>Their sir names all have something in common
you're joking, right?
you're NOT joking?
you actually believe that's the way to write SURNAMES?
smfh…
Lord help us
>Their sir names all have something in common
you're joking, right?
you're NOT joking?
you actually believe that's the way to write SURNAMES?
smfh…
Lord help us
>A virus is a one celled organism, bacteria, and fungi combined
retarded technobabble jargonspeak gibberish
you do INCALCULABLE DAMAGE when you post shit like this
you DISCREDIT the real researchers trying to put an end to the big pharma/AMA/FDA/insurance complex
pls KILL YOURSELF
>are viruses real? have they actually been observed under a microscope?
YES! and YES!
see
>Viruses have been imaged using scanning electron microscopes
they have also been observed with the pioneering light microscopes of Béchamp, Rife, and Naessens
>If the edjucated answer is
>>there are not enough viruses, it doesn't work
>then maybe you should start thinking.
cool story, bro…
except, that's NOT the educated answer
that's only YOUR DELUSIONAL BELIEF SYSTEM
>Viruses are DNA in a protein wrapper. Retroviruses are RNA in a protein wrapper.
>They require a host cell they can hijack to read their contents, which forces ribosomes within the host cell to make more viruses.
>They are not alive in and of themselves.
what you wrote is NOT WRONG
however, at the risk of triggering our scientifically illiterate fren…
it MAY not be a COMPLETE understanding
i refer you to this the attached reprint
it was one of the forwords to "the trial and persecution of gaston naessens"by christopher bird
naessens independently duplicated the work of raymond royal rife, decades earlier
and rife independently corroberated the findings of antoine bechamp, decades before him
you would do well to look into these matters
butt out, niggertard
if you had BOTHERED to actually READ the pdf file i posted
you MIGHT have discovered that it contained some actual discoveries that have been rigorously suppressed
BCS they challenge the biomedical status quo
but you're to busy ranting like a petulant child
who has convinced himself that because ONE scientist was a corrupt lying tool of the deepstate
that implies ALL scientists are corrupt lying tools of the deepstate
i really feel sorry for you, CHILD
btw, i don't merely believe what my professors told me
i became a professor, fucked around, and found out for myself
and i have a list of highly cited publications to back it up
and THAT is how REAL science works, CHILD
not by posting psychotic rants on anonymous message boards