got any more of those Rubio memes.
I neglected to save any; should've done the set.
TYb
what's the caption here.
dangerous animal cornered finally?
Who thinks her alleged death was a psy-op
Makes a great mystery story.
I think it's her. It's been her all along. She had doubles, that's all, and never imagined she'd get caught.
What do you think? Narcissist?
>>24143730
good point.
anniversary of Trump's inauguration.
that's big.
Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns
With Pope’s Critics
Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.
By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes
Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET
ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China. He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”
An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture. The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.
“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who, as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.
But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as about China policy. Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.
Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism. In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief allies and delighted his chief critics.
Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances. He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html
When does a Church become a playground?
When does a Church become a business?
When does a Church become political?
When does a Church become corrupt?
When does a Church become willfully blind?
When does a Church become controlled?
Q
Vati's redundant and nefarious.
>>24143799
didn't kill MLK
What a surprise?
JE Ray even wrote a book.
Yes, James Earl Ray, the man convicted of assassinating Martin Luther King Jr., did write (or at least author/co-author) a book defending his innocence and promoting conspiracy theories.The main book attributed to him is titled Who Killed Martin Luther King?: The True Story by the Alleged Assassin (sometimes listed with slight variations like "Who Killed Martin Luther King Jr.?").Publication details: It was first published in 1992 (or around 1991 in some editions) by National Press Books in Washington, D.C. There was a second edition in 1993. ISBN for the 2nd edition: 978-1-882605-02-6.
Content overview: In the book, Ray maintains his innocence, claiming he was framed or coerced into pleading guilty (he initially pleaded guilty in 1969 but quickly recanted and sought a trial, which was never granted). He argues that the real killer was someone else, pushes a conspiracy theory involving a mysterious figure named "Raoul" (whom he claimed directed him), and suggests government involvement or a setup. He describes his version of events leading up to and after the assassination on April 4, 1968.
Context: Ray never had a full trial (he pleaded guilty to avoid the death penalty but later withdrew the plea). The book reflects his lifelong efforts to challenge his conviction and gain a new trial, often aligning with claims supported by some members of the King family (who at times questioned the official lone-gunman conclusion).
The book is relatively rare/obscure today, often discussed in the context of assassination literature rather than widely read. It's available through used booksellers, and reviews/summaries note it as Ray's attempt to present his side of the story.
Posner serial plagiarist
https://exiledonline.com/assassination-by-omission-another-look-at-serial-plagiarist-gerald-posner/
To recap the glory that is Gerald Posner: a few weeks after he was nailed for plagiarism and forced to quit the Daily Beast, Posner was confronted in a public forum in Miami by Frank Owen, one of the author-victims that Posner admitted he stole from—after being shouted down by Owen, Posner shouted in front of everyone in the room: “I’m a thieving cocksucker!”
Just when you thought you knew who not to trust, along comes another wave of bombshell revelations that make even seasoned skeptics and cranks seem like trusting pollyanas: you can never be too skeptical of the official version of events, past and present. Take the recent revelations about the legendary Civil Rights photographer Ernest Withers–turns out he was secretly working for the FBI as a paid informant all those years, snitching on Martin Luther King Jr. and his entourage. And that’s likely just the tip of the iceberg of the government’s compromised 40+year effort to bury what really happened in the MLK assassination
Now that his plagiarism has opened the door, we have an opportunity to review some of Posner’s other transgressions against the truth. As the mainstream media’s most preeminent proponent of the JFK-MLK “lone gunman” assassination theory, Posner’s major identifiable affront to unbiased reporting has been the invisible crime of “omission,” a methodology more heinous in the long-run than even flat-out stealing, or lying. In other words, you wouldn’t know that omissions exist if you didn’t know the information being left out existed in the first place. Which is why most of the readers of Posner’s 1998 best-selling Killing The Dream didn’t notice the subterfuge in his deliberately one-sided analysis of the MLK assassination, which attempts to eliminate any doubt that James Earl Ray was the lone-gun assassin.
both MLK and RFK were despised by creep transvestite blackmailer HOOVER.
A civil suit found the government guilt, found a gov conspiracy.
Here's Ray and Pepper, who led the charge, even though not licensed to practice law in any state (he had a limited license per Grok)
Pepper was a mole
When they found the gov. guilty Pepper asked for one dollar in damages, convinced the MLK family not to look greedy or make money off his death.
Pepper proved in other ways that he was a plant, though writing the definitive book on the conspiracy to Kill MLK
Typical hang-out operative.
Here's Ray and Pepper
Gov. found guilty in a civil suit; was never allowed an actual trial
Judge Brown ordered one and then immediately was given a TV show in Hollywood
Oliver Stone was going to do a movie, but was waved off.
He's a member of the one eye club.
"illumanati" whatever.
RAW says it's not formal membership, but I wonder?
Adian, X (?) winner of AU of "secret religion" fame , says different.
accusation of "IP hop" ID's the supposedly clever anon as a shill
They have to IP hope because they get banned.
ordinary anons don't care.
You 'll see shill also bring up
"consensus" another one of their neverending obsessions; Anything to keep people away from actual work and study.
No one has to worry about shill because they never contribute anything of value.
Up to eight glorious years.
fuck off shill
YOu're just making it make more sense.
RAW was an obvious spook
Even glorified his membership. .
Likely in the elite club of "Wizard & Warlocks"
Some others in that class; likely
"Alex Jones" "Hicks"
PK Dick
Arthur C. Clarke
Arthur C. Clarke wrote the short story "The Sentinel" (originally written in 1948 and first published in 1951). He is widely credited with proposing the concept of the communication satellite—specifically, the idea of using geostationary orbits (now often called the Clarke Orbit) for global telecommunications relays in his 1945 paper "Extra-Terrestrial Relays: The Future of International Communications." While he didn't literally "invent" satellites (as that involved engineering and launches by others), Clarke is recognized as the first to describe the practical system for geostationary communication satellites that powers much of modern satellite TV, internet, and global communications today. The story "The Sentinel" is best known for inspiring Stanley Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey (Clarke co-wrote the screenplay and novelized it).