Guthrie Bitcoin connection, intended or not, could be speculated to have had a projected end goal of blacklisting certain BTC addresses, this destroying the fungibility of the protocol. The current financial system funds the grift. The cannot allow it to be replace or they lose forever.
google selling massive amounts of 100 year bonds for 0.95% above US treasuries.
KEK! Who the fuck is buying that shit???
>Explain like am retarded please
fungibility means that one dollar is the same as another. you have no idea nor does it matter where it came from. if a BTC recipient address is the receiver of ransom money and it can be blacklisted, then any BTC that can be traced to that address is going to have some difficulty being sold or accepted in legalized transactions. it destroys the fungibility of that specific bitcoin and sets a precedent for bitcoin connected to other addresses. It's a long debate in the crypto community. You can block banking accounts, why not Bitcoin? There are good points on both sides. Some kind of solution is probably necessary, but there are forces out there that want to kill Bitcoin altogether…as well as the anti-bitcoin normie idiots that don't understand the benefit of a financial system based on sound money. maybe they get gold, but even that isn't as water tight as bitcoin because even gold has inflation. bitcoin deflates, you get more wealthy over time, not by scamming but simply by owning something that can't be mined or printed. aka, the interest rate is embedded in the fact that it can't be printed…and is exacerbated by bad money. it forces reforms so that the people/institutions with the bad money
start screaming for solutions to their fiat dilution. in the past, they LOVED the fiat scam but not it's been turned around on them…and without the clarity act, yet, and their slow decision making process, the big money can't yet by in. moving to the new world favors the small and courageous.