Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 10:31 a.m. No.24125931   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5945

MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - Several videos posted to social media show ICE agents in Minnesota telling observers to stop recording.

 

https://www.fox9.com/news/ice-says-recording-agents-illegal-federal-judge-says-dhs-policy-unlawful-jan-2026

 

Some observers say they've been detained simply for filming.

 

A federal judge recently found DHS has adopted an unlawful policy that suppresses First Amendment rights.

 

A DHS bulletin issued last June identified the use of cameras, live-streaming interactions with officers, and video recording at protests as "unlawful civil unrest" tactics and "threats."

 

In an official statement last summer, a DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs said, "videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents… [We] will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law."

 

But U.S. District Judge Hernan A. Vera ruled last week that DHS has in fact adopted a policy that appears to violate the Administrative Procedure Act.

 

"Plaintiffs have plausibly and sufficiently alleged a decision to adopt a policy with regards to how DHS treats the recording of its agents," Vera wrote.

 

In addition, every federal Circuit Court of Appeals that has addressed this issue has held that "there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public," according to a 2017 ruling from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

The servants were meant to work the garden their master planted, not take it over and hide from their master

 

>18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights

>If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

 

>If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

 

>They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

 

>18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

>Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 10:51 a.m. No.24126010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6076

>>24125997

Perhaps they seem biased to someone biased.

 

Feel free to call out…yet… are you calling out Trump and those under him for THEIR bullshit? Or are you no better than the left who wouldn't call out Bidens?

 

Do you care they are LITERALLY committing crimes?

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 10:53 a.m. No.24126019   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6020

>>24126008

Funny thing about that… does 18 USC 242 or 242 make those exemptions?

 

Does the constitution make those exemptions?

 

Who came up with "classified" and said it can't be reported on?

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 10:55 a.m. No.24126029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6037

>>24126021

 

Feel free to call out…yet… are you calling out Trump and those under him for THEIR bullshit? Or are you no better than the left who wouldn't call out Bidens?

 

Do you care they are LITERALLY committing crimes?

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 10:56 a.m. No.24126033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6060

>>24126025

Darkness and hiding Truth from the people who are the ACTUAL masters of this nation rather than politicians and the courts is common sense?

 

Maybe if you're a moran.

 

What was the point of the 1st amendment?

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11 a.m. No.24126054   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24126047

> "The very word "secrecy" isrepugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. Wedecided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justity it.

 

That's classified!!!

 

People REALLY need to read the 1st amendment and 18 USC 241 and 242 again… CAREFULLY.

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11:05 a.m. No.24126073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6185

>>24126060

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; orabridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

That is an unconstitional law. Any law repugnant to the Constitution is void.

 

Depriving a right under color of any law statute or ordinance is a federal crime.

 

So again… What was the point of the first amendment?

 

You cite a law it was unlawful to put in place kek

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11:07 a.m. No.24126085   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24126076

I do not serve money.

 

Do you understand DHS/ICE is on video depriving rights and has a paper trail of conspiring to do so… claiming your constitutional right to record is unlawful and they've been unlawfully stopping people?

 

Are you calling that out or are you no better than the left?

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11:21 a.m. No.24126158   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Wannabe's: "I'm a patriot, I will fight for the constitution, I will lay down my life to fight for the peoples right to freedom of speech, freedom of press…

 

Whitehouse: "You can't tell people what you saw it's classified.

 

Judge: "I'm issuing a gag order."

 

So called Patriot: "Yes master"

 

>First Amendment

>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; orabridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

"Any law repugnant to the constitution is null and void"

>U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11:25 a.m. No.24126174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6182

>>24126157

 

In Congress, July 4, 1776

 

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Anonymous ID: e5a648 Jan. 15, 2026, 11:28 a.m. No.24126194   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24126185

Who wrote the 3rd amendment?

 

What's the 1st say?

 

Telling the Truth is not "levvying war" and can not be construed to be.

 

So y'all just believe whatever nonsense the "teachers of the law" who love the seat of honor and their minions say the law is huh?