>How many times did Steve Bannon interview Jeffrey Epstein?
Weren't there like 15+ hours of interviews?
That was only less than 2 hrs.
It was actually an interesting conversation. Epstein surely isn't a stupid guy. Kind of interesting actually, but I think it's up to people to agree or disagree with this complex adaptive systems ideas.
I actually identified a lot with the part of the conversation that we got, but I'm also aware that these kinds of ideas to make everything more complex than it might be is a bit of a symptom of elitist conversations. He's well versed, but is he right? He knows the language, but is he actually a financial wizard. What's between the lines in that conversation?
A few takeaways:
Epstein seems have been Rockafeller's boy appointed to trilateral commission. to what end though? was he the math wizard then or was his role to play the wizard and pretend with a strong lexicon and marketing language to woo elites or just hang in the conversations and keep an eye on what they were up to.
was he always a pervert? or did his hanging with this level of people open himself up to inviting in the vices of libertine life that happens at the untouchable level? did he fuck it up or expose something or reveal something that despite his own vice, if even real and to what extent, made the cabal mad? to put it another way, maybe he wasn't the black hat afterall. maybe not a white hat, but perhaps a naive but ambicious retard who turned into a grey hat, perhaps at the behest of the rockafellers. I think more needs to be asked about why the rocks pushed him forward, if what he was saying is the truth and not a diversion from himself or other sponsors. either way, there may be more truth to the idea that the epstein thing is a hoax. but what does that mean??? did the elites try to exacerbate and exaggerate his vices and frame him to take the heat off themselves?
the research component is also interesting with the Santa Fe institute. As a think tank, I was aware of them over 20 years ago. There's lots of talk about Epstein inventing Bitcoin, but he does give a fact that allows for some stretchy conclusions. Santa Fe was researching complexity in economics and finance…
Santa Fe Institute…Santafe Nstitute
S N
Satoshi Nakamoto
Stretchy, I know.
Bannon also hammers him hard but allows all this talk that has very little to do with the pedo accusations. Why???
Bannon knows something. Something BIG. He spent most of the conversation around all this other stuff we've never heard much about with Epstein. It makes him somewhat relatable, which isn't what I would have expected Bannon to do. He knows optics, so why would he go into all this other stuff???