Anonymous ID: a811cf Aug. 3, 2018, 8:39 a.m. No.2431172   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1352 >>1363 >>1416 >>1475 >>1494 >>1624 >>1634

>>2426184

>>>2425988

 

>Incorrect decoding.

anons got this wrong so far

 

>Not the person.

don't focus on Kate or the OK guy

 

>Think connection.

back up the telephoto lens and see the big picture, the connection Q's trying to show us

 

>Threat 1

Find the connection between a past newspaper article, which is Threat #1. . .

 

>Threat 2

. . . and a future rally → perhaps the "future" rally was last night in PA, perhaps it has yet to take place (?)

 

>1 = past (newspaper)

roger that.

 

>2 = future (rally)

roger that.

 

>1=2

The past newspaper threat = the future rally threat; they are perfectly connected.

 

>Post noted (VIP access).

Q's prior post noted "VIP access" → so, someone who was/who did receive VIP access (could that be the Press? or are we talking @ a non-Press person who was invited to an area reserved for "VIPs" (if there even is such an area at the rallies)

 

>Message sent.

Regardless of whether we figure it out, Q has let (((them))) know that Q team knows. But why tip them off like this, why not nab the f'er and prosecute? Maybe the threat was not to injure POTUS, but rather, to [kill] the Q movement or malign Trump supporters?

 

>We know.

Why let (((them))) know we know what they're up to? Why????

 

>Q

Anonymous ID: a811cf Aug. 3, 2018, 8:59 a.m. No.2431494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2431172

>>Message sent.

 

>Regardless of whether we figure it out, Q has let (((them))) know that Q team knows. But why tip them off like this, why not nab the f'er and prosecute? Maybe the threat was not to injure POTUS, but rather, to [kill] the Q movement or malign Trump supporters?

____

 

Fake MSM came out of the woodwork, en masse, reporting/trashing the Q movement. Trump mentioned the tremendous media presence at the PA rally yesterday. Apparently, "Q swag" was not allowed in to the rally.

 

It would make sense that (((they))) would/will be trying to [kill/discredit] Q and that (((they))) would do so, publicly, right in front of POTUS himself, with all the cameras rolling. Probably tried it last night. Probably will try it again.

Anonymous ID: a811cf Aug. 3, 2018, 9:19 a.m. No.2431770   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2423601

didn't Cathy O'Brien say that @ the same age, she had been targeted for death in a snuff film? She explained why --aging sex toy for one, but also smthg about the MK programming not being as effective as one gets older?

>>2423601 (PB)

didn't Cathy O'Brien say that @ the same age, she had been targeted for death in a snuff film? She explained why --aging sex toy for one, but also smthg about the MK programming not being as effective as one gets older?