Notable
>>2430708 (pb Q)
>Full attack mode.
>Washington Post leading?
>Who owns the Washington Post?
>Amazon?
>What ABC agency is heavily tied to Amazon?
With JB being tied to closely to this ABC agency, it's not that much of a stretch to think that JB is "in the know" WRT to Q. The logical implication being: if he knows Q is legit, why does he let his paper cover it in such an adversarial/dismissive way? I'm not saying he should tell his staff Q is real, just give guidance that they should cover the phenomenon from a neutral stance. Which should be default for reporters right?
NOTABLE