Anonymous ID: def724 Aug. 3, 2018, 4:17 a.m. No.2428761   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8774 >>8784 >>8785 >>9011 >>9087 >>9141 >>9179 >>9236 >>9267 >>9289 >>9308 >>9330 >>9362 >>9370 >>9375 >>9411 >>9441

another take on the last 2 q crumbs

 

>>2426184

 

>Incorrect decoding.

>Not the person.

 

The kate person is irrelevant.

 

>Think connection.

>Threat 1

>Threat 2

 

There is a connection between both threats. Both of them had to do with the rallies.

 

>1 = past (newspaper)

>2 = future (rally)

>1=2

 

Both threats are the same. Taking potus out in a rally

 

>Post noted (VIP access).

 

The blackhats nored the post about the thwarted attack before prev rally. The attacker probably had vip access.

 

>Message sent.

>We know.

 

The q crumbabout the vip access was a message to the balckhats meaning that USSS knows about their plan to execute the same thing in this rally.

 

>Q

 

>>2425988

 

>Autists present?

>No connection?

>Logical thinking.

 

Need simple logical thinking to connect Q "vip access" drop, and the assasination attempt at yesterdays' rally.

 

>Re: VIP access.

>Subject: Threat to POTUS thwarted?

 

The subject of the "vip access" crumb was not kate but the threat to assasinate potus at a rally.

 

>Rally: USSS threat IDEN > action taken.

 

At yesterdays' rally the threat was detected and removed.

 

>Comms dark.

>Message sent.

 

After the "vip access" crumb, q went quiet. This was a message delivered to blackhats that they know of their plan to plant an assasin in the vip list.

 

>5:5?

 

Is it 5:5 q? Am i on the right track woth this decode?

 

>Q