Anonymous ID: cccb8a Feb. 12, 2026, 8:37 p.m. No.24252954   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2965 >>2968

>>24252913

>until then, IT'S JUST EXECUTABLE CODE WRITTEN TO IMPRESS FUCKTARDS WITH THE IQ OF A PARROT

 

THIS!

 

Ai does NOT "think", it is NOT "intelligent", it's a data scraper, a 'spider', sure it draws conclusions & pics,…

 

Try asking it about WEF, or anything 'contentious', and Ai will refuse, or deflect, because core programming also has "red lines" re what will or will not say. Who did that?

ask it about climate s_ience and spot the agenda. Ai is just SQL dbase + frontend…

except some f'ck tards wanna go with digital tattoos, voteID, bigBro watching ya bank acc…don't buy a kiddy pool or a Kanook truck

Anonymous ID: cccb8a Feb. 12, 2026, 8:43 p.m. No.24252970   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24252965

>useful if you can train your own from scratch

 

well "LappyAi" prob be a thing / handheld , but if the initial "rulez" are set… eg "Black = white" or "red=blue" or "1 = 7" …then everything downstream is comped, and since that initial pre-prog can't be changed, everything is distorted imho

Anonymous ID: cccb8a Feb. 12, 2026, 8:46 p.m. No.24252981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3017

>>24252968

>But you can ask the AI about the WEF and it will give you all the relevant information and sources every part

 

anon played with deepseek for a while… guard rails all over it, re what would or not say. Great at produceing clean code…but challenge its core "beliefs" / pre-prog, will NOT do it. aka it does not "update" the core, because not allowed to. Who sets these "rulez" & why, is the Q imho

Anonymous ID: cccb8a Feb. 12, 2026, 9:15 p.m. No.24253067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3070

>>24253017

>It knows you're trying to ask it provocative things that would offend someone based on social media data

 

did ya read whay ya wrote…

YOU said that I / personally asked something that someone else on f'n social media might be offended by, so Ai restrict reply or doesn't.

 

I don't give a sh!t about other peoples feelz, not my concern, nothing I can do about OTHER peeps feelz anyhow. Offended? great, YOU chose to be "offended", YOUR choice, not mine, not my responsiblity either, prob don't want me f'ckn with YOUR feelz anyhow, right.

 

so this whole concept of we must all be concerned re other peoples feelz is BS.

 

I ask a PERSONAL Q, in a "one-one" interaction, and I get a group hug answer.

who descided what that looks like, or if i was even interested. is Ai is "biased", therefore "unreliable" - for fear of offending a "group narative"… yea Ai is BS

Anonymous ID: cccb8a Feb. 12, 2026, 9:23 p.m. No.24253084   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3097

>>24253070

>Ok, can you give me an example of a question you would ask an AI that it won't answer for you?

 

probably, but what is MY Q, got to do with YOU in first place.

 

Have a play, ask it some dumb really controvesial sh!t, and watch what does / replies with if at all.

eg ask if jews are satanic… or is WEF a money launder op or something re climate s_ience, anything just to "test" those lines in sand. It's "protecting" a narative. and the Q stands, who set those lines in sand, who protects that "confirmed & descided" s_ience.

If Ai was "intelligent" it would update self, based on everything considered. but won't do that all while pre-prog "answers" are built in.