Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:09 p.m. No.24151130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1148 >>1194 >>1384 >>1671 >>1710

>>24150988

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's Third Prediction Comes True: study reports rise in tuberculosis

Real Science Predicts

R. Clinton Ohlers, PhD

Jan 20, 2026

For three years, I’ve been watching for this. I’ve been waiting ever since I watched this astonishing video—seven and a half minutes that everyone needs to see.

In December of 2021, just months after the rollout of the mRNA genetic vaccine, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a highly published German microbiologist and immunologist of Thai Descent, predicted three tragic consequences. These he presented in a joint livestream with the renowned Dr. Arne Burkhardt, as part of a symposium hosted by Doctors for COVID Ethics.

His weren’t predictions of what might happen. These were what would happen. The mass deployment of mRNA vaccines would not end with short-term adverse events. The real damage would appear later, quietly, out of view.

The Predictions

Bhakdi’s first prediction: viruses previously suppressed in the bodies of the now vaccinated would resurge in some individuals. A consequent prediction was that, as a result, rates of miscarriages and natal death, which is when a fetus dies in the womb after viability but before birth, would also rise.*

Second: cancers.

Third: an ominous upsurge of tuberculosis.

 

Bhakdi warns:

I predict, we have predicted this, that because of this damn vaccination there is going to be an upsurge of tuberculosis worldwide, especially in those countries where the tuberculosis bacterium has been lying dormant in the bodies of these people. That is India, Africa, all of Asia.

Tuberculosis would not be alone. Rather it is just one or many dormant infections in global populations, pathogens normally suppressed by a strong lymphatic system.

There are so many more dangerous infectious agents that are sleeping in the bodies of billions of people around the earth.

Now when they would explode, no one knows. Tuberculosis needs time to explode. These bacteria are very slow.

There is another disease call toxoplasmosis, which is around the world, especially the Mediterranean. And if toxoplasmosis breaks out, God help you, but God help you if tuberculosis breaks out. Tuberculosis once was the major killer of mankind.

When lymph cells are instructed by invading mRNA to produce a foreign protein from a foreign organism, the immune system attacks part of the immune system that aids in keeping viruses suppressed, killing cancer seedlings, and keeping tuberculosis in check.

When that process is repeated at scale, immune regulation itself is damaged. Lymphocytes responsible for immune control are depleted. Sentinel cells in lymph nodes are destroyed.

Latent infections that have been held in check for decades lose their restraint. Cancers erupt.

 

1/multiple

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:12 p.m. No.24151148   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1168 >>1194 >>1384 >>1671 >>1710

>>24151130

2/mulltiple

The Confirmations

Confirmation of the first two predictions came almost immediately. Reports from the vaccinated of reemergence of once suppressed viruses they had thought were behind them.

Hospital whistleblowers reported natal death at levels over almost 30x what they had been before.

Then, came the reports of the cancers. All kinds of cancers. At all the wrong times. Cancers previously reserved for 70-year-olds now seen in in 20-year-olds. Cancers so fast they were stage four when first diagnosed: turbocancers.

Tuberculosis?

There were cases here and there. But would we see population-wide increases?

Three years later, we have confirmation.

The South Korea Study

A nationwide study from South Korea, involving more than 51.6 million people now demonstrates a 35% rise in tuberculosis cases. These are occurring among the COVID vaccinated who both had COVID and received multiple boosters of the vaccine.

The study, published by Jihun Song et. al. in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, analyzed health outcomes across the entire population of South Korea, linking vaccination records with national insurance data.

In my opinion, this study is yet another exercise in peer-reviewed signal burial. If you don’t know where to look, you won’t find it. But when you do, it’s glaring.

We can thank Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, with the McCullough Foundation, for exhuming the truth and bringing it to light. The interesting stuff isn’t in the study itself, it is in the supplementary material—a downloadable word doc the authors included with the study.

This is important because, if one doesn’t know the the signal is found in this “extra” material, Hulscher’s conclusions from the study won’t make sense. I texted him while writing this to get clarity. He kindly called me back and we worked through the attached document in detail.

This “supplementary” data contains a troubling Table 3 that compares the unvaccinated population with vaccinated, grouped by number of doses received. It’s Table 2 also groups vaccine recipients by age. Table 2 is somewhat helpful in that it examines populations by age groups: 19 and under, and 65 and over. It is less helpful in that it doesn’t separate a purely unvaccinated group and it conflates the very young with very low vaccination rates with young adults who received the vaccine at rates of above 90%. * *

Nevertheless, the two taken together are telling.

Vaccinated individuals experienced a dose-dependent rise in respiratory infections, including pneumonia and tuberculosis. The increases were not subtle. In some categories, incidence rose dramatically above baseline. Children were among the most affected.

Among individuals aged zero to nineteen, incidence of the common cold rises following each booster to an incredible +559% increase with the fourth shot.

This means a child that formerly had between two or three colds a year, after a fourth shot has them every month. Is is sad to realize that this was done to young people for whom the risk of harm from COVID was virtually zero.

More accurate numbers are probably even worse. Because this portion of the study combined the unvaccinated group with those who received one dose, we don’t know the actual increase compared with those whose dose was actually zero. For example, if the unvaccinated as a group had only 25% less colds than those who received 1 dose, the increase frequency of colds at dose four would be even higher.

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:16 p.m. No.24151168   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1194 >>1205 >>1384 >>1671 >>1710

>>24151148

3/multiple

South Korea is not a fringe dataset. It has one of the most comprehensive national health surveillance systems in the world. The scale of the study alone makes it impossible to dismiss.

South Korea reports uptake of the Covid vaccines in the high 90th percentiles among all adult ages. Among 20 to 29-year-olds a staggering 98.9% had both doses. Among 30 to 39-year-olds, 96.9%. Even the 12 to 17-year-olds received both doses at a rate of 52.6%.

These people have a lot of years left to live.

It this study just revealing the tip of a tuberculosis iceberg?

The world will now inevitably find out firsthand—the hard way.

Real Science Predicts

Why was Dr. Bhakdi right when global health authorities were wrong?

In real science, you observe a system, its components, their operations, their variations, how they work. Then you can form a hypothesis. Then you predict based on the hypothesis. What must happen if your hypothesis is right? What must happen if another variable is added. The accuracy or inaccuracy of those predictions confirm or falsify your theory.

It is called the hypothetical-deductive method. It is the scientific method.

The reason Dr. Bhakdi has been proven right is because he understands cause and effect on the immune system, when you force lymph cells to create a foreign pathogenic protein.

He understood this the way the rest of us understand cause and effect on the skeletal system, when you force a body into free fall off a three story building with a parking lot below.

As Song et al.’s supplementary data demonstrates, predictions based on the authorized hypothesis of “safe and effective” are crashing as badly as the three-story jumper.

Tragically, most of the developed world’s people have bet with their health on that mistaken hypothesis. Hopefully, genuinely scientifically based predictions will allow us to overcome longer-term consequences with reality based solutions.

Science and SafeBlood

When I joined SafeBlood in December of ‘22, I had already written extensively on the mRNA vaccine risks and injuries at WorldTribune.com. I asked our Swiss founder Georg Della Pietra whom he recommended to deepen my understanding. As a historian of science recently returned from Asia—Hong Kong, no less, that Babylon 5 of international expats—I knew there’s nothing like an international perspective to sharpen awareness.

Georg led with two names: Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Stephan Hokertz.

Dr. Hokertz is the Dr. Malone of Germany. He spent 10 years working on the mRNA platform and watched it fail in animal trials. Horrified to see it rolling out as the Mengelean solution to the pandemic, he sounded the alarm long before Dr. Malone took the vaccine himself and received his reality check with a case of tachycardia that he thankfully survived. Hokertz’ rewards was to have his bank accounts frozen by the government. I got in touch with him after he had fled Germany and taken refuge Switzerland. By then he was no longer as talkative.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is an author on 314 PubMed-listed publications, many of which are highly cited. His videos survived on YouTube alternatives like Rumble and Bitchute, those final bastions where free speech and truth had likewise fled to make their own last stand. That clip above hit me hardest of anything I’d reviewed.

And so I’ve been waiting. Would tuberculosis also resurge?

Understanding real science and learning from those who practice it is how SafeBlood got started. Our website, safeblood.com shows microscopic observation of mRNA-vaccinated vs unvaccinated blood that led to the hypothesis that the blood supply was becoming unsafe. Like Bhakdi’s, our prediction came true with dreadful inevitability.

Those fulfillments are the subject of future posts and can be found in any of my many interviews.

For now, what matters is that people keep themselves safe. On the one side, real science saves lives, promotes health, and provides safety.

On the other, fake science slides effortlessly into crimes against humanity, and into crimes against individuals.

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:22 p.m. No.24151205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1212 >>1384 >>1671 >>1710

>>24151168

4/multiple

Twisted Science and Twisted Justice

Sadly, Dr. Bhakdi would himself soon face the wrath of the Pharma-Captured State.

The European Union’s sense of justice has proven even more twisted than its science, at least among the authorities.

Bhakdi’s reward for warning the rest of us was to be charged by German prosecutors with “Incitement to Hatred.” The basis? For talking about how much he loves the Jews and Jewish cultural achievements, while deploring the state of Israel’s pushing the mRNA vaccines.

The charges came on May 1, 2022, less than six months after this video. Although Bhakdi was acquitted in May of 2023, prosecutors appealed and as of 2026, he is still awaiting another hearing before a higher court. Further appeals are possible, depending on how the appellate proceedings unfold. From the sound of it, the criteria for further appeals is if the prosecution loses.

It seems to me that if there were ever a body responsible for incitement to hatred, it would be the one that foisted a dangerous medical product on a trusting populace now forced to watch loved ones die and struggle.

Adding insult to injury, of course, even Wikipedia got in on the act. If anyone wants to see an egregious example of propaganda and misinformation at its worst, and finest, check out the Wikipedia page on Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

But if you do, remember this video and the South Korea study.

Real science predicts.

  • In this section Bhakdi, a German speaker, states, “Herpes virus, if you cannot control it, explodes and you get shingles.” To clarify for our English readers: chickenpox is caused by the herpesvirus varicella-zoster virus (VZV) which is human herpesvirus 3 (HHV 3), and which can result in shingles. English speakers normally refer to herpes simplices 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) as “herpes” and HHV-3 as “chickenpox.” Bhakdi is not to be understood as stating that if herpes simplex 1 or 2 explodes, shingles occurs.

    • The data presented in the study proper includes no separate category for the fully unvaccinated. The baseline group is 0-1 doses. In a country where between 95.5% and 98.9% of adults age 20 to 79 received at least one dose, such a grouping is in reality simply a comparison of 1, 2, 3, and 4 doses of the vaccine, as the unvaccinated population will be invisible in the study. This may be expected to create a false appearance of vaccine efficacy in certain cases, particularly pertussis which is highly correlated to age. The study emphasizes Pertussis as declining with increased COVID vaccination. Pertussis is naturally highest among children age 11 and under, and lowest among adults. In South Korea, less than 1.5% of children age zero to eleven received a COVID vaccine. Therefore, both the unvaccinated and 0-1 shot cohorts include within them virtually all of the young children in South Korea ages zero to eleven. Conversely, third and fourth shots are most represented among older adults, who also naturally have the lowest rates of pertussis. Therefore, a dramatically lower incidence of pertussis among individuals who received shots three and four, when compared with the unvaccinated and the 0-1 shot cohorts, may be expected as an artifact of demographics and not vaccine efficacy.

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:23 p.m. No.24151212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1246 >>1384 >>1671 >>1710

>>24151205

5/5

Sources

Bhakdi video (user-provided): https://www.bitchute.com/video/yMLok5EcNpbc The original source is the Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium, December 10, 2021.

Bhakdi, S., Burkhardt, A. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination. Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium. December 15, 2021. https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

Shafiee, A., Amini, M.J., Arabzadeh Bahri, R. et al. Herpesviruses reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 28, 278 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01238-9

Ohlers, R. C. Alarm sounded on increased incidence of stillborns reported among vaccinated mothers. World Tribune. December 13, 2021.

Ohlers, R. C. Global depopulation: Taiwan, Hungary, Germany show record post-vaccine declines in new births. World Tribune. July 8, 2022. https://worldtribune.com/global-depopulation-taiwan-hungary-and-germany-show-record-post-vaccine-declines-in-new-births/#gsc.tab=0

Kuperwasser, C., El-Deiry, W. S. COVID vaccination and post infection cancer signals: Evaluating pattern and potential biological mechanisms. Oncotarget. 17, January 2026. (This meta-study of 69 peer-reviewed studies of 333 individual cancer cases worldwide demonstrates the rise of rapidly growing, COVID-19 associated “turbo” cancers.) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RH0f1BEqY9I7ruuPKQPU6bGNVJRyxZxc/view

Nationwide Korea study. Song, Jihun et al. Incidence of respiratory infections after the COVID-19 pandemic (2023-2024) and its association of vaccination among entire populations in Korea. International Journal of Infectious Diseases: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(25)00416-3/fulltext. See, Supplementary materials: downloadable doc.

Minhas, A. National coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination rate in South Korea as of August 28, 2023, by age group. Statistica. Nov 29, 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1358025/south-korea-national-covid-19-vaccination-rate-by-age/#:~:text=As%20of%20August%2028%2C%202023%2C,percent%20and%2098.9%20percent%20respectively.

Hulcher, N. Posts on X: November 10, 2025, January 9, 2026. See, commentary and data summary, below.

Hulscher, N. Personal conversation. January 18, 2026.

Ohlers, R. C. Effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine was hiding in plain sight. World Tribune. September 21, 2020. https://worldtribune.com/effectiveness-of-hydroxychloroquine-was-hiding-in-plain-sight/#gsc.tab=0

About Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. Bio: https://doctors4covidethics.org/about-sucharit-bhakdi-md/. Legal case: https://doctors4covidethics.org/written-judgment-in-the-prof-bhakdi-case/

 

https://safeblood.substack.com/p/dr-sucharit-bhakdis-third-prediction

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 6:50 p.m. No.24151308   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24151203

>true figure is higher, IDF says

what percent of NYC population is jew?

what percent of NYPD is jew?

they do not have to serve, they are "God's Chosen People™"

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 7:31 p.m. No.24151439   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1442

>>24151421

>maybe if you bothered to stop just posting talking points you'd figure out some stuff

maybe you could see more clearly with your head NOT up trump's ass

if your brains were plutonium, you couldn't blow your nose

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 7:40 p.m. No.24151481   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1548

>>24151451

bomb iran

steal venezuelan oil to fund US Inc

impotent attacks on russia economically

turn blind eye to IDF genocide in gaza

make impotent gestures to end genocide of orthodox Christians in ukraine

send MORE taxpayer money to israel

make impotent threats to FRB

threaten to invade sovereign nations

the post size limit prevents a comprehensive and exhaustive list

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 7:45 p.m. No.24151508   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24151455

> where he'll meet with world leaders and deliver remarks at the World Economic Forum

or maybe seek asylum from the DS before the whitehats can arrest and unmask the short fat KM fake trump puppet?

Anonymous ID: 53c109 Jan. 20, 2026, 8:06 p.m. No.24151602   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24151571

>George W. have a worldwide Communist media machine working against him, especially in his own Country?

yes…

he DID

or did you believe the zionists weren't corrupting gov'ts worldwide back then?