Core Conspiracy Claims on Why Mainstream "Antagonists" Deny Benefits
of blocking blue light.
Population Control via Circadian Disruption and Pineal Suppression: Theorists like neurosurgeon Dr. Jack Kruse (a prominent figure in biohacking conspiracies) claim blue light in screens isn't accidental—it's engineered from 1950s experiments at Tulane University, influenced by Operation Paperclip scientists (Nazi recruits post-WWII) and CIA-funded MKUltra mind control programs. They allege early tests (e.g., José Delgado's brain implants on animals) showed blue-rich light could manipulate behavior by suppressing melatonin, disrupting sleep, and "calcifying" the pineal gland (seen as the "third eye" for spiritual awareness). Casinos in Las Vegas reportedly pioneered windowless, blue-lit environments to make gamblers lose track of time and spend more—data the CIA allegedly used to "scale it up" via TVs and devices. Mainstream denial (e.g., AAO saying no evidence of harm) is supposedly to keep people exposed, fostering a docile, unhealthy, "asleep" populace that's easier to control. Blocking blue light would empower individuals by restoring natural rhythms, so it's downplayed as "pseudoscience."
Big Tech and Pharma Profits from Chronic Illness: In these theories, tech giants (Google, Apple, Meta) patent blue-heavy LED tech knowing it causes fatigue, obesity, depression, and metabolic issues via melatonin/cortisol imbalance—but they profit from addicted users. Pharma benefits from treating resulting conditions (insomnia meds, antidepressants). Denials from organizations like the AAO or Cochrane are claimed to be influenced by industry funding or lobbying, echoing how tobacco science once dismissed smoking risks. If blocking (e.g., via glasses or filters) was widely endorsed, it could reduce screen addiction and health issues, cutting profits. Theorists point to studies showing blue blockers boost melatonin by 50–70% and improve sleep, but claim these are buried while debunkings are amplified.
Suppression of Spiritual/Health Awakening: Echoing the initial pineal theories, blue light is seen as a "frequency weapon" to block DMT production, higher consciousness, or "decalcification" (via fluoride synergy). Antagonists deny blocking benefits to prevent mass "awakening"—people feeling more alert, spiritual, or resistant to control. Full-body exposure (not just eyes, but skin absorbing light) is emphasized, so glasses alone are insufficient; mainstream focuses on "no eye damage" to distract from systemic effects like mitochondrial dysfunction or hormone disruption.
Overstated "No Evidence" as Gaslighting: Theorists argue mainstream claims (e.g., "no high-quality evidence") ignore animal/cell studies showing blue light causes retinal oxidative stress, ROS buildup, or macular degeneration risks, while human trials are underfunded or biased. They cite benefits like 1–2 hour faster melatonin onset with blockers, but say antagonists cherry-pick weak studies to call it "bogus" or a "scam" for marketing control.
SO ARE BLUE LIGHT BLOCKER GLASSES THE NEW TIN - FOIL HAT?