ALL PB
She Hurt for Him: Priceless Video Shows Woman Behind Jack Smith Looking Like She’s in Physical Pain as GOP Reps Repeatedly Expose Him as Fraud
by C. Douglas Golden, The Western Journal Jan. 23, 2026 11:00 am189 Comments
Truth
Tweet
Share
Gettr
Gab
So, former special counsel Jack Smith, the man behind the federal government’s Jan. 6 case, testified before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday. In case you missed it, Jack Smith sends his deepest thanks.
Suffice it to say, if you missed it, things did not particularly go well for Smith. He was grilled by Republicans over actions he took as special counsel that were pretty much prima facie violations of the Speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution — namely, using the powers of the Department of Justice to subpoena the phone records for members of Congress and was acting not as an impartial arbiter but a Trump-seeking missile tasked by then-President Joe Biden to destroy his political opposition.
“Smith chose to target President Trump, and only President Trump, in his electors case — setting aside other targets so that he could secure an indictment of President Trump in advance of the election,” the House Judiciary Committee said in a statement ahead of the hearing.
The hearing went no better for Smith, either — with one woman, in particular, visibly pained for him during his testimony in footage that went viral.
The exchange in question involved Rep. Brandon Gill, a Texas Republican, grilling him about his decision to subpoena the toll records — phone records who show who was on the call and how long it lasted — of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy just 16 days after McCarthy became the top-ranking Republican in the House.
Gill, not incorrectly, believed this violated the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution, which gives lawmakers broad immunity from legal liability or questioning regarding their role as legislatures.
However, when Gill asked a rather halting Smith whether he considered this a violation, he said, “I do not, and I want it clear–”
“You were collecting months’ worth of phone data on the Republican speaker of the House, the leader of the opposition, right after he got sworn in as speaker, all around the time of a major vote,” he said.
“That sounds like a flagrant violation of the Speech or Debate Clause to me, and I think most people agree with me, and Speaker McCarthy had no recourse, did he? Because you issued a non-disclosure order ensuring that neither he nor any of the American people knew about these subpoenas. Is that right?”
Smith, again trying to stall, gave a very long permutation of a response that could have been TL;DR-ed as: “Yeah.”
This goes about as well as you might think, but I want you to watch the woman in red flanking him on his leftand the man in the suit flanking him on his right as he stammers about the lies that went into securing these non-disclosure orders on the toll-record subpoenas:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/hurt-priceless-video-shows-woman-behind-jack-smith/