Anonymous ID: 200cc1 Aug. 3, 2018, 5:14 a.m. No.2429169   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Waking up to find anons fully slid into the mud pool over one woman instead of trusting the plan.

smh

 

Unless something tangible comes up during the first cup of coffee, it's gonna be a day without Q.

Anonymous ID: 200cc1 Aug. 3, 2018, 5:26 a.m. No.2429250   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Voter Integrity matters.

 

Here's an article from October 2017 of the count at that time. 15 states were refusing to comply with the election commission.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-states-responded-trump-election-commission-request-release-voter-data-2017-10

 

I suspect (will not assert full knowledge) that there is room in the U.S. Election laws to mandate voter id for the election to which the candidate represents.

Courts have been firm that voting is a states right issue, but I believe there is a chance that a law affecting a national candidate - and there's really only one - will allow for ID for that particular election.

 

Would mean two ballots, one for the national, one for the state (Senate and House reps would be state), but I see a small window where it might happen.

Anonymous ID: 200cc1 Aug. 3, 2018, 5:29 a.m. No.2429266   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Will also say that the reason WI turned Red for Trump was voter ID. It was new for his election.

 

Worked my ass off to make that one happen. More ass-numbing hearings than I care to remember.

Oh, and it was mainly the WOMEN who finally strong-armed the legislature into making it happen.

Governor was surprisingly weak on the subject, but happy to take credit when it was all over.

And yes, it took a year to get through the courts to affirm. But the timing was right, and it stuck around here.

 

You are welcome. ;)

Anonymous ID: 200cc1 Aug. 3, 2018, 5:36 a.m. No.2429301   🗄️.is 🔗kun

BTW, Trump dissolved the Election Commission in January 2018, even though the press makesit sound like it just happened.

 

https://www.npr.org/2018/01/03/575524512/trump-dissolves-controversial-election-commission