Look … doesn't that woman standing up in the picture remind you of the woman sitting behind Strozk in the committee hearing touching her glasses.
Maybe nothing … but those two women look about the same age and facial structure.
Look … doesn't that woman standing up in the picture remind you of the woman sitting behind Strozk in the committee hearing touching her glasses.
Maybe nothing … but those two women look about the same age and facial structure.
>Anonymous 08/03/18 (Fri) 03:21:33 9e4c7e (4) No.2426755>>2426788
>So did Strzok activate Kate with the coke bottle? Camera panned to ensure name on bottle was seen (Kate). Kate's plan went into action. OK guy gets her in the paper to deliver attack confirmation and "VIP" access. USSS can already read those comms and thwarts attack?
She's suspect. And not sure what her role was if she was involved. Since she wasn't VIP, she prolly wasn't checked anymore thoroughly then anyone else.
In this case she could have brought someone in with her that would assist or cause harm.
Her story doesn;t add up yet
yep
We need more info on her Anon. Then we will call police and let them do their job. We are not a vigilante group here.
Sorry her tweets give her away. No one would kill her at a Trump rally anyway. Why waste a bullett on her when a President would be the ultimate prize. Think
Besides we are still working the Wilke's and media angle on this .It has promise. Especially if Rally Anon is right in saying more media covering it then ever before. I notice more YT feeds this time too. One was bad, fuzzy and out of focus cutting in and out alot. The other two were better. One was especially crystal clear of the two.
Who was streaming those feeds. Did they get extra money so they could. Was one streaming that never has covered a rally before or only one or two. Are they all regulars.
See all the things you need to start looking at to make sure you get down to the right answer .
Kate is suspicious for me … still