The Dark Reality Behind Government UFO DisinformationOur government uses Active Disinformation
15:56
https://youtu.be/XLcQQlwEsi4
This guy worked in Trump’s first term, in gov
“We Have 740 Military Bases” - The U.S. Military Empire Explained in Under 15 Minutes==
Shawn Ryan show
12:51
>>24230177. Really don’t need your opinion
FCC launching probe into ABC's 'The View' amid crackdown on equal time for candidates
'Fake News is not getting a free pass anymore,' an FCC source told Fox News Digital
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn ,
Published February 6, 2026
FIRST ON FOX — The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is launching an investigation into ABC's "The View" amid the agency's crackdown on equal time for political candidates, Fox News Digital has learned.
Last month, the FCC announced it will require the broadcast networks to adhere to the "statutory equal opportunities requirement," citing the Communications Act of 1934, "including their airing of late-night and daytime talk shows."
A source at the FCC told Fox News Digital that Monday's"View" appearance by Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico triggered the probe.
Talarico was among the first political candidates to appear on "The View" since the FCC announced its crackdown.
There has been a longstanding "bona fide" exception for news programming that wouldn't require equal time for an opposing candidate,but the FCC now says it "has not been presented with any evidencethat the interview portion of any late-night or daytime televisiontalk show program on the air presently would qualify for the 'bona fide' news exemption."
ABC's parent company, Disney, never made an equal-time filing to the FCC regarding Talarico's recent appearance, which would implicitly indicate to the FCC that Disney believes "The View" is bona fide news and would be exempt from the policy, the source said.
The equal opportunity requirement applies to all legally filed candidates on a ballot regardless of political party, meaning all eligible Democratic primary candidates would require equal time. Notably, Talarico received roughly nine minutes of airtime in one segment while his top primary rival, Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, had roughly 17 minutes of airtime across three segments during her appearance on "The View" last month.
Crockett's appearance came before the FCC announced its policy enforcement.
The source noted that not only would ABC require equal airtime for Republican candidates on the ballot like incumbent Republican Texas Sen. John Cornyn and his primary rivals. It would also apply to Ahmad Hassan, the little-known candidate running against Talarico and Crockett in the Democratic primary.
"Fake news is not getting a free pass anymore," the source told Fox News Digital.
A representative for ABC News did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
In a recent interview with Fox News Digital, FCC ChairmanBrendan Carr defended the policy push, stressing that the law he's enforcing "goes back to the 1950s."
"On my watch, we're going to enforce this regulation,"Carr said.
Carr indicated that candidates don't necessarily have to appear on the exact programs for the networks to adhere to the policy, meaning they could either appear on a news program or the network can air their campaign ads as a supplement.
Late-night hosts Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert have lashed out at the policy push.
Kimmel called it a "threat" while Colbert accused the FCC of trying to "silence" him and his liberal colleagues.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/fcc-launching-probe-abcs-the-view-amid-crackdown-equal-time-candidates
Joseph A. Wulfsohn is a media reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to joseph.wulfsohn@fox.com and on Twitter: @JosephWulfsohn.
Trump Administration to Make It Easier to Fire 50,000 Federal Workers 1/2
A rule issued on Thursday would create a government-employee category that offers fewer job protections
WASHINGTON—The Trump administration is planning tomake it easier to discipline—and potentially fire—career officials in senior positionsacross the government, a move that would affect roughly 50,000 federal workers.
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which oversees the federal workforce, issued a final ruleon Thursday thatcreates a category of worker for high-ranking career employees whose work focuses on executing the administration’s policies. Workers who fall into that category would no longer be subject to rules that for decades have set a high bar for firing federal employees.
While political appointees at agencies are considered at-will employees who serve at the discretion of the president,career employees have long enjoyed strong job protections, including the ability to appeal firings, suspensions, or disciplinary action to an independent board. Workers that fall under the new category wouldn’t be able to appeal to the board.
The change is part of afar-reaching effort by the administration to overhaul federal agencies and reduce the size of the government’s workforce. Senior political appointees, spurred on by President Trump’slongstanding contention that a “deep state” is undermining his agenda, have shut down government programs, fired thousands of employees and offered others voluntary separation agreements.
Office of Personnel Management officials said therule is aimed in part at disciplining federal workers who stand in the way of Trump’s policies. OPM said thenew category applies to senior positions that are policy-determining, policymaking or policy-advocating in nature.
“People can’t be conscientious objectors in the workforcein a way where it interferes with their ability to carry out their mission,” OPM Director Scott Kupor said in an interview. “When conscientious objection becomes sabotageor trying to find ways to thwart the objectives of the administration—that is not allowed.”
Federal worker unions worry that Trump’s advisers could use the new rules as a pretext to oust government workers whose political views are at odds with the president’s. Some union officials have warned that the administration could seek to significantly expand the number of federal workers who fall into the new category.
“This rule is a direct assault on a professional, nonpartisan, merit-based civil service and the government services the American people rely on every day,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 employees.
https://archive.is/6PzTp
2/2
The roughly 50,000 employeesthat OPM sayscould be affected by the rule change account for a relatively small subsectionof the2.3 million people working for the federal government in civilian jobs.
Changes to the civil service put in place in the 19th century turned federal employment from a partisan spoils system into a professional workforce that is largely insulated from partisan interference.
OPM officials said the administration won’t discipline employees based on their political party or ask who they voted for. They said the rule won’t be used as a justification for mass layoffs, adding that the administration will adhere to federal rules that protect whistleblowers.
Senior officials at government agencies haveassembled lists of positions that are eligible for the new employment category establishedunder the rule. OPM officials said they would complete thefull list within 30 daysof the release of the new rule.Trumpis then expected toissue an executive orderthat places specific positions in the new category.
OPM officials said therule follows through on an executive order signed by Trump on the first dayof his second term that called for theimplementation of merit-based government serviceto “prevent the hiring of individuals who are unwilling to defend the Constitution or to faithfully serve the Executive Branch.”
Shortly before leaving officeat the end of his first term, Trump issued an executive orderthat made similar changes to how federal workers are classified. President JoeBiden rescinded the executive order.
The final rulecites several examples of behavior that could result in disciplinary action, including leaks to the media to subvert policy. It cites an email thatan Equal Employment Opportunity Commission administrative judge sent to then-acting EEOC Chair Andrea Lucasand all EEOC employees shortly after Trump was inaugurated,saying: “I will not participate in attempts to target private citizens and colleagues through the recent illegal executive orders.”
“If you’ve announced to all of your co-workers that you hate the administration…and then you perform badly at your job and you don’t do anything,” Kupor said, “the fact that you said you’re going to resist to all of your co-workers is something that could be taken into account.”
The Government Accountability Project andNational Active and Retired Federal Employees Association sued the Trump administration last year, after Trump signed the executive order that led to the rule that was published on Thursday. The group said the administration’s planned move ignores a 1978 law that provides job protections to career federal employeesand limits at-will employment to political appointees. (So gov can’t be fired but the US Department of Labor that all businesses and states can fire at will, why is the Federal Government exempt from the law?)
“It will be much easier for the administration to squelch dissent or to thwart the work of civil servants who are trying to ensure that they are performing due diligence when it comes to policy development,” said Love Rutledge, a coach for federal employees.
https://archive.is/6PzTp
CIA
SPOTLIGHTING THE WORLD FACTBOOK AS WE BID A FOND FAREWELL
February 4, 2026
One of CIA’s oldest and most recognizable intelligence publications, The World Factbook, has sunset. The World Factbook served the Intelligence Community and the general publicas a longstanding, one-stop basic reference about countries and communities around the globe. Let’s take a quick look into the history of The World Factbook.
Over many decades, The World Factbook evolved from a classified to unclassified, hardcopy to electronic product that added new categories, and even new global entities. The original classified publication, titledThe National Basic Intelligence Factbook, launched in 1962. The first unclassified companion version was issued in 1971. A decade later it was renamed The World Factbook. In 1997, The World Factbook went digital and debuted to a worldwide audience on CIA.gov, where it garnered millions of views each year.
The World Factbook appealed to researchers, news organizations, teachers, students, and international travelers. Some readers even inquired whether their preferred geographic designation or world entity could be included on the high-profile site.
Finally,only CIA insiders would know that officers donated some of their personal travel photos to The World Factbook, which hosted more than 5,000 photographs that were copyright-free for anyone to access and use.
Though the World Factbook is gone, in the spirit of its global reach and legacy, we hope you will stay curious about the world and find ways to explore it… in person or virtually.
https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/spotlighting-the-world-factbook-as-we-bid-a-fond-farewell/
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
Minneapolis protest update: solidarity looks weird. Anti-ICE folks swinging dildos at each other, “I’m on your f***ing side.”
Yeah, makes total sense.
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
6h
🇺🇸NOW: Riot police deployed at Whipple Federal Building, Minnesota. Anti-ICE protesters on scene.
This is how these go: protests, police lines, standoff.
Either it disperses or arrests start to happen
.x.com/MarioNawfal/st…
4:02 PM · Feb 7, 2026
·
198.7K
Views
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2020241658294530433?s=20
'White saviors'' use of whistles causes bitter internal rift inside anti-ICE movement
Organizations from Seattle to Maryland tell predominantly White activists to quit 'White Savior' behavior during ICE operations
Asra Q. Nomani By Asra Q. Nomani Fox News
Published February 7, 2026 6:27am EST
Immigrant groups have a message for their mostly White allies: Quit blowing the whistle on ICE.
Fox News Digital has reviewed days of messagesinside Signal chat rooms that reveal that a new internal feud has erupted inside the anti-ICE protest industry, pitting immigrant-led organizations against predominately White "rapid response" networks that have made whistle-blowing a dramatic part of anti-ICE protests.
In one dismissal, a "rapid responder" in Seattle reported back that "immigrant networks are being weird."
Groups from Seattle to Montgomery County, Md., are telling mostly White "rapid responders" to back off a dynamic described by activists as "White Savior," reminding them they are not cameo actors in an "action movie" against ICE.
This past weekend, the Washington Immigrant Solidarity Network — known locally as "WAISN," a Seattle-based, immigrant-led organization, publicly rebuked the practice of whistles, setting off a backlash inside mostly White liberal activist "rapid response" circles.
"WHY WAISN RAPID RESPONSE DOES NOT USE WHISTLES," the group wrote in an Instagram post, emphasizing, "We show up with care and accountability, not noise or panic."
"It is not about being the loudest, the bravest, or the most visible person on the scene or confronting immigration agents. It is a commitment to non-violence, discipline and harm reduction, centering the well-being of the most vulnerable immigrant and refugee committees in Washington," the post continued.
The message amounted to a blunt directive: Put away the whistles.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/white-saviors-use-whistles-causes-bitter-internal-rift-inside-anti-ice-movement
Becca Brannon
@RebsBrannon
TENSE MOMENT as Minnesota State Troopers charge onto Anti-Ice Protesters in a second round of multiple arrests after an unlawful assembly had been declared.
It was a free-for-all, I was grabbed twice, but ultimately let go after showing my Press badge.
4:06 PM · Feb 7, 2026
·
41.2K
Views
https://x.com/RebsBrannon/status/2020242875586605369?s=20