I understand this sting operation against domestic enemies…
God bless all with the destruction of the "thin blue line".
Wasn't something said about Trump saying he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and not lose followers?
What's funny is I don't know ANYONE personally who still supports this ICE bullshit…only "voices" online.
Notice how many desperately try to "attach" being against deportation to those calling out ICE's crimes?
You can be pro deportation and against how ICE is operating.
Who told you that? If it's an unlawful arrest you have the right to use force to defend yourself from unlawful arrest.
See Bad Elk v US, the 4th, 9th, and 14th amendments.
Is money your God?
Peoples rights are being violated, people are being abused, people are being killed… and you're worried about your bank account.
There is video evidence of ICE committing multiple federal crimes and a paper trail of conspiring against citizen rights… and that's not even got anything to do with the fake shooting op.
You mean people who fought and died for their rights.
Do you know when your rights no longer exist? When you're no longer willing to die for them. They're not just our rights either, but the rights of all.
"Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends"
Who told you that?
I'm a happily married man with friendships well over 30 years old. You do know you're not psychic right? The guesses you pull out of your ass aren't reality.
But then how can He and Trump (in reality military) identify and target or "brand" domestic enemies while simultaneously showing the people how evil they actually are?
You don't want Penelope settling for Tyranny in the place of Liberty do you?
>When given an order by a LEO it is in your immediate best interests to comply. Not doing so introduces unnecessary complications. If you are apprehended, submit immediately and comply with the order. You can argue later in court, or you can be defiant and risk getting shot
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants"
I'd rather be dead from standing for my rights than alive and know I'm a coward who was too afraid to stand for my neighbor and myself.
Sad how many absolute cowards there are in here.
Projecting evil everywhere says a lot about you.
I would die to protect his and everyones right to a fair trial.
Notice how hard you try to "attach" child rape (emotion) to your attack on the US Constitution?
LE violating rights constitution and law absolutely are.
That's like saying it's not illegal to walk into a bank during business hours…. leaving out they're robbing it.
You mean the bullshit op?
What about them?
What rights of yours are being violated by requiring LE to obey the constitution and not violate rights?
Is that the bullshit you tell yourself?
How long has the US government been violating the US Constitution?
How long have people been swearing an oath to uphold and defend that constitution?
I said nothing about standing in the street throwing bottles and bricks. I'm calling out the cowards who call themselves patriots.
Ah there's the thing… YOUR rights.
You don't give a fuck about the rights of others… back the blue til it happens to you.
Yes I know there are many bootlickers who hate the US constitution and the rights it protects.
>The straw man fallacy is an informal logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of engaging with the actual, more complex argument, they refute a "straw man" version….a fake, extreme, or oversimplified version. This tactic serves to make the speaker's own position appear stronger.
They are when they violate rights, constitution, and laws.
>ICE agents conducting immigration operations around the Twin Cities continue to tell observers that it is "illegal" to follow and record their actions.
>Several videos posted to social media show ICE agents in Minnesota telling observers to stop recording. Some observers say they've been detained simply for filming.
>A federal judge in California recently found DHS has adopted a policy that suppresses protected First Amendment reporting, observation, and speech activities.
https://www.fox9.com/news/ice-says-recording-agents-illegal-federal-judge-says-dhs-policy-unlawful-jan-2026
Deprivation of rights under color of law AND Conspiracy against rights… WITH a paper trail.
Enjoy the hailstorm.
>The straw man fallacy is an informal logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of engaging with the actual, more complex argument, they refute a "straw man" version….a fake, extreme, or oversimplified version. This tactic serves to make the speaker's own position appear stronger.
>allowed to live stream police operations
You misunderstand… the constitution doesn't "allow" us to do so… it prohibits government from stopping us.
>The straw man fallacy is an informal logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of engaging with the actual, more complex argument, they refute a "straw man" version….a fake, extreme, or oversimplified version. This tactic serves to make the speaker's own position appear stronger.
You might want to see court rulings on the subject. Just because cowards claim fear doesn't mean our right is not our right.
RULERS rule.
Why do "anons" here always think demanding they obey the law and constitution means doing away with them?
For what? What crime to do you accuse me of? Provide the statute and how I violated it.
>have one
A favorite part.
Lawyers serve the BAR.
What's the "thin blue line" symbolize?
Why do you call them "rulings"?
I've been here since CBTS.
When did I say they have one mind? I didn't say all anons, I said "anons" in quotes, as in fake anons.
LE violate the US constitution and rights of the people every day… and then pretend like they don't.
Tell me "anon"… who told you that government courts get to "weigh government interest" against the rights the US Constitution forbids government from infringing upon?
Who said for instance government can ignore the 2nd with gun control, or the 4th and 5th with roadside civil asset forfeiture? The 2nd and disarming for people lawfully open carrying?
LE, as a whole, are lawless. It's not individual apples, it's the orchard itself that is rotten and on fire.
I answered some… have you answered any of mine? Did I ask you a question before you asked me multiple?
I'll answer one more time.
>Why do you not think that they do follow the Constitution?
Because they don't. They violate it daily. This isn't my opinion it's fact. Gun control, civil asset forfeiture, prior restraint, detain/ID without RAS, the evidence is all over the internet.
>why do agitator judges not enforce the law?
Do any judges? Does LE? You're coming at it from one side, ignoring that BOTH are corrupt as fuck and BOTH LE and the courts are violating the law and constitution every day.
>Why do Democrats think that law doesn't matter if they don't like it, like immigration law.
See above. You're again ignoring that both "sides" are doing that.
I'm not a dem if that's what you're thinking.
Why would I vote for EITHER corrupt "party" in a corrupt system and consent to that system?