Anonymous ID: 529a6c Jan. 24, 2026, 6:39 p.m. No.24169312   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9315 >>9317 >>9331 >>9468

https://x.com/TheBrancaShow/status/2015188635876766090

 

IMMINENT THREAT OF DEADLY, UNLAWFUL FORCE

 

The shooting was justified under the law and circumstances because there was a gun present and was perceived as a threat by at least one of the officers.

Anonymous ID: 529a6c Jan. 24, 2026, 6:39 p.m. No.24169315   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9599

>>24169312

The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun.

 

Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.

 

Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.

Anonymous ID: 529a6c Jan. 24, 2026, 6:52 p.m. No.24169352   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2015173565457326313

 

Tim Walz states that Minnesota will be billing the Federal Government for the costs of the National Guard