Alien Registration Act of 1940 (Smith Act): This law was the country's first peacetime sedition law. It prohibited advocating the "propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence".
Individuals identified as agitators or subversives who obstructed law enforcement faced:
Arrest and prosecution: People were arrested for making anti-war statements, distributing anti-draft pamphlets, or other actions perceived as hindering the war effort.
Imprisonment and fines: Those convicted faced severe penalties, including significant fines and long prison sentences. William Dudley Pelley, a fascist activist, was convicted of sedition in 1942 for obstructing military recruiting and was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison.
Internment or deportation: The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 was last used during WWII for the internment of Japanese Americans, which involved summary detention based on ancestral ties to an enemy nation.
Korean War
During the Korean War, the climate of the Cold War and the "Red Scare" intensified the government's focus on perceived communist threats and internal subversion. The government continued to use the Smith Act and the Espionage Act to target agitators, particularly those linked to communist causes.
Prosecution of Communists: A prominent case was Dennis v. United States (1951), in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the conviction of 12 individuals for Communist Party activity under the Smith Act, ruling that their advocacy presented a "clear and present danger".
Limited Legal Protections: The Supreme Court during this era was viewed as less sensitive to free-speech concerns compared to later decades, generally upholding government actions that curtailed civil liberties in the name of national security.
Surveillance and investigation: The FBI and local law enforcement actively investigated and tracked individuals and groups suspected of anti-government or subversive activities.
In both conflicts, the courts generally deferred to national security arguments during wartime, applying standards (like "clear and present danger") that allowed for broader restrictions on speech and actions compared to peacetime.
"