>>24173159
'you anon'?
There are individuals here, called 'anon'.
they don't all have one mind.
That you don't know that shows me that you're new here.
can you clarify what you've said?
you say 'demanding they obey the law and constitution means doing away with them'
I'm not sure to what the subject and object of that clause refers. Which 'they' and what 'them'?
Do you mean Law Enforcement Officers?
You must mean them.
there have been shills here who have gone on about how no Law Enforcement ever obey the law. They claim that they are all dumb and brainwashed. And they do seem to want to elliminate law enforcement. Those shills seem to be adjutators and haters of law Enforcment. I just assumed that was where you were heading with your 'why don't they follow the constitution' narrative.
Why do you not think that they do follow the Constitution?
why do agitator judges not enforce the law?
Why do Democrats think that law doesn't matter if they don't like it, like imigration law.
maybe you can answer some of those questions. You seem as though you're fixated on it. Maybe you can clear up how it's OK for Democrats to aid an invasion.
and non of the shills every say 'why don't the democrats follow the law'.
Very curious.
thus people think you're not being . . . fair.