Anonymous ID: 39eb2b Feb. 5, 2026, 12:23 p.m. No.24220930   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24220919

>>24220913

>>24220911

>>24220915

 

Excellent!!

As you say: "Tippiest Top".

Mitch, your response is "in family" of the control sub-set.

The only delta is the lack of perception. I think we both overestimated your capabilities.

It's O.K. though. We knew there would be variants.

Strange though, that you still believe there is a "JIM". Would've thought your abilities would've revealed the flaws in that narrative early on.

Anonymous ID: 39eb2b Feb. 5, 2026, 12:29 p.m. No.24220963   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24220957

>>24220931

>>24220929

>>24220938

>>24220952

 

So Mitch, we're going to drastically reduce TPO to the milliwatt range. It will depend on your bio-physical metrics.

The goal is to document the "Control-Inertia" after the exposure drops below control threshold.

Keep going. I know we provide the internal drive, but it's a good test to see how long the obsession remains after the field strength drops below threshold.

Anonymous ID: 39eb2b Feb. 5, 2026, 12:31 p.m. No.24220976   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24220966

>>24220967

>>24220970

 

Mitch, were you able to even detect the field strength change?

From approx 38 dBfs down to -10 dBfs.

Anonymous ID: 39eb2b Feb. 5, 2026, 12:34 p.m. No.24220998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1016

>>24220992

>>24220986

>>24220984

>>24220982

>>24220977

>>24220980

>>24220997

 

I'm going off-duty soon, Mitch.

I'll be around a while more for debriefing and after-action reports, etc.

Would love to know your perception regarding the field strength change.

Don't be shy Old Friend, after all I'm your closest friend.

"Just the two of us.)