Depends on how Clair their voyancy is
I'm not though, I just saw the first post. I wasn't the only one.
>convention of states
How to get the People educated enuff to care about what dis is and the need fo it???
What if I never told you your history? What if I lied to you for succeeding generations? How could you ever know? You couldn’t. You would just have to trust me. The whole model of your world would be a fabrication built upon a falsehood. There are clues. They are ignored. They are never explained. They are never questioned. The lie manifests itself to ever greater proportions until it consumes us. It is like that with the ‘United States’ whatever that is. It appears, however, it was supposed to be a city state as opposed to a nation state with set boundaries. Over the years the stone markers decayed into obscurity. The border was never taught and never observed. The stone markers decayed and fell into the obscurity of Orwell’s memory hole. When I saw one once, everything made instant sense. The District of Columbia was never meant to exercise ‘jurisdiction’ over the States. It was meant to exist within one hundred square miles of territory given by the States of Virginia and Maryland.
United States Boundary Stone
To even a fool the intent of the boundary stone is clearly obvious. The ‘United States’ only has JURISDICTION within the ten miles square. In almost every account that is NOT spoken of, or it is glossed over. The stones are located and described in detail. The ceremonies, though wholly Masonic, are described for posterity, but no one tells you what is plainly written upon the stone that the ‘United States’ is one hundred square miles of territory, and that the States are sovereign. In this 1897 treatise on the Boundary Markers at the end of page 3 and the start of page 4, the story is told.
Each of the four faces bears an inscription. The face fronting Virginia or Maryland bears the name VIRGINIA or MARYLAND respectively. The opposite face, however, does not bear the name District of Columbia, but in bold capitals the words JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES, for which reason I have heard these monuments spoken as “jurisdiction stones.” This peculiar and unusual inscription is interesting and suggestive. It throws strong light on the times and temper of those ordering the inscription. The colonies had but recently emerged from a prolonged and bitter struggle for freedom. Each new-fledged was therefore jealous of the freedom so dearly bought and was loth to give up any of its jurisdiction to any person, natural or artificial. When, therefore, jurisdiction was actually ceded to the sovereign states but just united, exclusive jurisdiction was given to these united states with misgiving and reluctance and to the extent of “not to exceed ten miles square.” When the survey began in 1791 this territory, over which the United States might exercise exclusive jurisdiction, was nameless; so was also the city to be created within it, which hitherto had been spoken of as the Federal City. But when, in the autumn of 1791, the survey approached or reached its end and a map or plot was to be made, the question arose as to the names. The three commissioners then formally resolved that it should be The City of Washington, in the Territory of Columbia. Possibly some of the stones were planted, or at least marked, before this conclusion was reached. However, it may be, Columbia does not appear on any monument, but the more important fact is recorded that here, and here only, it may be added, the jurisdiction of the United States was at that time absolute and unqualified.
I would suffice it to say that the United States whether as a corporation or city state was relegated to the confines of what was known as the ten miles square. I would surmise the real cause of the U.S. Civil War was the usurpation of the United States exceeding the boundaries to the point where certain sovereign states said enough is enough. There was the Fort Sumter shot and a long, arduous struggle ensued. The Union or United States was victorious in usurping powers it was never meant to have. Like a cancer it spread through the States as tyrant and master. The latest round in the perpetual civil war is the mopping up operation. The United States wishes to disarm the States for the final occupation. It used a psychological operation at a school to achieve this. It hopes to solicit your permission to destroy the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment by stealth. The plan is succeeding because no one knows the limits of federal authority. The stones are monuments to a history where a border was erased. President Obama has exceeded the mandates given to the District of Columbia. The concessions given to the bankers for a city state are loath to consume the sovereign states. When push comes to shove, you will at least know which side of the line you are standing on by the JURISDICTION it has.
Use of the ZIP Code is voluntary. See Domestic Mail Services Regulations, Section 122.32. You should also know that the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the ZIP Code. Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403, (Public Law 91-375). The federal government utilizes the ZIP code to prove that you reside in a “federal district of the District of Columbia”. This is why the IRS and other government agencies (state and federal) require a ZIP Code when they assert jurisdiction by sending you a letter. They claim that this speeds the mail, but this is a sly and subtle TRICK. It is also PRIMA FACIE evidence that you are a subject of Congress and a “citizen of the District of Columbia” who is “resident” in one of the several States.
Zip Code Digits
The receipt of mail with a ZIP code is one of the requirements for the IRS to have jurisdiction to send you notices. The government cannot bill a state Citizen, as he/she is not within the purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the District of Columbia. In fact, the Internal Revenue Service has adopted the ZIP code areas as Internal Revenue Districts. See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday, March 19, 1986.
You must remember that the Postal Service is a private corporation, a quasi-governmental agency. It is no longer a full government agency. It is like the Federal Reserve System, The Internal Revenue Service, and the United States Marshall Service. They are all outside the restrictions of the Federal Constitution, as private corporations. They are all powerful in their respective areas of responsibility to enforce collection for the federal debt. So, if you are using a ZIP code, you are in effect saying openly and notoriously that you do not live in the State of [your state], but, instead are a resident in the [your state] area of the District of Columbia (a federal district). There are some so-called Patriot groups that I consider to be patriots for money. They advocate the use of Title 42 suits (which are for federal citizens only), send mail to you with a ZIP Code, and ask you to do things that place you within the municipal jurisdiction of the District of Columbia.
Remember these individuals may be agents of the government or, even worse, are advocating a one-world government by the use of the Social Security number and the ZIP code.
So you must be aware of the movement towards a one-world government through annihilation or elimination of State Citizens by use of the so-called 14th Amendment and its related laws.
This movement can be halted by the efforts of everyone to return to the status of Primary State Citizens. By becoming a State Citizen and not a citizen of the United States you can get the federal government off your back and out of your billfold.
I myself want the Original Constitution for the United States of America put back in force, as applied against the federal government, and the States restored to their original status as Republics.
So, all you have to do is to study and determine your status, whether you are a “slave” and a second class citizen (commonly referred to as a “federal citizen”) or a State Citizen of your state. You must decide who and what you are!
Change of "Zoning" on Paper and then an assumption over all those who use said Zoning.
"Not our fault you didn't know how we were assuming this definition…"
Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th Amendment, there was no legal definition of a “citizen of the United States”, as everyone had primary citizenship in one of the several states. The Constitution referred to the sovereign state citizen, and no one else. Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside the several states were commonly called “citizens of the United States.” In the Constitution for the United States, the term was used to identify state citizens who were eligible under the suffrage laws to hold office, and they were required under the Constitution to have primary allegiance to one of the several states.
Since that term was not specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution, Congress in 1868 took advantage of this term and utilized it in the so-called 14th Amendment to describe a NEW type of “citizen” whose primary allegiance was to the federal government, i.e. Washington, D.C. and not to one of the several states of the union. Thus, using the term as used in the U.S. Constitution to mislead and confuse the people as to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution.
Many people have mistaken the citizen as denominated in the 14th Amendment to mean the same one in the original constitution, this is in error. The “citizen of the united states” as used in the constitution is not the same as the citizen of the United States used after the 14th Amendment. So all the elected officials are NOT sitting in the office constitutionally, they are merely impostors created by the 14th Amendment. The current President, is a U.S. citizen, and therefore not the “citizen of the united states” defined in the Constitution for the United States, neither the federal senators nor any congressmen are seated constitutionally. These facts being true, then all the federal laws are invalid for want of constitutionality.
The 14th Amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States. It had long been contended, and had been held by many learned authorities, and had never been judicially decided to the contrary, that there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States, except by first becoming a citizen of some state. United States v. Anthony (1874), 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (No. 14,459), 830.
We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several states. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a citizen of a state, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other. U. S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
In other words, you do not have to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a state citizen. This was held to be true by the Maryland Supreme Court in 1966 wherein the state:
Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state. Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)
The federal government was never given any authority to encroach upon the private affairs of the citizens in the several states of the union, unless they were involved in import or export activity, neither were they given authority to reach a citizen of Germany living in Germany. In fact, the states could refuse to enforce any act of congress, that they felt was outside the intent of the granting of limited powers to the federal government. This is called interposition or nullification. Several state supreme courts have in the past refused to uphold federal laws within their states.
Also relevant,
Before we can talk about ‘Freedom’ we must first understand how and why it is withheld from us and most people don’t even see it!
Mark Emery (Founder of the Lighthouse Law Club) has written a short article which is illustrative of how we become the chattel property of government without even knowing it. Please read the article for your own understanding. If you are already aware of this, as I know many of us are, then be aware of this article as a handy reference to use when trying to get others to understand, if it ever comes up in conversation…
Two Sides of The Law
Did you know… that there are two sides of the law? There is ‘the public side’ which is the one you are most likely operating in which subjects you to federal mandates, incessant regulations, fines, fees, penalties, jail and even death.
‘The Private Side’ is available to everyone and provides an escape from ‘public law’. However, nobody will talk about it because it’s deemed a ‘threat’ to the ‘system’. The mafia doesn’t like competition you know!
OK here’s a little tidbit for you to ponder… A ‘license’ or ‘permit’ is a limited permission to do that which is otherwise illegal.
Question #1… when did it become ‘illegal’ to get married? Don’t you need a ‘license’?
Question #2…when did it become illegal to repair your own home? Don’t you need a ‘permit’?
….and why to I need to pay someone else for their permission to manage my own affairs and my own property?
We (Americans) don’t get rights ‘from’ the constitution as so many people mistakenly say. The constitution was created to ‘protect’ our naturally endowed God given rights and to bind down the hands of mischievous men in power so that they could NOT infringe upon those rights that are bestowed upon us by God.
So the last question of the day is: “So then why are our servants and representatives ignoring those limitations and creating civil strife against the people (their masters) with constant harassment and police powers?” The answer is as clear as black and white and you will be surprised. It’s not ‘them’ that are in error. It’s you!
Let me set up the scenario so we can understand this a little better. Let’s say I have a little private island in the middle of the ocean and I want to do business. But there are no customers. I see a cruise ship going by every day. I want those people to be my customers, and not just for a ‘day visit’, but forever. So, to get the men interested, I offer plenty of cute island girls and free beer. To get the women interested, I offer free spa and beauty treatments and unlimited free shoes of all kinds!
So word gets out and the cruise clients demand that the ship stop along the way which it soon does to keep their cruise business going and their customers happy. As people enter the island we have immigration checkpoint of course. To get on the island, I have everyone sign a contract which basically says that they give up all natural rights at the shoreline, and on the island they must abide by all commercial regulations on the island. And when the people leave the island, the terms of the contract say that ‘the person’ must abide by the same rules henceforth, wherever they go.
Now, of course law doesn’t normally work this way as there are jurisdictional issues. To get around this, I know I can’t control John Smith when he goes home to Kentucky. So, I’ll get John Smith to admit that he is JOHN SMITH, which by operation of law is another ‘legal person’. And as long as John Smith, thinks he’s JOHN SMITH, he’ll have to send me money whenever I send JOHN SMITH a bill because it’s in the contract and he agreed to it.
The people don’t care, and they don’t understand anyway at first. They just want island girls, free beer and free shoes! They say ‘yeah, yeah, whatever…’ and sign the contract to get on the island to get their benefits. Knowing that ‘no law can abrogate the rights of contract’, I’m feeling pretty good that I’m getting shiploads of new customers every day who are committing to me for life, by contract.
My fees, taxes and other business I take in more than pays for the beer and shoes I give away and now with this business model, I can show investors a steady stream of incoming new customers. With my accounting books and cash flow I can now borrow huge amounts of money to build my empire, enforce my contracts, and grow, grow grow! My little island business is a HUGE success!
So then, in reality, my little ‘island business’ is only 10 miles square in area and surrounded by Virginia and Maryland. Yep, the UNITED STATES government, which is not to be confused with the republic of the united ‘States of America’. It’s spelled this way with small ‘u’ because the word ‘united’ here is used as an ‘adjective’, not part of the name. It describes the noun which is the governmental unit for the ‘States of America’, which are supreme on the ‘Private Side’ of the law.
This is a not so small and very important distinction. The ‘republic’ is the de jure, or ‘lawful’ government where the private side of the law i.e. your God given rights and constitutional limitations on government, are operational.
The UNITED STATES is a corporate entity governed by corporate bylaws i.e. legislation for its corporate members and all those who volunteer into its jurisdiction by way of contract!
In the old days of the republic, when babies were born, the permanent record of birth was made in the family bible, the name listed as John Smith, and it was witnessed by those present for authentication. Under the new system, people apply for the BIRTH CERTIFICATE which creates our legal, juristic person: JOHN SMITH in place of John Smith and immediately, as a baby there are two people born. The living breathing person, and the fictitious ‘trust’ entity (legal person) which will serve ‘my island business’.
Now, since 1933, when House Joint Resolution 192 removed ‘lawful money’ from circulation and there was no more money to ‘pay’ for things (i.e. gold and silver) a whole new system emerged. At that time, the medium of exchange became ‘credit’ or ‘promises to pay’ (i.e. Federal Reserve Note). All we get are ‘promises to pay’ which never get paid (at law) and so by operation of law, this ‘benefit’ which is the privilege of ‘discharging’ the liability of a debt (not actually paying for it by law) brings us under the purview of ‘the laws of commerce’ in all that we do. Commerce of course is regulated. THE UNTED STATES then makes everything a ‘commercial activity’ for JOHN SMITH which allows it to regulate JOHN SMITH from cradle to grave and JOHN SMITH pays fees, registrations, fines, taxes and incurs potential criminal penalties if he doesn’t follow the corporate by laws i.e. Federal regs.
So now are you starting to see the lines of distinction between the ‘Private’ side of the law and the ‘Public’ side?
And so now let’s go back to the benefits. They tell us, “You need the birth certificate in order to enroll your child in school, and to get a job, and to enroll in Social security, and, and, and…” Before you know it, you have so many ‘adhesion contracts’ (non-negotiable) with the island business, you are completely wrapped up and can never claim your God given right’s because they are superseded by your ‘voluntary agreement’ when you applied for benefits and entered into ‘contract’ with THE UNITED STATES.
This is why ‘the constitution’ no longer applies to most people. Just like Esau gave up his inheritance for a bowl of porridge in the book of Genesis, most of us have done the same thing. Nearly all courts in the UNITED STATES are courts of ‘Admiralty’ jurisdiction. They are administrative tribunals administering the bankruptcy of THE UNITED STATES (bankrupt since they removed the ‘lawful money’ in HJR 192). The courts are there only to administer the contract under bankruptcy laws. They are NOT there to protect your rights. They have no jurisdiction or authority over that. It’s not that the judge is ‘bad’, he or she is only following the rules of the court in Admiralty. So if you demand constitutional rights in a contract court of Admiralty, then ‘you’ are the one who is out of order!
We’ve only scratched the surface on this subject but I hope I’ve gotten your attention. Everyone should understand this and what the remedies are. Demanding rights and putting hope in the political process are folly and a complete waste of time (on the national level) until you and your sheriff understand the operation of law and whether you are on the PUBLIC SIDE or the Private side.
-Mark Emery
Nothing like a day of naked boating.
They changed it to "Canola" oil cuz who would wanna eat something called Rape Seed?