Anonymous ID: afebe0 Aug. 3, 2018, 7:07 a.m. No.2430043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0072

Spreadsheet is updated to post >>2426184

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g/edit?usp=sharing

 

Full-sized images Q posts/responds to updated:

https://postimg.cc/gallery/29wdmgyze/

 

(nested) Screenshots (in EST) updated:

Aug '18: https://postimg.cc/gallery/2rc5iqf5m/

 

THANK YOU USSS

o7

Anonymous ID: afebe0 Aug. 3, 2018, 7:19 a.m. No.2430188   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2429486

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "FEMANON"

That's the point of anon.

Once "I'm a femanon" is mentioned, they are no longer anon! SOP applies and engages for a reason.

Fuck these stupid attention-whoring sluts and the dumb, desperate faggots who welcome them.

Sick to death of interlopers attempting to shame chan culture and change it. Even sicker of those who acquiesce. So thank you for this - you are right - culture is created to prevent this bullshit.

  1. NO, it was not. fame/tripfagging became used post Q. For some it was famefagging, for a few it was utilitarian ONLY. There were arguments once the famefagging/clique bs started. A smart BO stopped all tripcodes except Q.

Like idiot thots, namefagging should (and used to be) be ridiculed and hounded to tears and shunned.

  1. Obviously