>>24192709 (pb)
a legal plan?
attack on 'our elections'?
no, you don't possess the elections.
go to jail.
go directly to jail.
do not pass go.
do not collect $200.
boo hoo hoo
the new tactic that showed up today is demonstrated by this poster.
suddenly they attack the anon who express the idea of treason.
after all they have been true to the tenants of Marxist dictatorships. Where is the treason? They were raised to be revolutionaries? they are not traitors to communist causes. So how can it be treason? They never believed in America. They never 'bought into it' maybe they never even said the pledge of alligence? so how can it be treason.
how dare you say that those who never loved America to begin with are traitors? They were never on America's side so they never betrayed America. They always worked to destroy it, as they were trained from birth to do.
they are not traitors but loyal born-in-it tribal marxists. how dare anyone say that they are traitors!!
that seems to be what the argument is.
>Where do you see ground to claim treason? You imaginary fren is . . .
did I hit that one out of the ballpark? how dare I use words to describe the tactics of the marxists who think that they are so clever!?
antifa-soros shill
Does not apologize for
running the same content over and over and over, bread after bread after bread.
"you can get anything you want . . . "
not 'have'
it occurred to me one day that he wrote a very very dark dark song.
one way makes sense, the other way makes no sense.
You are so hungup on correct spelling but don't have the sense to understand.
very sad.
you could at least post things that mean something.
you do not do that.
perhaps you're a time wasting hallucinating AI shill