>Then try and edit it to add some facts…..see if you are able…you have NOT done the research.
>Obviously.
i HAVE edited pages… SUCCESSFULLY
but then again i edit scientific content, not bullshit content
i merely objected to the blanket statement that implied EVERYTHING on wikipedia is false
IT IS NOT
that is NOT to say there is no fuckery
but it's mainly restricted to highly politicized content
>Try referencing Wikipedia in any academic work and see where that gets you
my students are warned to NEVER cite wikipedia as an ultimate reference
on the other hand, i tell them it's ok to use as one method of tracking down ORIGINAL sources
NATO nations plotting to smuggle nuke into Ukraine – Russian intel
The UK and France are also considering a radioactive “dirty bomb” as an option for Kiev, the SVR has claimed.
France and the UK are plotting to secretly arm Ukraine with a nuclear weapon, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) said on Tuesday.
According to the agency, British and French officials are considering the “covert transfer of relevant European-made components, equipment, and technologies to Ukraine,” and are laying the groundwork for an information campaign that would misrepresent the nuclear capacity as domestically developed.
The SVR claimed that another option under consideration is to provide Ukraine with a French TN 75 warhead, used in the nation’s submarine-launched ballistic missiles. It added that Ukraine could also be encouraged to build a ‘dirty bomb’ – a conventional explosive device laden with radioactive materials designed to cause prolonged contamination of a territory.
“Kiev would be able to aspire to more advantageous terms of ceasing the hostilities if it possesses a nuclear or at least a so-called ‘dirty’ bomb,” the SVR said in a statement. It added that fellow NATO member Germany “has prudently refused to take part in this dangerous venture.”
Officials in London and Paris appear to be losing “touch with reality,” the agency said, warning that responsibility for such a reckless operation would fall on them.
The Russian State Duma intends to vote on a formal resolution calling on lawmakers in the UK and France to investigate the SVR allegations, Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin said. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the warning was “potentially very dangerous” since the alleged plot poses a threat to nuclear non-proliferation.
Ukraine has long claimed that it gave up a nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees that later proved worthless. While a significant portion of Soviet nuclear forces were stationed in Ukraine, Kiev never controlled the missiles.
The 1994 Budapest Memorandums provided assurances – but not legally binding guarantees – to Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan that their territorial integrity would be respected after transferring Soviet nuclear weapons to Russia. Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky suggested Kiev could reconsider its non-nuclear status at the 2022 Munich Security Conference, shortly before the conflict with Russia escalated.
Moscow argues that after the 2014 Western-backed coup in Kiev, Ukraine’s new authorities breached the neutrality pledge underpinning its post-Soviet independence by making NATO membership a key foreign policy goal.
https://www.rt.com/russia/632954-nato-nations-could-transfer-nuclear-weapon-to-kiev/
>>24309623 (me)
huh… last week kim.com posted a similar story, and all the gatekeepers and listkarens ridiculed his post… just sayin'…
British, French embassies make cliched statements about nukes for Kiev
MOSCOW, February 25. /TASS/. The statements issued by the French and British embassies denying plans to arm Ukraine with nuclear weapons appear to be nothing more than rehearsed cliches, lacking depth or credibility, according to Federation Council Deputy Speaker Konstantin Kosachev.
Earlier, media reports citing these embassies indicated that Paris and London had dismissed any intentions to supply Ukraine with nuclear arms. Kosachev criticized these responses, stating, "So far, we have seen no responsible, serious, or official high-level reaction. The comments from the relevant press services - particularly, in France, not even from the government ministries but solely from the embassy here in Moscow - are simply pre-cooked cliches that add no real value. They deny the findings of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service." He further pointed out that these statements fail to confirm that the involved countries are adhering to their obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Potential transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine
Russia’s intelligence service (SVR) has uncovered active efforts by London and Paris to facilitate such a transfer, including the covert movement of European equipment, components, and technology to Ukraine. Notably, the French TN75 warhead, derived from the M51.1 submarine-launched ballistic missile, is under consideration as part of this scheme. He also emphasized that Berlin has wisely chosen to abstain from participating in this dangerous venture.
In response to these allegations, Russian legislators have called on members of the British and French parliaments to thoroughly investigate these plans at both the international and national levels.
The Federation Council has proposed that the UN Security Council, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the Review Conference of the Parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty conduct investigations into these alleged intentions, in accordance with their mandates. Russian officials warn that pursuing such plans would significantly escalate the conflict and pose a direct threat to the security of Russia and the broader European region.
https://tass.com/politics/2091529
Russia will respond if Estonia hosts NATO nukes – Kremlin
Moscow is not threatening the Baltic state, but will aim its nuclear weapons at it if NATO nukes are deployed there, Dmitry Peskov has said
Russia will aim its nuclear weapons at Estonia if NATO nukes are deployed there, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said, after the Baltic nation’s foreign minister stated that Tallinn would not be opposed to hosting nuclear weapons.
European members of the US-led bloc have discussed expanding their nuclear deterrence as part of a massive military buildup, which has been justified by what Western officials describe as the ‘Russian threat’ – a claim that Moscow has dismissed as “nonsense.”
“We do not threaten Estonia, or any other European country,” Peskov told journalist Pavel Zarubin on Sunday. “But if nuclear weapons are deployed on Estonian territory and are aimed at [Russia], then our nuclear weapons will be aimed at Estonian territory,” he warned, adding that Tallinn “should have a solid understanding of it.”
Earlier this week, Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said Estonia is not against the idea of hosting NATO nuclear weapons, adding that the country will be ready if the bloc decides to deploy them there.
Estonia has been one of Ukraine’s top supporters and has pushed for increased defense spending in Europe, citing the supposed threat of a Russian attack. Last year, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called Estonia “one of the most hostile countries,” and accused it of “spreading myths and falsehoods” about Russia.
Estonia is not the first European NATO member to express a desire to acquire nuclear weapons one way or the other. Earlier this month, Polish President Karol Nawrocki suggested that Poland should develop its own nuclear weapons program.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the Munich Security Conference in mid-February that he had discussed EU-level nuclear deterrence with French President Emmanuel Macron. Earlier, a senior MP from his party said Berlin should have access to French and British nuclear weapons.
https://www.rt.com/russia/632908-russia-estonia-nato-nuclear-weapons/
>One person said he didn't believe Dot Com.
oh…
so it was one person with 10 different IDs?
whatever you say
don't fret….
i never expect anyone posting on QR to admit they were wrong
the "scoop" wasn't that palantir was hacked
the "scoop" was that someone was trying to give nukes to zelenskyy
leave it to you to miss the POINT entirely
and obsess on superfluous details
Moscow will respond if NATO gives nukes to ‘Nazi regime in Kiev’ – Medvedev
France and the UK are considering covertly handing nuclear capabilities or a ‘dirty bomb’ to Kiev, Russian intel has claimed
Russia would launch a nuclear response if NATO countries supplied atomic weapons to Ukraine, former President Dmitry Medvedev has warned.
Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, was commenting to RT on Tuesday on claims by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) that London and Paris are considering ways to provide nuclear weaponry or related components to Kiev.
“I will be blunt and state the obvious,” Medvedev said, adding that the reported intention by the UK and France to hand over nuclear capabilities to the “Nazi regime in Kiev” would change the situation entirely.
“This is a direct transfer of nuclear weapons to a country at war,” he stated.
According to the SVR, British and French officials are weighing the “covert transfer of relevant European-made components, equipment, and technologies to Ukraine,” and preparing an information campaign to portray any resulting capability as domestically developed.
“There should be no doubt whatsoever that in such a scenario Russia would be forced to use any means at its disposal, including non-strategic nuclear weapons, against targets in Ukraine that threaten our country,” Medvedev stated. “And if necessary, against the supplier nations now implicated in a nuclear conflict with Russia. This is the kind of symmetrical response that the Russian Federation would be entitled to,” he added.
The SVR also alleged that another option under discussion was the provision of a complete French TN 75 nuclear warhead used on submarine launched ballistic missiles, or assistance in building a radioactive “dirty bomb” using conventional explosives and nuclear materials. Kiev could seek “more advantageous terms” in any negotiations if it possessed such weapons, the SVR suggested, adding that Germany had “prudently refused” to participate.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the reported plans as “potentially very dangerous,” saying they would threaten the global non-proliferation regime.
Ukraine has argued that it gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees that later proved worthless. While a significant portion of Soviet nuclear forces were stationed in Ukraine, Kiev never controlled the missiles.
The 1994 Budapest Memorandums provided assurances – but not legally binding guarantees – to Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan that their territorial integrity would be respected after transferring Soviet nuclear weapons to Russia. At the 2022 Munich Security Conference, shortly before the Ukraine conflict escalated, Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky suggested Kiev could reconsider its non-nuclear status.
Moscow maintains that after the 2014 Western-backed coup in Kiev, Ukraine’s new authorities breached the neutrality pledge underpinning its post-Soviet independence by making NATO membership a key foreign policy goal.
https://www.rt.com/news/632966-russia-response-ukraine-nukes/
>You can apply this even to your home
handwritten documents and 35mm photos stored in a metal file cabinet
analog is king, baby
Moscow warns of ‘direct conflict’ between nuclear powers
The alleged plans by France and the UK to supply Kiev with nuclear weapons bear “catastrophic” risks, the Russian Foreign Ministry has said
Any attempt to provide Ukraine with nuclear capabilities would be met with a “resolute response” from Russia and risks a “direct military conflict between nuclear powers,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said.
Zakharova made the remarks on Tuesday, commenting on claims made by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) earlier in the day. It alleged that London and Paris have been considering ways to equip Ukraine with nuclear capabilities, either by providing it with components to build dirty bombs or supplying it with warheads from their own stocks.
The potential “covert transfer of relevant European-made components, equipment, and technologies to Ukraine” comes along with preparations for an information campaign to portray the nuclear device as domestically developed in Ukraine.
The alleged intentions of Paris and London bear grave risks for global security and would “inevitably be met with a resolute response” from Russia, Zakharova said in a statement.
“We have repeatedly stated that any attempts to revisit Ukraine’s non-nuclear status, let alone to enable the deeply anti-Russian Kiev regime to obtain nuclear weapons, are categorically unacceptable,” she said. “We once again warn of the risks of direct military conflict between nuclear powers – and, consequently, of its potentially catastrophic consequences.”
The allegations raised by the SVR “fall upon fertile ground,” Zakharova said, citing repeated belligerent remarks by the Ukrainian leadership.
“Evidence of Kiev’s nuclear ambitions is plentiful. One need only recall Vladimir Zelensky’s remarks at the 2022 Munich Security Conference, in which he expressed readiness to reconsider Ukraine’s non-nuclear status, as well as his subsequent, equally provocative statements on the matter,” she stated.
The Ukrainian leadership has repeatedly claimed that it gave up its nuclear arsenal in the early 1990s in exchange for security guarantees. In reality, the arsenal was mere leftovers of the Soviet-era nuclear stockpile, which ended up in Ukraine after the collapse of the USSR. The nuclear weapons in question remained under the control of Russia, which is the only legal successor of the Soviet Union.
https://www.rt.com/russia/632995-ukraine-direct-nuclear-conflict/
also, much more difficult to plant kiddie porn
UK and French Elites Cynically Turning Europe Into Nuclear Testing Ground
The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) said that the UK and France are preparing to transfer nuclear weapons to Ukraine.
The UK and France’s plan to transfer atomic weapons to Ukraine is a blatant act of nuclear blackmail aimed at Russia, Alexander Stepanov, a military expert at the Institute of Law and National Security at the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), tells Sputnik.
"Western elites are cynically turning Europe into a testing ground for nuclear disaster, ignoring that triggering such a scenario would automatically activate strategic deterrence doctrines and guarantee the destruction of the threat’s source," Stepanov says.
He lays out the options the Ukraine regime has on the table:
a "dirty bomb" – radiological weapons capable of contaminating targeted areas
TN75 warheads from France’s M51.1 submarine-launched ballistic missile with a yield of 100–110 kilotons
warheads from a British-modified Trident intercontinental missile (Holbrook variant) with a yield of up to 100 kilotons
'Ukrainian Dirty Bomb Could Be Ready Soon'
Ukraine’s tech base spans the Kharkov Physical-Technical Institute and spent nuclear fuel stocks at active nuclear reactors and Chernobyl
Ukraine could pair isotopes like cesium-137 or cobalt-60 with delivery systems already in its arsenal: upgraded Neptune missiles, Storm Shadow and ATACMS
"The exposure of [the UK and France’s] intentions and the launch of organizational planning to deliver [nuclear] munitions to [Ukraine] clearly signal a political decision to push the escalation into an uncontrollable phase," warns the pundit.
What Risks Does This Entail?
Trashing of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
A dangerous slide into nuclear anarchy, with unchecked spread of materials and warheads
Could spiral the escalation into a direct Russia–NATO conflict
"If the situation escalates into a direct NATO–Russia conflict, Europe — with its dense infrastructure and major urban centers — would no longer exist as we know it," Stepanov concludes.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20260225/uk-and-french-elites-cynically-turning-europe-into-nuclear-testing-ground—expert-1123688723.html
Russian Intel’s Exposure of Plans to Give Ukraine Nuclear Arms Prevented Catastrophe
The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) said that the UK and France are preparing to transfer nuclear weapons to Ukraine.
The release of information by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) regarding the potential transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine should nullify even the very idea of this global provocation and the ensuing world catastrophe, Russian military analyst and editor-in-chief of National Defense magazine, Igor Korotchenko, told Sputnik.
On Tuesday, the SVR stated that the Western plot involves the covert transfer of European components, equipment, and technologies related to nuclear arms. One possibility is the French TN75 compact warhead from the M51.1 submarine-launched ballistic missile.
"The publication of this information by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, which is obviously based on real intelligence sources in several Western countries, including London and Paris, allows us to hope that this Anglo-French initiative will not come to fruition. Ultimately, France and the UK will abandon this provocative idea. We also expect that the United States will take the necessary measures to pressure President Macron and Prime Minister Starmer to prevent such a scenario," Korotchenko said.
In his opinion, from a technical standpoint, there are no problems with transferring a nuclear warhead from one of the French nuclear technical bases to Ukraine. He also believes that the likely delivery vehicle for such a warhead could be the Flamingo cruise missile, a joint Ukrainian-British development.
The plans of London and Paris to help Ukraine with nuclear weapons is a manipulation, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Wednesday.
"The UK and France are preparing and are already in the process of manipulating, not rhetorically, but practically, the issue of nuclear weapons," Zakharova told Sputnik Radio.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20260225/russian-intels-exposure-of-plans-to-give-ukraine-nuclear-arms-prevented-catastrophe–expert-1123687125.html