>>24231175

I think that in order to improve this situation as quickly as possible, need information that shows that there is indeed a problem

However, there will be various individual opinions, and there may also be some brainwashing involved

When people start talking about real solutions, things will get better(I think so)

However, there are some who simply discovered and brought the information

If that's the reason, then there may not be a problem,

but I feel that there are those who will use that information to do something else

For example, the people pushing the Epstein files aren't just long-time supporters of the movement

>>24231202

There are also those who connect things through 'coincidence'

Of course, it cannot be denied that there is no intentional symbolism involved

Isn't this why it is so important to make things clear?

In this world where there are bad people disguised as good people,,,

Isn't this why Q&A sessions are so important?

This anon cannot even understand why foul language comes out just from being asked a question

>>24231204

Constructing 'XYZ' by 'coincidence' is probably not uncommon among anons here anymore

In the past, I thought it was fine for this anon to filter these types of tactics, but as time goes on, I'm trying to get them to answer

I've found that they really hate questions.

Well, I guess it's hard to explain something you don't understand

>>24231206

>fraud is fraud

Yes, that's correct

So, how do approach those who deny these facts or pretend not to see them?

Currently discussing this

In the first place, since there's no way to even have a Q&A session, it feels like it's just propaganda v propaganda(one-explain)

>>24231215

That might work in places where decorate things with numbers,

but I think the form for making things clear here is in place, so I don't think it would work

(Rather, I think that if they have the time to create 'XYZ' from decorative numbers, they should just prove that 'XYZ' is correct)

I've seen people doing that, which is why I'm holding a Q&A

and I'm also looking for more effective questions

>>24231221

Hmm, I don't really know

>>24231228

>>24231171 (me)

>>24231236

Is that a number they're ignoring?

>>24231245

>I just pay attention and observe all the chaos now

Well, if clarify the issue, the confusion will disappear

Or perhaps clear explanations reduce the chances of confusion?

Or is there any benefit to intentionally creating confusion

Explain

This anon knows that people who knew the vaccine was dangerous were able to avoid getting it, but is it possible to verify that the people who knew this reported that it was dangerous?

>>24231239

Do you think Tora3 will never come back?

>>24231253

I think everyone basically has their own opinion/idea

>>24231257

No, just as an example

>>24231269

Because a topic came up that they could handle, right?

>>24231273

Are you talking about open source?

Or something else?

I don't think anything has changed in terms of who licks whose shoes though

>>24231277

I don't think anything has changed in terms of who licks whose shoes though.

>>24231297 edit

Are you talking about open source?

Or something else?

I don't think anything has changed in terms of who licks whose shoes though

>>24231298

>I don't think anything has changed in terms of who licks whose shoes though

By the way, this is about shoes for tap dancing