>>2427157

This is def fishy AF to me. Seeing it for first time after long day workfagging.

Agree with anon that said it sounded scripted.

I immediately heard the interview as a warning to anons. "He found me on the CBTS on 4chan, then he reverse image searched my picture, found me on Twitter, somehow found all my information, and then drove 22 hours uninvited to my home. I didn't know what I was dealing with but I thought I could be in danger, he drove 22 hours straight to get to me unannounced…"

That def sounded to me like a "BTFO or you will be next" warning to anons.

>>2427477

Yep, another fishy part. And true anons know that too. So maybe not necessarily a warning to anons… a warning to potential newcomers to "stay away from the chans lest you be doxxed and hunted down by a crazy from Oklahoma!"

Kind of like when CNN tried to tell use that we would get in trouble for reading the Podesta e-mails on Wikileaks. "Only us media types are allowed to read them! But don't worry, we'll tell you what's in them."

>>2427746

Maybe anons are not meant to have a clue, but the right people understood the comms 5:5.