another take on the last 2 q crumbs
>Incorrect decoding.
>Not the person.
The kate person is irrelevant.
>Think connection.
>Threat 1
>Threat 2
There is a connection between both threats. Both of them had to do with the rallies.
>1 = past (newspaper)
>2 = future (rally)
>1=2
Both threats are the same. Taking potus out in a rally
>Post noted (VIP access).
The blackhats nored the post about the thwarted attack before prev rally. The attacker probably had vip access.
>Message sent.
>We know.
The q crumbabout the vip access was a message to the balckhats meaning that USSS knows about their plan to execute the same thing in this rally.
>Q
>Autists present?
>No connection?
>Logical thinking.
Need simple logical thinking to connect Q "vip access" drop, and the assasination attempt at yesterdays' rally.
>Re: VIP access.
>Subject: Threat to POTUS thwarted?
The subject of the "vip access" crumb was not kate but the threat to assasinate potus at a rally.
>Rally: USSS threat IDEN > action taken.
At yesterdays' rally the threat was detected and removed.
>Comms dark.
>Message sent.
After the "vip access" crumb, q went quiet. This was a message delivered to blackhats that they know of their plan to plant an assasin in the vip list.
>5:5?
Is it 5:5 q? Am i on the right track woth this decode?
>Q