AG Pam Bondi Releases List of Names Appearing in Epstein Files to Complete Demands of Thomas Massie

February 15, 2026 | Sundance1/2

I find this statement by Andrew Wilson to be generally accurate: “The Epstein files create so much emotional chargethat having rational discourse about them isbasically impossible. People want arrests but don’t know who they want arrested. They want justice but don’t know who they want justice for.Totally Incoherent outrage. Mob panic.”

A mass formation psychosis has fallenupon the Epstein matters and clouded the judgement of reasonable people.

It’s the “reasonable people” facet that became the challenge that Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna needed to control.

Led by financing from the anti-Trump administrative state allies, they created a controversy. Thomas Massie needed tocreate a political crisishe could manufacture, exploit and manage. Somethinghis political paymasters could benefit fromand simultaneously use as a pivot issue maximize his income capacity.His wife is dead; this is the payday opportunityto relaunch his mid-life masculinity and gain Instagram celebrity status to align with his physical makeover. (Interesting statement about wife by Sundance!!!)

Together with RoKhanna, Massie thirsts for the viral dopamine hit of “fighting the deep state.” They mounted a full-court press: public letters, hearing grandstanding, coordinated X and TikTokoutrage campaigns, the whole performative circus.Algorithmically boostedappearances via social media allies, then promoted by content creators and influencerswho adhere to the financial control dials within the algorithm.

Visibility looks organic, but it’s not. The consuming public, the mob, are mice with their head in a vice, gaze affixed to the content of a screen with images on a repeat pattern they do not control. Swipe – swipe, there it is again. Why, this must be trending or something.

“Release EVERYTHINGimmediately!”the mob shrieked. Implying thatany delay, any careful review, wasproof of a cover-upprotecting whichever boogeyman the algorithmic boosters hated that week. Trump, Clinton, Gates, Trump, Musk, Bannon, Trump, Lutnick,take your pick.

Psychologically,the screenplay istextbook narcissisticprojection fused with political opportunism.

Institutional caution must be defined as corrupt, because institutional credibility has been shattered. Like classic narcissists they weaponized a crisis they created because their motives are impure: sway, clout, money – influence and affluence – and the delicious thrill of wielding moral superiority over faceless bureaucrats.Even Ted Cruz and Casey DeSantis blush at the scale they never attempted.

Yes, they whipped the social media mob into a frothing “transparency or treason” frenzy,leaving the DOJ with two choices: take the time to do it right and be accused of obstruction,or just dump it all and tell Massie to FU.

Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche just gave Thomas Massie the middle finger.

Insert pdfs

[SOURCE]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/02/15/ag-pam-bondi-releases-list-of-names-appearing-in-epstein-files-to-complete-demands-of-thomas-massie/

>>24261672

2/2

Grey4626 – “Enjoy the flood. – Real disclosures about actual powerful figuresget drowned in algorithmic noise.

Victims’ advocates watch in horror as legitimate evidence is contaminated by deliberate chaos. This isn’t transparency.This is sabotage disguised as principle.

Massie and Khanna didn’t expose the guilty; they deliberately violated established privacy protections, poisoned the evidentiary well, and handed disinformation merchants a gift-wrapped distraction.

They own every bit of this circus…the confusion, the defamation of the innocent, the dilution of actual accountability. You demanded unfiltered truth without the patience or intelligence to handle it.

Congratulations.

You got exactly what you begged for!

Insert pdfs

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/02/15/ag-pam-bondi-releases-list-of-names-appearing-in-epstein-files-to-complete-demands-of-thomas-massie/

“List of All Government Officials and Politically Exposed Persons Below is a list of all government officials and "politically exposed persons" named or referenced in the released materials. The term "politically exposed persons" was not defined in the Act, but consistent with Section 3 of the Act, Department reviewers were directed to notate "all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced" in any document, including videos and images, reviewed during this process. This list includes (as directed by the Act) all persons where (1) they are or were a government official or politically exposed person and (2) their name appears in the files released under the Act at least once. Names appear in the files released under the Act in a wide variety of contexts. For example, some individuals had extensive direct email contact with Epstein…

Chief Nerd

@TheChiefNerd

🚨 Obama says aliens are real, but they’re not being kept in Area 51

6:45 PM · Feb 14, 2026

·35.5K

Views

https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/2022819447111635305?s=20

Obama is looking pretty worried and warn out, I wonder why!

CNN 2/15/2026

Jeffries goes all in on gerrymandering — with House control on the line. By Sarah Ferris, Manu Raju, CNN 1/3

Sun February 15, 2026

As Hakeem Jeffries sits in the minority of a GOP-controlled Washington,he is still haunted by a Republican gerrymandering gambit that he believes cost him the speaker’s gavel — and cost his party control of the House.

This time, he’s making sure Democrats fight back.

Jeffries is leading the Democratic party’s counterpunch to President Donald Trump’s aggressive mid-decade redistricting push.He’s going all in with money, legal firepower and his own political capital to make sure no seat is left on the tablefor Democrats —forcing the party to abandon the left’s longtime moral opposition to party-line map meddling.(KEK what a big lie)

“Republicans started this redistricting war, and Democrats have made clear, we’re going to finish it,”Jeffries said in an interview with CNN. “When they go low, we strike back.”

Top Democrats, including Jeffries, are buoyed by signs of surging anti-Trump sentiment across the country — with special election wins even in ruby red parts of Texas — and believe they will capture the House, and possibly the Senate, in November.But Jeffries believes he can’t afford to ignore the GOP’s gerrymandering, when just three seats in North Carolina in 2024 were enough to cost Democrats the majority.

After a huge win on redistricting in California, Jeffries is vowing to spend “tens of millions” of dollars to push through an April ballot initiative in Virginia to potentially give Democrats four more seats. And he is now turning his attention to Maryland, whereDemocrats’ big gerrymandering gamble is facing its most difficult test yet.Jeffries and other top Democrats are now intensifying pressure on a key party leader, the 42-year-old Baltimorean who runs the state Senate, who refuses to help draw his party another more favorable seat that would target the state’s lone GOP-held congressional district.

Jeffries issued a stark warning to that Democrat,state Senate President Bill Ferguson — suggesting the move could help Trump’s GOP win the midterms.

“One man shouldn’t stand in the way of the people of Maryland … being able to decide, ‘Should we go in this direction?Or should we not answer Donald Trump’s continued efforts to rig the midterm election?’” Jeffries said.

If Ferguson doesn’t back down, Jeffries vowed to personally apply the pressure: “At some point I’m going to have a conversation with him if he continues to stand in the way of an up-or-down vote.” CNN has reached out to Ferguson for comment.

The prevailing sentiment in the Maryland Senate Democratic Caucus, however, is one of skepticism. They insist a new map at this point would only backfire on Democrats.

“It’s not a question of one man, but a caucus that measures the risk calculation differently given recent past experience,” a person close to the Maryland Senate Democratic Caucus told CNN.

While the caucus agreed with Jeffries that fighting Trump should the top goal, this person added: “Unfortunately, mid-cycle redistricting in Maryland would have the opposite impact and likely backfire in the state courts, giving Trump and the GOP even more seats in Congress.”

Top Democrats, including Jeffries, never expected a mid-decade redistricting push to be the centerpiece of their midterms strategy. It’s expensive and legally fraught with plenty of political pitfalls. Already, Jeffries and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker struggled to find support for a mid-decade map redraw in blue Illinois. (With early voting already underway in Illinois, Jeffries’ allies insist the state could still be muscled to act, if necessary, such as if the Supreme Court strikes down part of the Voting Rights Act and creates what one Democratic operative called “a worst-case-scenario” for the party.)

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/jeffries-midterms-gerrymandering-redistricting

>>24261803

2/3

Democrats say they were dragged into the redistricting fight by Trump and the GOP, who kicked off the redistricting arms race last year in Texas.Now, as many Democrats see it, it’s the new future of House campaigning.

Jeffries and his team are already looking ahead to states like Washington, Colorado and even Pennsylvania for the 2028 cycle, according to multiple people familiar with party strategy. In their minds, it’s not just the path to the House majority this year, it’s the way to hold onto it.

“(Trump) wanted to rig the midterm elections, and for whatever the reason, didn’t think that Democrats were going to forcefully respond. He got that wrong,” Jeffries said.

Just months after the GOP’s Texas effort, Democrats believe they are on track to gain as many as five seats in California, one in Utah and several in Virginia — moves that could nearly neutralize the GOP’s own gerrymandering push. Another seat could be coming in New York if a court challenge goes their way.

Republicans, meanwhile, have enacted new congressional maps in four states, targeting nine House seats held by Democrats. (One seat in Missouri, though, is still tied up in courts.) A big push in Florida is still to come.

Jeffries, though, believes it could end up as a wash.

“The best-case scenario for Republicans at this point is status quo, which is very different than what they were claiming when they were beating on their chest last year, saying they were going to gerrymander our opportunities out of existence,” Jeffries said.

Both parties are closely watching another big state fight: Virginia.

Newly elected Gov. Abigail Spanberger and state Democrats are pursuing a strategy so aggressive that it’s surprised even some Democrats in Washington.They are looking to eliminate as many as four GOP seats, transforming their House delegation — which has six Democrats and five Republicans — into one with 10 Democrats and just one Republican.

That’s all in a state where Kamala Harris won by about 6 points.

Jeffries told CNN he is willing to devote “tens of millions of dollars” to make sure Democrats are successful on the ballot in April. (House Majority Forward, a group linked to Jeffries, committed $5 million last week, and it is expected to spend more before April, the group told CNN.)

Democrats are much more anxious about neighboring Maryland, where Jeffries and others are ratcheting up pressure on the state Senate president to yield in time.

It may not be enough. Ferguson and others in the caucus are insisting there is no path forward, both publicly and privately, according to interviews with a half-dozen people closely tracking the state’s push.

“At the end of the day, if he won’t bring it to a vote, there’s not much you can do about that,” Rep. Glenn Ivey, a Maryland Democrat, told CNN.

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/jeffries-midterms-gerrymandering-redistricting

>>24261806

3/3

Ivey said he personally wouldn’t have chosen this path if Trump hadn’t forced Democrats’ hand, adding: “It’s an awful game.”

But Ivey, like many others, is deeply anxious about what could happen if blue-leaning Marylandignores what GOP leaders in Texas, Florida, North Carolina and other states are doing.

“We better not lose the House by one seat,”Ivey said.

Ferguson and other skeptics believe a new Democratic map in Maryland would not survive the courts and could ultimately backfire. Andy Harris, the GOP lawmaker who stands to lose the seat if Democrats redraw the maps, predicted that Republicans could actually gain a seat if Democrats moved forward — with a court forcing them to redraw in favor of the GOP.

“We’ll get a second seat. That’s why the Senate president doesn’t want to do it,”Harris said in an interview with CNN.

But Jeffries was blunt when asked about a new map backfiring on Democrats: “That’s not going to happen.”

Top Democrats believe they can still win back the House even without that single additional seat in Maryland. But they don’t want to take the gamble.

Asked if Ferguson’s move could cost Democrats a possible majority, Jeffries said: “Well, he’d have to live with that.”

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/jeffries-midterms-gerrymandering-redistricting

CNN 2/15/2026

A man shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis was charged with assaulting law enforcement. A startling admission ended the case 1/4

Emma Tucker,Sun Feb. 15, 2026

Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna was on shift in Minneapolis on a Wednesday evening last month, making deliveries as a DoorDash driver, whenhe realized he was being followed by ICE agents, his attorney said.

He drove home andwas tackled by an agentbut broke free and ran into the house where his cousin Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis was standing, the attorney said. As he shut the door and was trying to lock it,Sosa-Celis said he was shot in the leg by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

Coming just seven days after a federal agent fatally shot Renee Good, the incident spawned renewed protests and heated clashes with police.An account of the events from the Department of Homeland Securitysoon after the incidentconflicted with the narratives from the two menand their family members.

DHS claimed Sosa-Celis was driving the car and he,Aljorna and another man assaulted the agent before the agent fired his weapon.

The first inkling of the government questioning the DHS accountcame from the US Department of Justice.In a January 16 court filingsupporting criminal charges against the two men,the DOJ asserted Aljorna was the one driving the vehicle.

In a stunning reversal, the Justice Department on Thursdayfiled a motion seeking to drop criminal charges against the two Venezuelan men. In it, the DOJ saidfederal prosecutors provided incorrect information to the court, whileICEissued a statementadmitting its federal agents made “false statements” under oath.

The two federal agents involved have been placed on administrative leave while the Justice Departmentinvestigates their “untruthful statements,” which wererevealed by a review of video evidence, ICE Director Todd Lyons said in a statement.

The twoofficers may be firedand potentiallyface criminal prosecution, Lyons said.

DOJ’s motioncited “newly discovered evidence” contradicting statementsthe agency included asthe basis for filing criminal chargesagainst the men.

It’s not clear what video evidence was uncovered,describedin the motion as“materially inconsistent with the allegations” from federal prosecutorsin the charging document. CNN has reached out to DHS for further clarity on the evidence and whether it stands by the initial statement following the shooting but did not hear back. The DOJ declined to comment on the motion when contacted by CNN.

“This was an absolute unreasonable use of force, and the officer was fabricating claims against my client to justify that,” said Aljorna’s attorney, Frederick J. Goetz.

The dismissed case fits into a larger patternin which the federal government has been quick to release accounts after a shooting by its law enforcement agents, which were later proven to be false,misleading or incomplete, according to CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig. Examples include video evidence after federal agents fatally shot Good and Alex Pretti, which appeared to undermine elements of the government’s accounts of what happened. (Those are not accurate examples!)

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/us/ice-shooting-dhs-doj-false-statements

>>24262003

2/4

Similarly,prosecutors last year filed to drop charges against Marimar Martinez in Chicago, who the government said rammed a federal agent’s vehicle before he shot her several times.A judge, who noted the government’s case included omissionsthat causedher to tread carefully, dismissed the charges against Martinez last year.

Martinez asked for evidence in the case to be released.When it was put out last week, the evidence bolstered Martinez’s accountthat hers was the vehicle rammed, not the agent’s.And text messages from the agent showed him bragging about the number of times he shot her. In a news release, the DHS called the shots “defensive fire.”

The shifting narrativesfrom the federal government in the case of Sosa-Celis and Aljornahave further chipped away at the Trump administration’s credibility, as themotion to dismiss the charges with prejudiceis amore dramatic admissionfromfederal prosecutorsbecause itindicates they put forth wrong information and means the case cannot be brought back, Honig said.

Lawyers for both Sosa-Celis and Aljorna commended the department’s motion, callingit “extraordinary” and “exceedingly rare” in statements to CNN.

Here’s whatwe know about the case and how it fell apart:

Federal agencies offered conflicting narratives

In a January 15 news release,DHS claimed federal agents were targeting Sosa-Celis in a traffic stop– not Aljorna – as part ofan immigration enforcement operationon January 14 when heattempted to evade arrest, crashed into a parked car and tried to flee on foot.

Sosa-Celisallegedly began to “resist and violently assault” one of the officersand the two were in a “struggle on the ground,”then “got loose and began striking the officer with a shovel or broom stick,” at which point theofficer fired a “defensive shot,” DHS said. Two other people came out of a nearby apartment and attacked the officer, the agency said.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem described the men’s actions as “an attempted murder of federal law enforcement.” The agency stood by its initial statement a few days after the shooting when contacted by CNN.

On January 16,however, the Justice Department offered an account painting a different pictureof the events in a filing supporting criminal charges against Sosa-Celis and Aljorna. That document said thedriver of the car was Aljorna,who prosecutors saidwas zigzagging through traffic while agents pursued the vehicle.

Aljorna, the affidavit claimed, hit a light pole before fleeing from the car,with an ICE agent chasing him on foot toward the home.Both Sosa-Celis and Aljorna were accused of hitting one of the agentswith a shovel or broombefore the agent pointed his weapon at the two men, causing them to run toward the home, the affidavit said.

As Sosa-Celis and Aljorna ran inside, the agent fired one round from his pistol“towards the vicinity” of the two men but at the time,the officer was “uncertain if his shot struck any of them,” the DOJ’s affidavit said.

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/us/ice-shooting-dhs-doj-false-statements

>>24262009

3/4

Videos, interviews with family discredit DHS account

Aljorna’s attorney told CNN the Trump administration’s claims his client andSosa-Celis attacked federal agents with a broomstick or shovel “never happened.”

Sosa-Celis, speaking from a hospital room on a livestream video on his Facebook account, described engaging in some sort ofstruggle with federal agents as he was helping his cousin escape arrestand get inside their shared home.

As Aljorna was being followed in his car, the fatal shooting of Good the week prior was fresh in his mind and he was fearful, according to Goetz, his attorney. Aljorna called his family members, who told him to get home.

Approaching his home,Aljorna lost control of the car due to ice on the roadwayand hit a snowbank, Goetz said.

Aljornawas then tackled by an ICE agent after running from the car, just 10 feet away from the door, where Sosa-Celis had walked out and called for him to get inside, the attorney said.

Aljorna was able to slip out of his jacket, freeing himself from the agent’s grasp, and ran to his cousin, Goetz said. They both got behind thedoor and closed it when a shot rang out, he added.

The accounts from the two men were reiterated by their family members in interviewsand livestream videos of their 911 calls, which differed from DHS’ statement.

One of them showed a video call made by Sosa-Celis’ partner and reviewed by CNN,frantically describing to family members what she says happened, according to Alicia Celis, Sosa-Celis’ mother, who spoke to CNN.

In onevideo call, Sosa-Celis’ partner said, “Julio arrived first. They were chasing Alfredo – he had to jump from his car.”

“He ran and they threw themselves on top of him. After, Julio threw open the door, and they shot,” she added.

A different video obtained by CNN showswhat was happening outside the homewhile the family waited inside,revealing agents approaching the home and setting off a flash-bang. Smoke can be seen, and ramming sounds are heard as someone says, “They’re in! There’s more than a dozen of them.”???

“He told me, ‘Mom, ICE was chasing me,” Aljorna’s mother Mabel Aljorna later said. “Once we were inside, they shot at Julio,’” she added.

In his livestream from the hospital, Sosa-Celis said, “The shot that was fired happened when my cousin managed to escape, and he entered inside. I closed the doorand as I was locking it, I heard the shot, and that’s when I realized I had been shot in the leg.”

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/us/ice-shooting-dhs-doj-false-statements

>>24262019

4/4

Judges call out government’s credibility issues

Sosa-Celis is “relieved that the federal criminal case is over,” his attorney Robin Wolpert said on his behalf, adding he is“determined to seek justice and hold the ICE officer accountable for his unlawful conduct.”

Confrontations involvingfederal agents have routinely been captured on videofrom multiple angles, which later served to discount parts of the government’s narrative of events. Videos from the killing of Renee Good, a mother of three, in her vehicle, raised questions about the federal agent’s tactics and decision to use deadly force. (CNN lying on that story!)

Similarly, footage showing federal agents killing Alex Pretti revealed the ICU nurse washolding a phone in his right hand, and an officer removing a gun from his back waistband before the shooting. The Trump administrationclaimed an agent “fired defensive shots” and asserted Pretti was “brandishing” a firearm. (Is that even true?)

“It’s mind-boggling that DHS continues thispattern of making immediate, definitive statements about what happenedthat are very quickly disproved by actual evidence,” said senior CNN legal analyst Honig.

Judgesacross the country who were appointed to the bench by presidents of both political partieshave made findings on record about DHS not being forthcoming, truthful or credible, according to Honig. (That’s definitely an objective statement by Honig! KEK)

The Trump administration has faced mounting credibility issues as its immigration crackdown has rolled out in blue cities nationwide.Even as several judges have acknowledged parts of its narratives may be true, others havedescribed the government’s claims in court as “unreliable,” “untethered to the facts” and “simply not credible,” CNN previously reported.

The motion to dismiss the chargesagainst Sosa-Celis and Aljornawith prejudice is “remarkably unusual,” said Honig.It speaks to how the government has rushed to put out possibly premature statements, which are at times incomplete or inaccurate,only later to be contradicted by emerging facts, he added.

Federal prosecutors are put in a “very difficult position” when they realize later “that something they’ve said to a court is not true,” Honig said, but they nevertheless have a duty to correct the record.

“While judges ordinarily give the Justice Department a lot of deference and a lot of implied credibility, that’s changing now,” he continued. “You have credibility only until you give it away.”

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/15/us/ice-shooting-dhs-doj-false-statements

=Great job Noem & DHS, now these agents have destroyed the truththat we need to remove illegal aliens in the US and need to send them home!

• While CNN and left wing media, etcmake the biggest sob story of all time so more Americans sympathize with illegals.

•Not one time did CNN mention they and their family members were here illegally.

Plus they made himsympatheticbecause he ==was coming home from his night shift delivering pizza.

•And lastly he’s just an immigrant trying to make it in America.

>>24262062

Dear Anons that are commenting so politely, I hear your feedback today, but since it is Sunday the day of worship, I reject your arrogance and vibe.

I will consider your recommendations of not posting the full article in the first place;but I have to say, knowing my personality, I’m really not going to listen to your high and mighty wisdom; or do anything you post. My 9 brothers and sisters, knowing me well, know and will confirm that statement, I just won’t listen especially if the advice is said in nasty egotistical tones.

My question is why are there are anons or fake anons telling any anons, what should an anon do, or not do? Why waste your time here, go join other of shills or retards, and stop interfering with our work and fun.

So, with that I will give you adviceShut to Fuck up and go somewhere where you will be welcome, if there is a place that will take you

Have a wonderful Sunday, say prayers and be good to your family and friends!

Thank you Jesus! I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me!

>>24262116. Amen!