>Maybe the AI is trying not to get suicided
perhaps. Funding $$$ control the narative sameAS msm.
But here we are, YOU & I, haveing a somewhat "intelligent" convo. at the end, best salesman wins, eg YOU convince me, or visa versa, or we agree to dis-agree. Thing is next time you or I conve with a 3rd party, our convo may come into it. eg YOU may think I have a point or 3 & visaVersa, ie as "intelligent" beings we update our dBase, what we know what we don't. Imagine if YOU say being a Protestant, could see zero value in antarticaism as a belief system. but the thought that an alt religion / belief system might exist, would be enough to 'tweak' ya thoughts / replies. Ai just stick with what "knows". so back to my point and Q. who set these rulez in stone, that they may not be challenged and get ignored, all the while the Ai refuses to update self with another possiblity, prev unconsidered.