SEC_TEST
>so dangerous
>have been
Be specific.
What is actually done.
Does it make sense?
Are POISONS involved?
Are ANTIBIOTICS involved?
Are there controls?
Are MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS involved?
Would the same retarded method confirm that firefighters are responsible for fires because you made a snapshop right when the fire burned?
Did anyone actually confirm that these particles actually cause dis-ease?
And only those, not the monkey kidney cells, the antibiotics and all the other shit?
Are there controls?
Can I just get the mucus of one patient and just use these to grow more and more viruses?
If not, then can I get the mucus of 10 patients and just use these to grow more and more viruses and make people sick?
If not, then can I get the mucus of 1000 patients and just use these to grow more and more viruses and make people sick?
If the edjucated answer is:
>there are not enough viruses, it doesn't work
then maybe you should start thinking.
"Virologists" tell you exactly that and defend their retarded poison voodoo method, that makes zero sense.
Also no controls.
>scientifically
that would mean CONTROLS (not done) and also actual ISOLATION, not mixing and adding shit, then claiming that something in their mind killed cells, right after you added all sorts of poisons, that would have killed the cells by themselves (spoiler)
Are there papers that accidentally did controls?
What did they find?
Why does your science fiction ignore that?
Are you a lying piece of shit?
great scientific arguments there, retard
>but my professor told me, it must be truth
go back to reddit
your science is your religion