>dough
Nice dough! TYB!
>Today's LEOs and Police are YOUR Army,
>Not mine.
That is what makes you a sad specimen of humanity. Were you arrested, accosted, or hurt in some way by law enforcement?
>>24160725
>"The US STATE DEPARTMENT SCREW WORM didn't come from Mexico"
In case you didn't guess, those places of Barney's are all about latitude 30° N or S - the horse latitudes. When I said not exactly, he said remember the equatorial convergence zone shifts in winter, and to add in Libya, Osaka, and a place I forget - wait, Alice Springs, Australia.
The Screwfly Solution
by Raccoona Sheldon
https://lexal.net/scifi/scifiction/classics/classics_archive/sheldon/sheldon1.html
> is currently your beloved LEOs/Police
Why do you place me in the opposing camp, Anon? Do you seek confrontation?
>>24160773
It is good for you to share these feelings with the world in writing, Anon. Bless you and the law enforcement personnel you encounter.
>>24160781
>Isn’t that right …?
No. that's not right. Your conclusions seem delusional.
>>24160800
>yet CHEMTRAILS are never, ever talked about.
'Chemtrails' are aircraft contrails that become cirrus clouds. The phenomenon is called 'aircraft-induced-cirrus' and is quite well known. It has been studied since 1944-1945. Only the poorly educated refer to the phenomenon as 'chemtrails'
>>24160821
>shut the fuck up
No. Aircraft contrails become cirrus clous cover. Only fools call it 'chemtrails'.
>It called cloud seeding.
Cloud seeding is no secret, Anon.
United Arab Emirates is using cloud seeding tech to make it rain
Published Mon, Mar 18 2024
In the 1990s, the UAE introduced a rain enhancement methodology called cloud seeding. Cloud seeding is the process of increasing the amount of rain produced from the clouds above, which is designed to improve water shortage issues in arid regions around the emirate.
…
Once they spot the right cloud, they instruct pilots to take to the air with their specialized aircrafts loaded with hygroscopic flares on the plane’s wings.
Each flare contains about 1 kilogram of salt material components and can take up to three minutes to burn and shoot into the right clouds. After the seeding agent is introduced into the cloud, the droplets increase in size, surpassing the cloud’s capacity to sustain them against gravity, resulting in their release as raindrops.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/18/united-arab-emirates-is-using-cloud-seeding-tech-to-make-it-rain.html
>>24160827
>fuck you
You have no argument, Anon? You are incapable of discussing aircraft-induced-cirrus? I can provide sources:
Most long-lived contrails form within cirrus clouds
Analysis of seven years of humidity observations by instrumented passenger aircraft shows that conditions promoting long-lived contrails are fulfilled most often in regions already covered by subvisible or visible cirrus: ~90% over the Northern midlatitudes and almost 100% in the Southeast Asian subtropics, approximately equally distributed among visible and subvisible cirrus clouds.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65532-2
Why not read up on the subject?
>>24160849
>so sit this one out and stop responding
No. Debate the issue with sources. This is /qresearch.
Aviation effects on already-existing cirrus clouds
Here we quantify the effect of aircraft on the optical thickness of already-existing cirrus clouds by matching actual aircraft flight tracks to satellite lidar measurements. We show that there is a systematic, statistically significant increase in normalized cirrus cloud optical thickness inside mid-latitude flight tracks compared with adjacent areas immediately outside the tracks.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12016
>>24160863
>Your done MR CIRRUS sit this one out
Your attempts at dismissing this are comical. Aircraft-induced-cirrus cloud cover is a product of aircraft contrails.
A Case Study on Aircraft-Induced Clouds and Natural Cirrus
Aircraft-induced clouds (AIC), consisting of persistent contrails and contrail cirrus, contribute over half of effective radiative forcing (RF) to the aviation effect on climate.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AGUFM.A45M2020W/abstract
>>24160884
>i know several
Yet you are unable to argue the point effectively or provide sources. You have emotion without knowledge and you are frustrated by your ignorance, Anon
>>24160902
>you faggots
Every Anon at /qresearch is a faggot, NewFag.
Do you think that is an insult here?
>>24160927
>MR CIRRUS AND MR FLEA fuck off
As long as you believe in 'chemtrails' you'll never protest the increase in air traffic or the enormous expansion of regional hubs like Sky Harbor that bring over 50 million air travelers to the US SW annually. Aircraft are 'chemtrails'. You tilt at windmills.
>>24160943
Rage at your own ignorance, Anon. While you chased muh chemtrails the aviation industry took over your skies and created a patchwork of cirrus clous that warmed your globe.
>>24160952
>Nothing says
You are very new here. /qresearch and /CBTS have been subjected to much, much worse.
>>24160961
>Vati comes on like a 40 y/o pornstarlet….
He mages to keep himself in Red Bull and spunoW somehow.
>>24160971
>go back to your handler get a new script MR CIRRUS
No. Learn about aircraft-induced-cirrus before you fantasize about 'chemtrails'.
>>24160993
>NIGGERFAGGOT
All Anons are NiggerFaggots, NewFag.
Did you not read the 'HOW TO CHAN'?
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
They want you DIVIDED.
DIVIDED by RACE.
DIVIDED by RELIGION.
DIVIDED by CULTURE.
DIVIDED by CLASS.
DIVIDED by POLITICAL AFFILIATION.
DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
WE, THE PEOPLE.
WWG1WGA!
Q
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/17381714.html#17381714
>>24161009
>oh you niggers better sit TF down
We're all niggerfaggots here at /qresearch. Always have been. Do you know where you are, Anon?
>>24161010
>This is in Maryland and only one section of the sky. They have been spraying all week non stop.
Does this 'spraying' of contrail exhaust coincide with commercial flight routes? If so it is aircraft-induced-cirrus (AIC).
>>24161023
>>We're all niggerfaggots here at /qresearch
>I AM THE ONE WHO TOLD YOU THAT SHIT!
Thank you, Gunnery Sergeant Hartman!
o7
>>24161045
>there is ZERO evidence that the "globe" is warming
Correct. I concede the initial point. There is, however, a common concept of 'global warming' which I was attempting to address. The contribution of aircraft-induced-cirrus is considered a contributor to 'global warming' and thus confirms that aircraft contrails create cirrus cloud cover.
Aviation Contrails: What We Know - and What We Don’t - about This Warming Phenomenon
The full warming impact of aviation includes both CO2 as well as non-CO2 effects, with contrail-induced warming likely being the most significant driver of the non-CO2 effects of aviation.
Condensation trails - or contrails - created by aircraft flying through cold and humid air can significantly warm the climate. Most contrails dissolve within a few minutes, but in certain conditions, they can persist in the atmosphere, spread out, and become artificial cirrus clouds that trap outgoing heat. This represents an additional climate impact alongside aviation’s direct emissions.
https://rmi.org/aviation-contrails-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-about-this-warming-phenomenon/
Thank you.
Care to engage, NewFag, or is this a drive by?
>>24161082
>chemtrails from stratospheric aerosol injection are REAL and an entirely separate issue that NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH
It seems to be an emotional issue with you, Anon. Are you emotionally invested in the concept of 'chemtrails'?
Were you aware of aircraft-induced-cirrus before today?
Are you having a difficult time accepting the information about AIC and doubting your trust in your 'chemtrail' sources?
This is understandable and part of The Great Awakening, Anon.
>"Faggot" is a derogatory term among anons. Always has been. Glow nigger.
As an OldFag I object, NewFag.
>>24161108
>NOW YOU CAN GO FUCK YOURSELF
In other words you are incapable of asserting yourself and making your point. Your surrender to invective is noted, Anon.
/qresearch began as a chan.
Are you capable of articulating your point, Anon, or are you confirming the original assertion with your gesture?
So you are not capable of articulating a written response in disagreement with a fellow Anon on /qresearch. All you have is invective.
This has been noted to your shame, Anon.
"32">>4161175
>nobody wants to touch him ew gross
He once reached into his pants and pressed his ball funk scent under another man's nose according to a lawsuit.
>Q has been locking breads
No. Q doesn't bake. Bakers have baked for Q for years. PS - Don't bitch about the volunteer Bakers at /qresearch.
>>24161223
Chi-Rho = "Christos"
>>24161228
>DO YOU LIKE THINGS THAT THAT TRULY SEEM SATANIC BUT ITS "MUH RELIGION" SO IT IS NORMALIZED?
No. Rabbi Abe Finkelstein warned me here many years ago.