When is he going to demand LE violating rights be prosecuted? Isn't he for restoring ACTUAL law?
What about a cop chasing a pastor into a church and arresting him without lawful cause for free speech, violating his rights under color of law as the church goers scream… should he be arrested?
Violating the US constitution and the peoples rights to fix governments fuck ups.
Funny thing is… no matter how many vote for it, our constitution guarantees certain rights not be violated.
Seems they both hate their "constraints".
I'm not only talking about that specific case. I'm talking about ALL the infringements on 2A.
Notice they're walking them back, because they know what's coming… but they don't admit the supreme court violated the constitution multiple times and MANY MANY people had rights deprived under color of law.
They "correct" the issue but will never admit what they did.
And to answer your question… In my opinion, if they are a business open to the public, the public should be able to carry. If you want to do business in the United States… respect the peoples rights.
Your home is different.
>>24148677
Nice R.
The "7" below it looks like a hebrew nun sofit.
Notice you confuse "carry" for "at gunpoint"
>Man of Lawlessness
"Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
"Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’"
"Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’"
Jesus told us the one who handed Him over committed the GREATER sin, no one took His life, HE GAVE IT.
"You would have no authority over me unless given to you from above, therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of the greater sin"
"All authority in heaven and earth was given to me"
"Are you not aware that I can call on My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve legions of angels? But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen this way?”
When Simon said it must never happen, Jesus rebuked Him "And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying, “Far be it from you, Lord! This shall never happen to you.” But he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man.”
HE IS COUNTED AMONG THE TRANSGRESSORS.
>they have ome fucking job
It's hilarious to me people still look to the Supreme Court when they have violated the US Constitution many many times.
Grouping assault against LE in with those heinous crimes?
Some LE need to be more than assaulted. When LE deprives rights under color of law and no other LE stops them… it's up to the people.
I know… I'm next to it kek
Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States gets upset when man he pulled over and asked "where are you headed tonight" says he doesn't answer questions. Claims he's not cooperating and wont answer "lawful questions" then tries to unlawfully seize the mans keys. Then tells man he's getting a ticket for "not cooperating"
Our rights are not optional, and domestic enemies in badges who violate them or harass/threaten/intimidate for exercising them belong in prison.
If our rights, constitution, and laws will not be respected and upheld, then force is justified against domestic terrorists in badges.
>>24148908
Actually "order" brought "chaos" so they could bring "order".
Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States Unlawfully Goes Hands On and Removes Man Lawfully Recording Post Office By Force, Depriving Rights Under Color of Law
As USPS and Homeland Security have reminded, recording in public areas of federal buildings, including post offices, is constitutionally protected.
He tried to show the domestic enemy Poster 7 rules and regulations but the domestic enemy just went hands on. Using appropriate force in response against the Domestic Enemy would be FULLY JUSTIFIED.
So when will the domestic enemy be charged for his federal crime? What the fuck do the people pay DOJ for?
>EXCLUSIVE: Insurrection Act Memo Is Making The Rounds At The White House
Oops, meant to say See: >>24148470
The trick is to send in "assets" to agitate and get it declared unlawful assembly.
But it's just fine when cops are intentionally injuring, intimidating, or interfering with, or attempting to injure, intimidate, or interfere, any person by force, threat of force, or physical obstruction exercising a constitutionally protected right.
See >>24148973
>>24149189
I always laugh at the morans who think the declaration of independence has no bearing in modern US government and only the constitution does.
They might want to refresh themselves on the 9th amendment to the constitution.
Yes they are… but so are the rights ICE is violating in the process.
He's showing pics of cops?
It's for political purposes
Nope… they're not bastards… they're domestic enemies.
Domestic Enemies to the Constitution of the United States harass man lawfully recording in public, tell him in Arkansas it's against the law to record people who are not law enforcement