Using the same play on words cops use…"ask", "asked".
They can always ask… but we can refuse. They can only DEMAND when certain lawful conditions are met. Randomly stopping people and wanting ID doesn't count.
They created a [killbox] or [deathbox] to CREATE justification to kill her for fleeing when they unlawfully tried to open her door.
She didn't run him over, he leaned in, despite having been clear.
She didn't come close to killing her…. but a [killbox] is premeditated murder.
*him
>even if he did, FAFO
Yeah they have been fucking around… no it's time to find out.
>a [killbox] is premeditated murder.
>MARCH MADNESS
More nonsense projection from you.
We don't do "papers please!" in this nation. Our rights aren't optional.
Well for one, demanding ID or "proof of citizenship" from American Citizens when not lawful. Telling citizens it's illegal to record them. Assaulting citizens for being close to them etc.
I'd shut the door.
Where's the warrant?
If they attempt to unlawfully arrest… people have the right to resist with force.
Why do you conflate standing against cops illegally demanding ID when not lawfully allowed with saying to abolish ID?
False. Not everyone arrested has an arrest warrant, and "looking like" or "sounding like" is not RAS.
Yes, they do. This isn't up for debate it's well established law.
Are you retarded?
No I know exactly how they work… criminally and unconstitutionally.
Need an arrest warrant.
Also they are not just arresting illegals, they've been telling people it's illegal to follow and record them… and DHS (who ICE is under) sent out a bulletin telling agents that it's illegal to record them, calling it "unlawful civil unrest" "tactics" and "threats.".
Following them in public and recording them is constitutionally protected. That is PROOF of deprivation of rights under color of law and conspiracy against rights.
Cops violating rights, constitution, and laws are cops violating rights, constitution, and laws.
The constitution protects rights to protect the minority from the majority.
https://www.fox9.com/news/ice-says-recording-agents-illegal-federal-judge-says-dhs-policy-unlawful-jan-2026
You were watching CA right?
ICE is violating rights, constitution, and laws, literally depriving rights under color of law and physically abusing people.
Absolute bullshit. ICE does not have lawful authority to detain someone and demand ID because they look like another nationality. There must be REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION based on a totality of circumstances. The leap from "he's brown" to "he's illegal" is a HUGE leap that ignores other rational explanations… such as their a legal citizen and brown.
Again… that's not reasonable suspicion.
Reasonable suspicion requires specific, articulable facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that criminal activity is occurring.
Some of the key factors and indicators that contribute to the establishment of RAS include:
-
Observations of Suspected Criminal Activity: Officers may rely on their training and experience to recognize behaviors, actions, or circumstances that are consistent with criminal activity. These observations can include furtive movements, nervous behavior, or suspicious interactions.
-
Information from Informants or Witnesses: Information provided by reliable informants or witnesses can play a crucial role in establishing RAS. Officers may receive tips or reports about criminal activity, which, when corroborated, can contribute to a reasonable suspicion.
-
Matching Descriptions: When individuals match the description of a suspect involved in a crime, it can be a legitimate basis for RAS. This includes physical characteristics, clothing, or other identifying features.
-
Location and Timing: The location and timing of an encounter can also be significant factors. High-crime areas or unusual hours may raise suspicions. For instance, a vehicle circling a neighborhood late at night in an area known for recent burglaries may warrant an investigatory stop.
-
Unusual Behavior: Behavior that is inconsistent with the ordinary activities of law-abiding citizens can raise suspicions. For example, a person loitering near a closed business, trying to conceal an object, or looking into parked vehicles may trigger RAS.
The hallmark of RAS is its reliance on specific, articulable facts. This means that officers must be able to point to concrete details, circumstances, or evidence that gave rise to their suspicion. It goes beyond a mere gut feeling or general intuition. Instead, RAS requires officers to articulate what they observed or knew that led them to believe a person may be involved in criminal activity.
Reasonable Suspicion requires officers to consider other possibilities beyond a crime, as it's a common-sense conclusion based on specific, objective facts suggesting criminal activity, not just a hunch. Such as I said… they could be a "brown" citizen, so being "brown" isn't RAS.
They only have to present ID when driving or, depending on state, there is RAS or they have been arrested.
For RAS, see >>24135650
Are you ready for domestic enemies to be arrested?
Oh NOEM said it so it must be true. DHS also said it was illegal to record them but that was a lie.
Do you know what conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law are? Do you know what a sting is and what bait is?
It's civil, not criminal.
What facts can you articulate to reasonably believe they are illegal rather than a natural born or naturalized citizen of Mexican descent?
That's not what ICE is doing though. ICE is not arresting on a criminal warrant and they're not receiving a jury trial… they're being arrested and deported on a CIVIL matter.
False and you should learn some reading comprehension.
It's False is a statement, and you lost because there is no argument.
To reasonably match a suspect description, law enforcement needs specific, articulable facts beyond just generalities like race or location, focusing on unique features (clothing, height, distinguishing marks), linked to the crime, considering witness reliability (observation conditions, emotional state, familiarity), and combining physical traits with behavior (fleeing, unusual items) or contextual clues (proximity to crime scene, high-crime area) to establish reasonable suspicion for a stop or further investigation.
Key Factors for Matching a Description:
Specific Physical Characteristics: Details like height, build, hair color/style, eye color, tattoos, scars, or unique clothing are crucial.
Unique Identifiers: Distinctive features, unusual items carried (like tools for burglary), or accessories (hat, glasses) add significant weight.
Context & Behavior: Fleeing from the scene, nervousness, presence in a high-crime area, or proximity to the crime scene can corroborate a description.
Reliability of the Witness: Factors affecting the witness's ability to observe (lighting, distance, stress, familiarity with the person) are considered.
Link to the Crime: The description must connect the person to the actual criminal act, not just a general area or activity.
What Doesn't Usually Suffice (Alone):
Race or Ethnicity: Relying on race or gender alone generally does not provide reasonable suspicion for a stop.
Vague Descriptions: A very general description (e.g., "a person in a dark jacket") is often insufficient without more specifics or behavior.
Mere Presence: Being in a high-crime area or refusing to answer questions (without other factors) isn't enough.
And here's a quote from the US Supreme Court… "freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state,"
According to the 6th circuit, “mere epithets” directed at a law enforcement officer, no matter how coarse or profane, do not constitute fighting words and are protected by the First Amendment.
So you can lick their boots and bow down, but we have the RIGHT to tell them off and stand on our rights.
Domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States in badges violating rights, constitution, and law do not deserve respect.
>NCSWIC