Anonymous ID: b6fbad Feb. 20, 2026, 10:31 a.m. No.24283659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3670 >>3679 >>3713

Alternative paths for TRUMP TARIFFS

 

Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Allows tariffs or restrictions on imports threatening national security. No cap on rates or duration; requires a Commerce Department investigation and findings. Trump used this extensively in both terms (e.g., steel/aluminum, autos, copper, lumber, furniture). Many existing Section 232 tariffs remain unaffected by the ruling, and new/expanded investigations (e.g., on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals) could add more.

 

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Permits tariffs in response to unfair trade practices, violations of trade agreements, or discriminatory actions by other countries. Handled by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) after investigation. No rate limit; Trump used it heavily against China in his first term and could launch new probes to target partners.

 

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974: Authorizes temporary worldwide tariffs (up to 15%) or quotas to address large balance-of-payments deficits or international payments problems. Quick to implement with minimal process; limited to 150 days unless Congress extends. Often cited as a fast "replacement" for broad IEEPA tariffs, though at a lower rate cap.

 

Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930: An older, rarely used provision allowing up to 50% duties on imports from countries discriminating against U.S. commerce. Could target specific discriminatory practices.

 

Other/niche authorities: Additional targeted actions under laws like the Trade Act of 1974 or negotiated rulemaking, plus potential congressional legislation for broader authorization (though unlikely given political dynamics).

 

https://x.com/i/grok/share/1e7bd37855ea4124874c0d1594434b9b