Anonymous ID: 4fceb5 Aug. 3, 2018, 6:05 a.m. No.2429486   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9604 >>9614 >>9647 >>9672 >>9681 >>9703 >>9779 >>9826 >>0038 >>0065 >>0075 >>0104 >>0150 >>0188

Question for oldfags on board culture

Been here since February, but have been digging on "power elite analysis" for over ten years.

Dozens of notables since February. I like to dig.

Last few breads I witnessed a major deviation from chan culture and comms that I have learned since feb.

 

  1. Femanon posts selfie - No tits or gtfo.

  2. Femanon appears to be complete famefag - accepted.

  3. Femanon becomes notable with very little sauce.

  4. Board slides for at leas three breads because of it.

  5. Crumbs misinterpreted because of it.

 

I dig and only comment on culture when I see a divisionfag or a concernfag shilling.

 

It appears to me, thought that our culture works in preventing this type of slide. It prevents identity politics and bias.

 

Here's the questions:

 

Was this instance of namefagging, famefagging acceptable and why did oldfags not put a stop to it when it sprouted?

 

Here's another one:

 

Should we be more careful in allowing namefagging to occur at these rallies

 

Serious question. Thank you. WWG1WGA.

Anonymous ID: 4fceb5 Aug. 3, 2018, 6:16 a.m. No.2429557   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2429530

This explains why shills come in waves.

It seems like there is always a shill topic of the moment.

They coalesce around it and push it hard.

After a while they change topics and pursue identical tactics of shitting the bread and responding to each other.

TY Anon