Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:07 p.m. No.24213832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3837 >>3841 >>3843 >>3848

Look google Ai says bottom note:

 

 

 

+3

Michael Feldman, a founding partner of The Glover Park Group and former aide to Al Gore, is a political consultant who married Today show host Savannah Guthrie in 2014. They have two children together, as confirmed by Wikipedia and Politico.

Michael Feldman: Founding partner of The Glover Park Group, a strategic communications and government affairs firm.

Savannah Guthrie: NBC Today show host.

Marriage: The couple announced their engagement in May 2013 and married in 2014.

Note: There is no known connection between this couple and the recent, unrelated 2026 disappearance case involving an individual with the last name Guthrie.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:10 p.m. No.24213841   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3843 >>3846 >>3848 >>3881

>>24213832

 

Michael Feldman (born October 14, 1968) is an American public relations and communications consultant and a former Democratic political adviser. Feldman was Vice President Al Gore’s traveling chief of staff during the 2000 presidential election campaign. He is a founding partner and managing director of The Glover Park Group, a communications, consulting, and advocacy firm.

 

Biography

 

Born to a Jewish family,[2] Feldman began his political career in the U.S. Senate serving first as a floor assistant in the Senate cloakroom,[3] and then as a legislative analyst for the Senate Democratic Policy Committee.[4] In 1991, Feldman took leave from the Senate to work on Sen. Harris Wofford’s special election campaign.[5]

Feldman joined Bill Clinton's campaign staff in 1992.[4] Following the election, Feldman served in the Clinton administration as Vice President Al Gore’s deputy director of legislative affairs from 1993 to 1997.[3] In 1997, Feldman became senior adviser and traveling chief of staff to the Vice President, a role he held until 2001.[4][6] In November 2000, Feldman played a key role in Gore's decision to contest the results of the presidential election. On election night Feldman helped pass news to Gore of the very small vote margin in Florida. Feldman, with fellow campaign officials Michael Whouley and Bill Daley, pressed Gore not to concede and to push for a recount.[7][8]

In 2001, Feldman formed The Glover Park Group with Gore campaign advisers Carter Eskew and Chip Smith, and former White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart.[9][10] The Glover Park Group offers communications, government relations, corporate advocacy and crisis management services.[9] Feldman is a managing director at the firm; he developed and currently leads its entertainment and environmental practices.[11] In 2007, Feldman was part of a team at The Glover Park Group named Public Relations Professionals of the Year by the Public Relations Society of America for its work on Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth.[12]

In an interview with lawyers Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez, in regard to the Depp v Heard defamation trial, Feldman's wife Savannah Guthrie revealed that Feldman had worked as a public relations consultant for the legal team representing Johnny Depp.[citation needed]

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. No.24213848   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24213832

>>24213841

Michael Feldman is currently a founding partner and North American co-chairman of

FGS Global, an international strategic communications and consulting firm. He directs communication strategies for various corporations, non-profits, and individuals, having previously co-founded The Glover Park Group. He is also known as the husband of Savannah Guthrie.

Key Details About His Current Role:

Company: FGS Global

Position: Co-chairman and Founding Partner

Focus: Communications, consulting, and advocacy

Background: Former Democratic political aide and traveling chief of staff for Vice President Al Gore.

Note: There is another individual named Michael Feldman who is a partner in a New York litigation department, but the above refers to the consultant married to Savannah Guthrie.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:20 p.m. No.24213872   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3882

Trude Feldman had eight siblings but no children.

 

Is Guthries husband related to her.

 

https://jewishstandard.timesofisrael.com/in-memory-of-trude-b-feldman/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trude_Feldman

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:28 p.m. No.24213905   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3909 >>3913

Nope.

Not her

>>24213882

Another reporter that looks like her somewhat.

 

That clip is in This vid.

 

This can not be unseen once watched!

If you share, please give warnings.

Graphic FOOTAGE especially end vid with Epstein

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/V1YbsIjWNkLn

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:42 p.m. No.24213949   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3950 >>3964 >>3970 >>3984

Hey Q team, would you please let us know what the Heli’s on Wilshire event REALLY was and why decontaminate?

 

It is about time some shit be disclosed and this one always is in my craw.as a simple “military drill”..

Anons know it was not a drill.

https://youtu.be/-WE57lil1G8

Los Angeles - Helicopters - Black Hawk Pt. 1 (zoomed in, stabilized)

7,588 views · 6 years ago…more

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:42 p.m. No.24213950   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24213949

Four MH-6 helicopters and 2 Black Hawks land on Wilshire Blvd in Los Angeles Feb 2019. Footage of first Black Hawk stabilized, zoomed in and slowed down. Appears that two stretchers are brought on board. First one feet first. The MH-6s and first Black Hawk have no lights.

6 years ago

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:48 p.m. No.24213964   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3969 >>3970 >>3984 >>4615

Anons remember. All of the news teams were at Long Beach for the other military training.

They were not at this Wilshire event. They only showed the footage after the fact and lumped it in as “practice”. “Drills”…. This Wilshire event was REAL.

 

SPECIAL FORCES RAID VIA BLACKHAWK HELOS ON BIOLOGICAL WEAPON DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES

92,150 views · 6 years ago

#6016 #1stamendmentaudits #copwatch

…more

 

https://youtu.be/bGh32AKLia8

 

>>24213949

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:51 p.m. No.24213970   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3974 >>3978 >>3984 >>4615

>>24213964

>>24213949

Blackhawk Helicopters Storm Downtown Los Angeles 2-4-19. Military Raid, target unknown, evac.

19,645 views · 6 years ago…more

Military raid on down town Los algeles 2-4-19. Target unknown as they evac troops in several helicopters.

 

DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - Military helicopters were seen flying in formation around downtown Los Angeles and explosions were reported in the area that were all part of an exercise.

 

The choppers and explosions caused many people to head to social media, scared about what they were seeing outside.

 

Many people also tweeted that they saw the exercise in Silver Lake.

 

One helicopter even landed in the middle of Wilshire Boulevard and soldiers were seen rappelling out of the aircrafts onto rooftops.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Video by @AlexStrezev used with permission.

 

https://youtu.be/1SZuSagDFGE

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 7:54 p.m. No.24213978   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3984 >>3997

Who was here way back when this habbened…not Kun …but an anon other board.

 

>>24213970

 

MILITARY HELICOPTERS IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES

779,904 views · 6 years ago…more

 

Strezev

1.04K

 

Subscribe

 

11K

 

Feel free to use the video as you please. Just please credit me. @AlexStrezev

 

 

Comments5.5K

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:03 p.m. No.24214008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4009

You can see people on opposite side of the street on roofs near blue thin behind them. I bet they filmed this. Closer to the street level.

 

I have never seen footage from that side of the road which would see the guys coming out of the buildings. This is downtown Los Angeles and everyone has their cameras.

 

Why no vids from that perspective ever released by these onlookers?

>>24213984

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:35 p.m. No.24214164   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4171 >>4185 >>4187 >>4196 >>4431 >>4515 >>4606

Always sauce your poast fag.

>>24214064

https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/what-if-trump-is-painfully-right-stephen-nagy-for-inside-policy/

 

What if Trump is painfully right?: Stephen Nagy for Inside Policy

Trump’s methods offend, but his diagnosis of freeloading allies and a failing international order may be uncomfortably closer to reality.

 

February 2, 2026 in Foreign Affairs, Inside Policy, Foreign Policy, Latest News, Indo-Pacific, North America, Stephen Nagy Reading Time: 5 mins read

By Stephen Nagy, February 2, 2026

 

Few allies and partners of the United States want Donald Trump to be right. His methods are cruel, his rhetoric exhausting, his personalization of diplomacy genuinely dangerous. When Prime Minister Mark Carney received a standing ovation in Davos for defending multilateralism after flying to Beijing to sign agreements with Xi Jinping, the global commentariat cheered precisely because it represented everything Trump is not – elegant, principled, institutionally minded.

 

But wanting Trump to be wrong is not the same as him being wrong. And the uncomfortable possibility Canadian policymakers and other allies and partners of the US must now confront is that beneath the bluster, the threats, and the performative chaos, Trump may have identified something true about the world that Carney’s vision obscures.

 

The core of Trump’s worldview is brutally simple. For Trump, the postwar international order became a mechanism for transferring American wealth and security to partners who offered little in return. Allies enjoyed protection while underspending on defence. Trading partners accessed American consumers while protecting domestic industries. China exploited every opening the liberal order provided to become a strategic rival funded by Western investment and technology transfer. This is not a sophisticated argument. It lacks nuance, ignores American benefits from the system, and treats complex relationships as simple ledgers. But the sophisticated arguments that dismissed these concerns for decades produced the present situation – where America’s principal strategic competitor grew powerful enough to threaten the order itself while allies remained dependent and underinvested. The experts were subtle and the experts were wrong.

 

Michael Beckley and Hal Brands made a version of this case in Foreign Affairs, arguing that assumptions about convergence and integration were always more aspirational than analytical. China did not liberalize. The Global South did not adopt Western norms. Russia did not become a satisfied partner. The institutions Carney celebrates were designed for a world that never fully arrived. Trump lacks the vocabulary to articulate this, but his instincts point toward the same conclusion. The system stopped working, and pretending otherwise benefits everyone except Americans asked to sustain it. When he demands that allies pay more, contribute more, and align more closely with American strategic priorities, he is not abandoning alliances. He is insisting they function as alliances rather than as charity.

Cont:

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:37 p.m. No.24214171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4185 >>4187 >>4196 >>4431 >>4515 >>4606

>>24214064

 

>>24214164

Cont:

Canada illustrates the problem precisely. The Commission on Foreign Interference documented years of Chinese influence operations – intimidation of diaspora communities, cultivation of elected officials, economic espionage – met with systematic Canadian inaction. Ottawa knew and did little. Defence spending remains below NATO commitments despite decades of promises. Arctic security is underfunded despite Russian and Chinese interest in the region. When Trump treats Canada as unreliable, he is not manufacturing grievance. He is responding to a documented record of a country that enjoyed American security guarantees while failing to secure itself against the very adversary America now confronts. This is not paranoia dressed as policy. It is observation.

 

Carney’s Davos speech offered an alternative vision, middle powers banding together to uphold rules, constrain great power excess, and preserve space for independent action. It sounds appealing. It flatters countries like Canada by suggesting their preferences matter independently of their power. But the Lowy Institute’s Asia Power Index offers a corrective. Canada sits at the lower end of middle power rankings, behind Japan, Australia, India, and South Korea. Rising states like Indonesia and the UAE are gaining ground while traditional middle powers stagnate. The coalition Carney imagines may lack the collective weight his strategy assumes. More fundamentally, middle power coalitions historically succeeded when underwritten by a great power willing to absorb costs on their behalf. That great power was America. Trump is explicitly unwilling to continue the arrangement on previous terms. Carney’s vision requires a sponsor who no longer wishes to play that role.

 

Then there is China itself. Carney’s Beijing visit assumed Canada could balance between great powers, maintaining productive relationships with both Washington and Beijing while preserving freedom of manoeuvre. Research from the Central European Institute of Asian Studies on Chinese economic statecraft suggests this middle path may be illusory. Beijing punishes countries that cross its interests regardless of prior engagement – export bans, tourism restrictions, regulatory harassment applied suddenly and without appeal. Japan, Australia, South Korea, and others discovered that economic interdependence with China creates vulnerability, not leverage. Canada has now positioned itself to face American tariffs for courting Beijing and eventual Chinese coercion when interests inevitably diverge over Taiwan, technology, or territorial disputes. The balanced position Carney seeks may not exist as a stable equilibrium. It may simply be a way station between alignment choices that cannot be permanently deferred.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:41 p.m. No.24214185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4187 >>4196 >>4515 >>4606

>>24214064

 

>>24214164

 

>>24214171

Cont:

 

Trump’s transactional approach violates every norm of alliance management. It treats partners as contractors rather than friends, measures relationships in dollars rather than shared values, and substitutes threat for persuasion. These are genuine costs. Kori Schake’s recent Foreign Affairs essay argued that America under Trump is becoming neither feared nor loved – merely unreliable. Allies are learning to hedge, diversify, and doubt. But this critique assumes the previous arrangement was sustainable, that allies would eventually meet their commitments voluntarily, that China would moderate with engagement, that institutions would address their own failures given enough time and goodwill. If none of that was true – if allies were already free-riding, if China was already exploiting openness, if institutions were already failing their stated purposes – then Trump’s disruption is less vandalism than demolition of a condemned structure. Breaking what no longer works may be prerequisite to building something that does.

 

The hardest part of this argument is separating Trump’s possible correctness about the world from his obvious unfitness to navigate it. He may be right that allies have underinvested. He may be right that China exploited Western naïveté. He may be right that multilateral institutions became mechanisms for diffusing responsibility rather than solving problems. None of this means his methods will produce better outcomes. Cruelty alienates. Unpredictability frightens. Personalized grievance substitutes ego for strategy. Trump could be directionally correct about the failures of the old order while being catastrophically wrong about how to build a new one. These possibilities are not mutually exclusive.

 

I do not admire Trump’s methods. The cruelty is real, the damage to diplomatic relationships genuine, the risks of miscalculation heightened by his chaotic approach to statecraft. But strategy must be judged by whether it aligns with reality, not whether it pleases editorial boards or conference audiences. Carney offered a vision that earned applause in Davos. Trump offered threats that earned condemnation everywhere polite people gather. The question is which better describes the world as it actually operates – a world where middle powers can chart independent courses through rhetorical solidarity and institutional loyalty, or a world where power remains concentrated, choices remain binary, and countries like Canada must ultimately align with the great power on whose security and market access they fundamentally depend.

 

Nobody wants Trump to be right. The possibility offends. But wanting is not analysis, and offence is not refutation. The painful possibility that Canadian policymakers must sit with is that Trump’s crude assessment of allies, adversaries, and the failing international order may be closer to truth than the elegant alternative Carney presented to standing ovations in Switzerland. Sometimes the rude guest sees what the polite ones have agreed not to mention.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m. No.24214187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4196 >>4431 >>4515 >>4606

>>24214064

>>24214164

>>24214171

>>24214185

Author is a pusyy.

< Nobody wants Trump to be right. The possibility offends?

> Stephen R. Nagy is professor of politics and international studies at the International Christian University. Concurrently, he holds appointments as a senior fellow and China project lead at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and a visiting fellow at the Japan Institute for International Affairs. The title of his forthcoming book is Japan as a Middle Power State: Navigating Ideological and Systemic Divides.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:46 p.m. No.24214198   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24214196

Yuck

 

> When Prime Minister Mark Carney received a standing ovation in Davos for defending multilateralism after flying to Beijing to sign agreements with Xi Jinping, the global commentariat cheered precisely because it represented everything Trump is not – elegant, principled, institutionally minded.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:47 p.m. No.24214201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4206 >>4207 >>4431 >>4515 >>4606

>>24214064

But wanting Trump to be wrong is not the same as him being wrong.

And the uncomfortable possibility Canadian policymakers and other allies and partners of the US must now confront is that beneath the bluster, the threats, and the performative chaos, Trump may have identified something true about the world that Carney’s vision obscures.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. No.24214207   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4216

>>24214201

>>24214064

The core of Trump’s worldview is brutally simple.

For Trump, the postwar international order became a mechanism for transferring American wealth and security to partners who offered little in return. Allies enjoyed protection while underspending on defence. Trading partners accessed American consumers while protecting domestic industries. China exploited every opening the liberal order provided to become a strategic rival funded by Western investment and technology transfer. This is not a sophisticated argument. It lacks nuance, ignores American benefits from the system, and treats complex relationships as simple ledgers. But the sophisticated arguments that dismissed these concerns for decades produced the present situation – where America’s principal strategic competitor grew powerful enough to threaten the order itself while allies remained dependent and underinvested. The experts were subtle and the experts were wrong.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:50 p.m. No.24214216   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24214207

>>24214064

Michael Beckley and Hal Brands made a version of this case in Foreign Affairs, arguing that assumptions about convergence and integration were always more aspirational than analytical. China did not liberalize. The Global South did not adopt Western norms. Russia did not become a satisfied partner. The institutions Carney celebrates were designed for a world that never fully arrived. Trump lacks the vocabulary to articulate this, but

his instincts point toward the same conclusion. The system stopped working, and pretending otherwise benefits everyone except Americans asked to sustain it.

When he demands that allies pay more, contribute more, and align more closely with American strategic priorities, he is not abandoning alliances.

He is insisting they function as alliances rather than as charity.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:52 p.m. No.24214221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4226

>>24214064

The Noticing

 

When Trump treats Canada as unreliable, he is not manufacturing grievance. He is responding to a documented record of a country that enjoyed American security guarantees while failing to secure itself against the very adversary America now confronts. This is not paranoia dressed as policy. It is observation.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 8:59 p.m. No.24214249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4258

>>24214064

>>24214238

Nobody wants Trump to be right. The possibility offends. But wanting is not analysis, and offence is not refutation.

 

The

painful

possibility that Canadian policymakers must sit with is that

Trump’s crude assessment of allies, adversaries, and the failing international order may be closer to truth than the elegant alternative Carney presented

to standing ovations in Switzerland.

 

Sometimes the rude guest sees what the polite ones have agreed not to mention.

 

 

Trump. Autist. Kek

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 9:09 p.m. No.24214282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4295 >>4322

>>24214274

>>24214267

Everyone is waking up in huge numbers and the searches regarding Epstein prove this.

Every day moar and moar awake.

Q team is doing this all methodically.

When the time comes and everyone is listening it is going to get Insane for a long while.

Anonymous ID: 2ddd57 Feb. 3, 2026, 9:18 p.m. No.24214308   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4431 >>4515 >>4606

Guthrie HOAX.

 

Reminder:

 

Episode 1241 Scott Adams: How the Fake News Industry Manufactures HOAXES, Today's Fresh Example

39,596 views · Streamed 5 years ago…more

 

Content:

---

 

John McCain bribery claim

 

Employees at Google forming a union for what?

 

Lin Wood tweets

 

Data Integrity Group's intriguing claim

 

President Trump's call to Brad Raffensperger

 

Whiteboard: Hoax Creation

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/live/rb6x0fCYD3Q?si=BukcnWLdc1p3Fatl