>Dough
TYB
Stollen
Andy Ngo
@MrAndyNgo
Jan 16
Far-left extremists in Minnesota are organizing a violent direct action to shut down anti-Islam provocateur Jake Lang’s rally outside Minneapolis City Hall on Jan. 17. The digital flyers for the leftist direct action make references to killing people.
Colin Wright
@SwipeWright
Jan 16
🚨 BREAKING: A rally organized by Jake Lang, dubbed a “Crusader March” condemning Somali fraud, is planned at the Minneapolis City Hall this Saturday and may proceed to Cedar-Riverside (aka Little Somalia).
A far-left Somali activist group is organizing a counter-action and has circulated explicitly violent imagery online and in group chats. One graphic, originally posted by an Instagram account called “klldaboer” (a reference to mrdering white South African farmers), depicts a hanged KIansman covered in bIood.
In their own organizing materials, the Somali-led counter-protest explicitly states that it is “FALSE! (AND M*RDEROUS!)” to suggest that “nonvioIence is the only strategy.” Organizers are urging participants to bring protective gear and to avoid filming, perhaps to prevent documentation of illegal activity.
They say they intend to form a physical blockade along the march route to prevent it from entering Cedar-Riverside, a neighborhood with a large Somali population.
Jan 16, 2026 · 4:05 AM UTC
https://x.com/mrandyngo/status/2012013229078446441
PB below
>>24130962, >>24130981, >>24130987, >>24131008 ‘March Against Minnesota Fraud’ - Stirring the pot
>Far-left extremists in Minnesota are organizing a violent direct action to shut down anti-Islam provocateur Jake Lang’s rally outside Minneapolis City Hall on Jan. 17. The digital flyers for the leftist direct action make references to killing people.
>>24130993 PB
>Most recent info from CAIR Minnesota:Please DO show up to counter protest in downtown
>>24131110 PB
> Designated Terrorist Organization CAIR talking shit
>Far-left extremists in Minnesota are organizing a violent direct action to shut down anti-Islam provocateur Jake Lang’s
Chimp Out Incoming
Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸
@JakeLang
16m
Today at 1pm I will burn a Quran on the steps of Minneapolis City Hall
☪️🔥🔥🔥🔥
America is a CHRISTIAN COUNTRY; we will not allow Somali Daycare Pirates to overtake Minneapolis ⚔️✝️🛡️
0:17
Jan 17, 2026 · 5:02 PM UTC
https://nitter.net/JakeLang/status/2012571135901135059#m
TT31780
[Profile picture from source site (X Post/Truth Social)] Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump 01/17/2026 11:19:14
ID: Not Available
Truth Social: 115911344443637897
We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration. Now, after Centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back — World Peace is at stake! China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it. They currently have two dogsleds as protection, one added recently. Only the United States of America, under PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, can play in this game, and very successfully, at that! Nobody will touch this sacred piece of Land, especially since the National Security of the United States, and the World at large, is at stake. On top of everything else, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown. This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet. These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable. Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly, and without question. Starting on February 1st, 2026, all of the above mentioned Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland), will be charged a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America. On June 1st, 2026, the Tariff will be increased to 25%. This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland. The United States has been trying to do this transaction for over 150 years. Many Presidents have tried, and for good reason, but Denmark has always refused. Now, because of The Golden Dome, and Modern Day Weapons Systems, both Offensive and Defensive, the need to ACQUIRE is especially important. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars are currently being spent on Security Programs having to do with “The Dome,” including for the possible protection of Canada, and this very brilliant, but highly complex system can only work at its maximum potential and efficiency, because of angles, metes, and bounds, if this Land is included in it. The United States of America is immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
DONALD J. TRUMP
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
>TT31780
Here is a careful review of the Truth Social post you shared (from Donald J. Trump, dated 01/17/2026). Overall, it matches the style, capitalization habits, and content of Trump's known communications on this topic, as reported across multiple news sources on January 17, 2026. This appears to be an authentic post (or a very close reproduction) announcing tariffs tied to the Greenland acquisition push.
### Typos, Spelling, and Grammatical Issues
The post is mostly well-written for Trump's typical informal, emphatic style, but it contains several minor errors, inconsistencies, and awkward phrasings:
-
"metes, and bounds" → This should be "metes and bounds" (standard legal phrase meaning boundaries or limits; the comma after "metes" is unnecessary and incorrect).
-
"end quickly, and without question" → The phrase "end quickly" should be "ends quickly" to match subjunctive mood or for smoother parallelism (the sentence is: "so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly"). Alternatively, it could be rephrased for clarity as "ends quickly and without question."
-
"remuneration" → Correct word, but in context ("not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration"), it feels slightly off — "remuneration" typically means payment/reward, while the intent seems to be "compensation" or "payment in return." It's not a typo, but stylistically imprecise.
-
"ACQUIRE" → All-caps for emphasis is common in Trump's writing, but it's inconsistent with surrounding text (e.g., "purchase" is lowercase earlier). Not an error, just stylistic.
-
Minor punctuation/capitalization quirks (Trump's signature style):
-
Random capitalization: "Countries", "Tariffs", "World Peace", "National Security", "The Golden Dome", "President DONALD J. TRUMP", etc. These are intentional for emphasis, not errors.
-
Missing Oxford commas in lists (e.g., "Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland" — consistent but non-standard in formal writing).
-
Run-on sentences and dramatic phrasing (e.g., the long sentence about "two dogsleds" and "only the United States… can play in this game") — characteristic of his posts, not grammatical mistakes per se.
No major spelling errors stand out (words like "dogsleds", "perilous", "tenable", "sustainable" are all correct).
### Other Observations
-
The content aligns closely with real events: News reports from January 16–17, 2026 (Guardian, Reuters, AP, Bloomberg, etc.) confirm Trump posted on Truth Social about imposing 10% tariffs (rising to 25%) on exactly those countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, UK, Netherlands, Finland) starting February 1, 2026, tied to Greenland negotiations. Mentions of "The Golden Dome" (likely referring to a missile defense/security system), Russia's/China's interest, and historical U.S. attempts to buy Greenland also appear in coverage.
-
The "two dogsleds" line is a humorous/sarcastic jab at Denmark's defense capabilities — it's exaggerated for effect, not a factual claim.
-
The post ends with the dramatic sign-off ("DONALD J. TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"), which is typical.
In summary, the post has very few outright typos — just a couple of small grammatical/punctuation tweaks needed for formal perfection. It's classic Trump: bold, rambling, and heavy on emphasis through capitals and repetition. If this is a copy-paste from Truth Social, it looks accurate and unaltered! Let me know if you'd like suggestions for a cleaned-up version.
>Here is a careful review of the Truth Social post you shared
was denmark involved in any way with the russia collusion hoax and/or spygate?
No, there is no credible evidence that Denmark was involved in any way with the so-called "Russia collusion hoax" or "Spygate" (the terms used by critics to describe the FBI's 2016 investigation into potential Trump campaign-Russia ties, the Steele dossier, FISA warrants on Carter Page, etc.).
Extensive searches across news sources, Wikipedia entries, official reports, and conservative outlets (including Fox News and The Gateway Pundit) turn up zero mentions of Denmark playing a role in originating, supporting, or contributing to the Trump-Russia probe, the Steele dossier, Crossfire Hurricane, or related events from 2015–2017.
### Key Points from the Record
-
The origins of the FBI's counterintelligence investigation (Crossfire Hurricane) trace primarily to tips from Australian diplomat Alexander Downer about George Papadopoulos (not Danish), the Steele dossier (compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele with Russian sources), and other U.S. intelligence leads. No Danish intelligence or officials appear in declassified documents, Durham reports, or major investigations.
-
"Spygate" claims often focus on U.S. figures (e.g., FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who altered an email for a FISA warrant; Peter Strzok; James Comey) or foreign allies like the UK (via Steele) or Australia (via Downer). Denmark is absent from these narratives.
-
Denmark's intelligence activities in recent years involve partnerships with the U.S. NSA for cable-tapping (e.g., spying on European allies like Merkel from 2012–2014, revealed in 2021), but this was unrelated to the 2016 U.S. election or Trump-Russia matters. Denmark has warned about Russian threats (including in the Arctic/Greenland context) and cooperates with NATO allies against Russian espionage, but nothing ties it to anti-Trump operations.
-
Conservative sources pushing "Russia hoax" stories (e.g., claims of Obama/CIA using foreign allies to spy on Trump) mention general "foreign intelligence" but never specify Denmark. Instead, they highlight the UK, Australia, or Italy in passing.
In the current 2026 context, Denmark-U.S. tensions revolve around Greenland (Trump's push to acquire it for security against Russia/China), not historical election interference. Danish intelligence has even flagged the U.S. under Trump as a potential security concern due to economic/military pressure on allies, but again, no link to Spygate/Russia collusion.
If new claims emerge tying Denmark to this (unlikely based on available info), they'd need strong substantiation — none exists in public records. The "Russia collusion hoax" debate centers on U.S. domestic actors and a few other allies, with Denmark not among them. Let me know if you have a specific source or angle to check!
>was denmark involved in any way with the russia collusion hoax and/or spygate?
have any of the 5 eyes countries collaborate with denmark on intelligence matters? if yes, provide examples please
Yes, Denmark has collaborated extensively with the Five Eyes countries (United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) on intelligence matters, particularly in signals intelligence (SIGINT).Denmark is not a full member of the core Five Eyes alliance (which is limited to those five Anglophone nations under the strict UKUSA Agreement). However, it has been a close "third-party" partner since joining the broader UKUSA community in 1954, and it plays a prominent role in extended groupings.
### Key Frameworks for Cooperation
-
Nine Eyes: This is the most relevant level for Denmark. It consists of the Five Eyes plus Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and Norway. This group enables multilateral but more restricted SIGINT sharing, often focused on NATO-aligned threats (e.g., during the Cold War against the Soviet Union, and more recently against Russia/China). Denmark's inclusion dates back to Cold War-era extensions of the UKUSA framework.
-
Fourteen Eyes (also known as SIGINT Seniors Europe): Builds on Nine Eyes by adding Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, and Sweden for even broader (but still tiered) cooperation.
-
Denmark is also part of various "focused cooperation" arrangements with the Five Eyes on specific issues like computer network exploitation.
These partnerships are informal/incremental rather than a single treaty like the core Five Eyes, but they involve deep, ongoing data exchange.
### Notable Examples of Collaboration
-
Long-term SIGINT Partnership with the US (NSA): Denmark's Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS/FE) has cooperated closely with the NSA for decades. A prominent case is Operation Dunhammer (revealed in 2021), where Denmark allowed NSA access to undersea cable taps in Danish waters (e.g., at the Sandagergård station near Copenhagen, part of the ECHELON network). This enabled surveillance of communications transiting Europe, including on European leaders (e.g., German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French, Swedish, and Norwegian officials between 2012–2014). While controversial (leading to backlash and internal Danish inquiries), it highlights Denmark's role as a key European "listening post" for the US.
-
Historical Cold War Ties: Denmark joined as a third-party partner in 1954, shortly after Norway (1952), sharing intelligence on Soviet and Eastern Bloc targets with the emerging Five Eyes network (including the US NSA and UK GCHQ).
-
Broader NATO and Threat-Sharing Context: Denmark's intelligence agencies (including PET for domestic security) routinely share information with Five Eyes members through NATO channels and bilateral ties. This includes counterterrorism, cyber threats, and Arctic/Russian activities (relevant to current Greenland tensions). Denmark has been described in media as a "de facto unofficial member" of the Five Eyes club due to its high level of access and trust.
Denmark's strategic position (hosting key internet/submarine cable landing points) makes it valuable for intercepting transatlantic/European traffic, which it shares selectively with Five Eyes partners in exchange for advanced tools, funding, and intelligence.
Note: Much of this stems from Snowden leaks (2013 onward) and Danish media investigations (e.g., DR broadcaster reports). Cooperation is ongoing but can be politically sensitive, as seen in recent strains over Greenland/U.S. pressure.
In short, while not core Five Eyes, Denmark is one of the closest and longest-standing collaborators among European nations! Let me know if you'd like more on a specific aspect.
Agreed
And pic related fag was with Lang at WHipple building last week mangling Q quotes on live streams
Antifa grabbing Lang's speaker and shoving him
starting fights
>they stolt jakes vest
>he seems to have left the area?
>by car
>or in hotel still
>not sure
he needed an escort from some group of black guys while an antifa black block mob beat the crap out of him and spitfire ginger girl that was with him. Was chased for blocks with the mob following somehow got into a little red car, got noticed and the mob surrounded the car trying to get him out. they somehow were able to drive off
He totally proved his point
Once Jake got away they started chasing random guy in a freedom jacket
like they doing to this guy with a flag right now
https://youtu.be/G8GGpzHpfe0
>they following this guy for 45 mins.
that dude got away when a friend led him to a car in garage and they sped out.
mob moved on to the next target. some rando dude on the ground with mob surrounding him yelling nazi. Another rando says
"he's one of us"
they argue.
sheriff department shows up and vans him