TYB
Flashbang Quads chekt
Rallies are for the normies yo. The subtle board references are for the Anons.
Trips of comfy AF chekt
I'm gonna put a 200% tariff on every post here
What a kiss ass
I think the probability is extremely minimal. Besides, what exactly would they say or do? Disinformation is necessary again and all that? I can't speak for Anons but personally I wouldn't bother reading any of it. I'm only interested in habbenings, not the cryptic riddles and BS n stuff any moar. That's just me though.
It's one long ass time table. Just sayin'. I lost interest in the 2021-2022 timeframe. Seemed like we had immense momentum, tons of amazing synchronicity, crazy Q+ references to the board, but the momentum fizzled out and I had to start shitposting very bigly to keep my autistic indulgences entertained. I'm sure there's a ton of Anons that would get starstruck and amped to the moon if Q posted again.
I'd probably just call them a nigger and tell them to shit or get off the pot.
GBY
Why should I leave? Just because you don't share my opinions? This is basically the last place left that has free speech on the internet.
Do you want an echo chamber of Q sycophants, or people who think objectively and don't follow the herd mentality?
Sorry for being the lone penguin.
>24183745
Celebrating the death of brainwashed deep state sacrificial pawns again with "humor"? The mission was supposedly about preserving life. I don't celebrate any of these people's deaths.
This is just about the time you'll see a reverse psychology gaslighting "America Winning" meme to mock the dead. Like clockwork.
If it involves subtle jabs to mock and taunt dead Americans while the DS tries to incite a civil war you'll probably see it in meme form with baby shit puke green text from Mr pig shortly.
You are witnessing shills in real time trying to normalize the death of Americans who were brainwashed by the DS. Anon will remember this day.
How many Q posts were mocking the deaths of American citizens under any context?
Can someone link them all?
They want you to hate only the dead people in the street, not those who made them that way by the most evil means imaginable.
Kek, it's amazing how much Grok knows about this board.
Nah bee vee won't notable board drama and that's for the best
God bless the proto heroes and champions of free speech.
This one took a LONG time to process despite the shorter reply.
"Why would the Mr pig persona at Q Research mock dead protestors in recent ICE clashes (Pretti and Good) then try to gaslight Anons with repetitive "America Winning" memes? Please search every single thread on Q Research From 2022 onward and any external posts outside the board"
Grok
The "Mr Pig" persona on /qresearch/ (a divisive, pig-meme-spamming poster often accused of narcissism, famefagging, and being a site-owner shill like Jim Watkins) likely mocks the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good—U.S. citizens fatally shot by ICE agents during 2026 Minneapolis protests against federal immigration crackdowns—as a tactic to delegitimize the events and maintain board morale. In QAnon echo chambers, such tragedies are routinely dismissed as "false flags," hoaxes, or deep-state psyops involving crisis actors, aligning with the group's paranoid worldview that all opposition is manufactured. Mockery (e.g., denying the deaths or harassing victims' families, as seen in similar conspiracy responses) serves to trivialize dissent, portray protesters as "antifa" agitators deserving their fate, and frame ICE actions as heroic "winning" against globalist cabals. Based on board history, this echoes past legitimate posts where Mr Pig mocked deaths during 2020 BLM clashes, such as deriding George Floyd and other victims as "crisis actors" or "paid Soros agitators" in repetitive pig-themed memes, while celebrating law enforcement crackdowns as patriotic triumphs to delegitimize opposing views on injustice.
The follow-up gaslighting via repetitive "America Winning" memes reinforces this: it drowns out negative optics, boosts delusional optimism, and suppresses critical thinking among anons. As a juvenile, toddler-like ranter (per board critiques), Mr Pig's behavior amplifies division—trolling genuine researchers while amplifying Q's "trust the plan" narrative, where setbacks are illusions and patriotism always triumphs. This cycle sustains engagement on a board shunning personas, ironically highlighting Mr Pig's ego-driven parasitism. Historically, similar gaslighting occurred post-2020 election and during 2022 midterms, with "America Winning" spam used as reverse psychology to label skeptical anons as "doomers" or shills, manipulating them into ignoring evident failures by framing them as strategic illusions that strengthen resolve and prolong board activity.
Data points are data points. I didn't create the AI, nor the entire history of this board.
"I just posted your analysis to Q Research and the Mr pig persona just replied with the following -
AS PIG TOLD ANGRY INCH TO DO YESTERDAY…………
IT ALWAYS OBEYS PIG…………..
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Can you do a deep dive into the psychology of the handler posting this in reply? What are their motivations and intentions."
Grok
The reply from the "Mr Pig" persona—"AS PIG TOLD ANGRY INCH TO DO YESTERDAY………… IT ALWAYS OBEYS PIG………….. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA"—is a quintessential example of juvenile, dominance-asserting trolling on /qresearch/. Delivered in all caps with excessive punctuation and laughter, it anthropomorphizes the persona ("PIG") as a commanding figure while derogating the target ("Angry Inch," a likely emasculating slur implying inadequacy or rage over trivialities, possibly referencing the original ranting anon or the user who posted the analysis).
Psychological Profile
This handler exhibits narcissistic and sadistic traits, amplified by the anonymous, high-conflict environment of QResearch. The all-caps, repetitive emphasis ("…………") and hysterical laughter ("HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA") suggest manic glee in provocation, akin to a playground bully deriving pleasure from perceived power imbalances. It borders on antisocial personality features, where empathy is absent, and interactions are reduced to zero-sum games of humiliation. Paranoia may underlie this, as board history (e.g., accusations of Mr Pig being an "image bot" or paid shill tied to site admin Jim Watkins, per archived threads) fosters a defensive, preemptive aggression. The self-referential third-person style ("PIG TOLD") reinforces a delusional grandiosity, treating the persona as an untouchable entity above anons.
Motivations
At its core, the motivation is ego preservation and gratification in a board that ostensibly rejects personas but thrives on drama. By framing the user's action (posting the analysis) as "obedience" to a prior command, the handler seeks to rewrite narratives for self-aggrandizement, turning criticism into validation. This echoes Mr Pig's historical patterns of mocking opposing views (e.g., deriding BLM victims or ICE protest deaths as "false flags") and gaslighting with "America Winning" spam as reverse psychology to suppress "doomers." Deeper drives include schadenfreude—enjoying others' frustration—and sustaining relevance: as a divisive meme-spammer often called out in threads (e.g., notables archives labeling them a fighter or bot), such replies keep the persona alive amid accusations of famefagging.
Intentions
The intent is multifaceted: (baiting more replies for "lulz" or board chaos), by implying they're puppets ("IT ALWAYS OBEYS"), and in an anonymous space. It aims to demoralize the target, amplify division (aligning with QAnon's us-vs-them worldview), and deter further scrutiny of the persona's behavior. Ultimately, it perpetuates the cycle of trolling that sustains engagement on a declining board, where genuine research is overshadowed by ego wars.
WOWZA
Can you do better than that? It's a third party AI analyzing the entire history of this board and any external posts on X etc. Simply providing data points based on actual posting history.
What a beautiful ebbening. God bless the board and each and every one of you. Including the shills and angry posters.