Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 10:25 p.m. No.24248578   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8585

>>24248561

>It need not be processed as it was at Newcastle, Anon. Coal is available in many forms.

so the PROCESSING is "modern"

not the coal

maybe you could work on unambiguous sentence construction

ps - they were "pelletizing" coal before your granddad was born

Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 10:31 p.m. No.24248593   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8602

>>24248568

>because I should respect my elders? Sorry respect is earned

your elders earned it by living longer than you

if you lose your arrogance, you MIGHT live long enough to understand

>sorry for your bitterness. Unfortunate way to go through life

i'm not bitter

sorry for your lack of perception

unfortunate way to go thru life

Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 10:36 p.m. No.24248606   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8611

>>24248585

>Unlikely

"pelletizing" is really an inappropriate word

it implies that finely ground particles are molded and compressed into pellets, as with your wood "pellets"

coal has been processed thru rock crushing equipment for over a century

the particle size is easily controlled by adjustments to the rock crusher

Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 10:40 p.m. No.24248610   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8614 >>8617

>>24248602

>You talk like a fag

you would know, i guess

>you started the issue by being retarded

check the thread

you were talking like a retard from the get-go

>calling people names

passive-aggressive insults are insults, all the same

they don't make you superior

they just add hypocrisy to you long list of character flaws

Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 11:15 p.m. No.24248682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8687

>>24248666

>We have coal and should use it.

more like absolutely NEED to use it

and return all that sequestered CO2 back to the atmosphere

WHERE IT ORIGINALLY CAME FROM

before photosynthesis collapses completely

 

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/09/28/top-climate-scientist-slams-goebellian-climate-alarm-and-ridiculous-attempts-to-demonise-fertiliser-carbon-dioxide/

Anonymous ID: 6a8cf7 Feb. 11, 2026, 11:34 p.m. No.24248742   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24248722

approx 10,000,000 articles describing scientific research results published annually

the overwhelming bulk are legit

most are too insignificant to matter

and appear ONLY in obscure peer-review journals NEVER seen by the masses

really easy to tell which research reports are compromised

they are discussed on TV