>>24316451 pb

>Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of this case possible???

President Trump:

Notice"Is a"

The Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026, in a 6-3 decision, that President Donald Trump could not use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping global tariffs without congressional approval. The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs, stating the law contains no reference to tariffs or duties and that the power to tax—central to tariff imposition—resides with Congress.

United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936) established the principle that the President is the "sole organ" of the federal government in international relations, granting the executive broad, inherent authority in foreign affairs independent of congressional approval.

The Supreme Court ruled that the President's power in foreign affairs is plenary and exclusive, meaning it does not require an act of Congress to be exercised, though it must still comply with the Constitution.

A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on goods imported from other countries, and only the POTUS has foreign charters not the legislative nor the judicial branch. Important: Congress only has say in domestic taxation and not international agreements.

The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs, stating the law contains no reference to tariffs or duties and that the power to tax—central to tariff imposition (word game: is a)—resides with Congress.

IEEPA doesn't have to restate the law, because the right to tariff belong to the POTUS as the sole organizer. A tax is a charge, there are domestic and international charges. They are playing word games central meaning a tariff is a tax but there is a charter for Congress = domestic and POTUS = international. There does not need to be a reference because we already have precedents in United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.

Under IEEPA, the president can block transactions, freeze foreign assets, and regulate economic activities related to foreign interests. However, the law does not explicitly authorize the imposition of tariffs.

A tariff "is a" economic regulation is it not? The law does not have to explicitly authorize the imposition of tariffs because it is encapsulated in the term "economical regulation" and the POTUS has been given plenary powers in Curtiss-Wright Export Corp already. The IEEPA doesn't have to reiterate all powers that have already been known and exercised, just address novelty.

See how they read the board when I described tariffs as a tax or duty and made their rulings by making word games?Is a

>>24317062Games

>The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs,

Because it does not have to restate known laws, precedents, and the plenary power of the POTUS to impose tariffs. If that was the case, every law would have restate every other law in an endless loop of recursion to include all laws. A law is about novelty not reiterations and the courts know that. Game.

>stating the law contains no reference to tariffs or duties a

Again, the law does not have to reference tariffs, taxes, or duties because those are Presidential Powers already known and exercised and areencapsulatedin ''economic regulation". Game

>and that the power to tax—central to tariff imposition—resides with Congress.

This is another game of "Is a" which is types and subtypes. The type "tax" is coarse grained termed encapsulating a charge. The subtypes of tax is a certain type of tax, like Federal Tax, Social Security Tax, State Tax, Tobacco Tax, or a Tariff. Some of these taxes are by States or by the POTUS, so resides with Congress is a word game of a half truth as some tax authority resides with Congress and others don't.

1. and that the power to tax (Verb)

2. —central to tariff imposition— (Type Tax encapsulating Subtype Tariff)

3. resides with Congress. (Game of encapsulation)

We use subtypes tospecifythe specification of a subtype that separates it from the known parent type to address certain criteria. We do this because we inherit all the parent attributes, in this case a tax, while creating fine grained details of the subtype and it's attributes, in this case a tariff is a type tax which is a charge, but it's sole organizer is the POTUS, which overrides sole organ and it's charter is international which overrides it's scope of authority. Therefore subtype tariff cannot be imposed on individual domestic entities such as people or corporations. Word Games.

>>24317062

>>24317195

Amazing I cannot link to even my own posts. I caught them in their game, that is why. I just do not understand why no one gives a …., we are only talking about trillions of dollars.