Threat 1 = man driving to make an attempt on POTUS.

Threat 2 = Not fully known (by us), USSS thwarted the threat. This included Q sign confiscation at the rally.(This implies that Threat2 had some basis in using Q supporters for some action(s))

If Threat1=Threat2

1)to prevent one is to prevent the other, meaning the ostensible Threat1 thwarting was not what it seemed, since Threat2 was still a go?

2)We know for sure that USSS stopped Threat2 (USSS threat IDEN action taken).

It would seem the answer to the question, “Threat to POTUS thwarted?” (as it relates to VIP access) is no. The threat neutralization took place at the rally by USSS. This can lead to the question: “Why fake a threat prevention in the case of Threat1?” What message does this send?