TYB
do the "Q's" even come here anymoar?
Aksin for some frenz
>>24143300
one of anon's early works
they have greatly improve over anon time
>>24143341
anon was just thinking
do Hussien and Big Mike have memorable picrels like this?
aksin for some frenz
>>24143409
Business Insider concluded that Q’s authorship likely involved multiple people and that there is circumstantial evidence pointing toward Jim Watkins and hired writers, rather than a single government “insider.”[businessinsider]
Core authorship findings
• The article states there is “no way to say how many Q’s there were” in the earliest 4chan phase, because anyone could role‑play as Q within different threads.[businessinsider]
• Business Insider reports that Q’s writing style and complexity change over time, which they treat as consistent with different people posting as Q across different periods.[businessinsider]
Evidence relating to the Watkins family
• Business Insider notes that Q stopped posting when 8chan went offline and resumed when it returned as 8kun, which many observers saw as a clue that site owner Jim Watkins had control of the account.[businessinsider]
• Comparing Q‑drop timestamps with Jim and Ron Watkins’ social media activity, their analysis found patterns consistent with the theory that Jim Watkins, possibly using contracted writers, could be behind a substantial portion of the posts, though he denied being Q.
Role of other possible authors
• The piece quotes 8chan founder Fredrick Brennan saying he believes Jim Watkins is responsible for some Q messages but that “the majority were likely written by hired hands,” emphasizing a team operation rather than one author.[businessinsider]
• Business Insider stresses that, despite these patterns, authorship cannot be proven definitively from their data, and that the findings only “support the plausibility” of the Jim‑Watkins‑plus‑helpers hypothesis instead of conclusively identifying Q.
sure would be nice if anon could read the picrel
but no solid researchavoids discerniblepicrels
thanks for the compliment anon
>>24143551
the USA is in trouble because in the 1960's the globalists (already in charge of the US Gubment) passed immigration laws disfavoring European immigrants over 3rd world shithole immigrants
Change my mind