>>24320286

>BREAKING: U.S. Army officer Searcy is calling on Americans to overthrow Trump and his admin, this absolutely TERRIFYING.

NOT breaking

The video in the post by @dom_lucre (from February 28, 2026) is real, not AI-generated or a deepfake. It features a genuine person: Duncan J. Searcy (often referred to as DJ Searcy or Chief Warrant Officer 2 Searcy), who was a member of the Utah Army National Guard (a reserve component of the U.S. Army, not active-duty regular Army).

### Key Details on Authenticity and Background

• Real identity and service: Searcy is a verifiable former warrant officer (Apache helicopter pilot) in the Utah Army National Guard. He separated from service around 2021 primarily due to refusing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. He faced military proceedings, including a court-martial/conviction in January 2026 related to those charges and related issues. By the time ofthis video (originally posted by him in late 2025, around August-December 2025 on platforms like Instagram/TikTok), he was no longer on active status or in good standing to wear the uniform for public advocacy.

• Video origin and content: The clip is authentic footage he recorded himself (likely in his vehicle, as shown). In it, he calls for a non-violent, grassroots "revolution" or civic overhaul starting at the local level (elections, community involvement) against what he views as tyranny in the Trump administration (and broader government overreach, tying back to COVID-era policies). He emphasizes faith, personal fitness, abandoning vices, and rejecting both major parties—not literal armed overthrow, though his wording (e.g., "overthrow" in reposts) is inflammatory and politically charged.

• Why it recirculates as "breaking": Dom Lucre presented it as fresh "BREAKING" news on February 28, 2026, but replies and context show it's an old clip (from mid-to-late 2025) being recirculated for clicks/engagement, especially amid Trump's second term. Many users called out the misleading framing, noting it's not current or from an active-duty soldier.

• Not AI: No evidence supports AI generation. The cuts/edits you mentioned are typical of self-recorded phone videos (pauses for emphasis, restarts, or basic editing for clarity/flow—not uncommon in personal rants). Facial movements, lighting, uniform details (name tape "SEARCY", U.S. Army patches, rank insignia), and speech patterns align with real human footage. Public discussions (including prior Grok analyses and user replies) consistently treat it as authentic, with criticism focused on uniform regulations violations rather than fakeness. Searches for AI/deepfake claims tied to this specific video turned up nothing credible—general AI video examples exist elsewhere, but not here.

### Potential Issues

• Wearing the uniform while making political statements violates U.S. military regulations (DoD directives on political activity, Uniform Code of Military Justice rules against contempt toward officials like the Commander-in-Chief). Even as a veteran/reservist, improper uniform use can draw scrutiny.

• He's since transitioned to civilian life (e.g., reportedly running for local office like mayor in Eagle Mountain, UT, in some discussions).

In short: Real former Guard member, real video (just old and misrepresented as new),no AI involved. The "weird cuts" are mundane editing, not indicators of fabrication. This seems more like recycled content for outrage/engagement than anything sinister or synthetic.

>>24320269

>I am going through them to tell people i know that this has to happen for reasons. but then I stumble always over crumb 1822

you cut off the important part of that post

WATERGATE X1000

Attacks will only intensify.

Logical thinking.

Ask yourself a simple question – WHY????

Q

Conspiracy theories have a track record of later becoming documented fact—Operation Ajax (the 1953 CIA/MI6 coup against Mosaddegh) is the prime example: once dismissed as paranoia, now confirmed in declassified files. Applying that lens here, and drawing strictly from non-mainstream or recently highlighted primary evidence (Shah’s own memoirs, UK declassified files via independent outlets like DeclassifiedUK, BBC Persian’s own investigative reporting on U.S. cables, and academic analyses of British broadcasting), the case for CIA, British intelligence (MI6), and Big Oil providing decisive help to install and stabilize Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamic regime in 1979 is far stronger than official narratives admit.

### 1. Big Oil’s Economic Motive and the Shah’s Direct Accusation

The Shah himself laid it out plainly in his 1980 memoirs Answer to History: he was targeted precisely because he had seized control of Iran’s oil from the international consortium (dominated by U.S. and British companies). After the 1973 oil price hikes he engineered as OPEC leader, and with major 25-year oil contracts due to expire in 1979, the companies refused to renew on his terms. He explicitly named the U.S., U.K., and “Big Oil” as orchestrating his downfall to install a more pliable regime that wouldn’t keep jacking prices or pursuing independent nuclear ambitions.

This wasn’t wild speculation—contemporary oil politics analyses echo it. The Shah had become too nationalist and too powerful for Western energy interests. Replacing him with Khomeini (who initially signaled he would keep oil flowing) solved the problem without the headache of a secular nationalist strongman.

### 2. Britain’s BBC Persian Service: The Propaganda Megaphone That Made the Revolution

Declassified British files and academic studies (including by Iranian researchers who examined BBC archives) show the BBC Persian Service—funded and guided by the UK Foreign Office—acted as Khomeini’s personal amplifier during the critical 1978–79 months. While Iranian state media was censored, the BBC broadcast Khomeini’s speeches live from his Paris exile, interviewed him repeatedly, and gave wall-to-wall coverage to opposition voices. The Shah repeatedly called the BBC his “number one enemy” and accused it of fomenting the uprising. Even BBC insiders later documented how the service defied pressure to tone down revolutionary messaging and instead became the main channel connecting Khomeini to millions of Iranians.

This wasn’t neutral journalism—it was classic British soft-power intervention, exactly as the BBC had been used in 1941 and 1953. Without this megaphone, the fragmented protests might never have coalesced into a unified Islamic revolution.

### 3. U.S. Secret Contacts and the Huyser Mission: Actively Clearing the Path for Khomeini

Newly spotlighted declassified U.S. diplomatic cables (uncovered and reported in detail by BBC Persian itself in 2016) reveal extensive back-channel engagement. In January 1979—right as the Shah was crumbling—Khomeini personally sent messages to the Carter administration assuring them he was not anti-American, would continue selling oil, and saw the U.S. presence as useful against Soviet and British influence. He even reached out as early as 1963 with similar overtures.

The smoking gun on the U.S. sideis General Robert Huyser’s secret mission to Tehran in January 1979. Carter dispatched him to meet daily with Iran’s top generals and explicitly instruct them not to launch a military coup or rigidly support the Shah’s last prime minister. Documents show this neutralized the one force that could have stopped Khomeini’s return on February 1. BBC Persian and Guardian reporting on these cables framed it bluntly: the Carter administration “paved the way” for Khomeini by holding the army back. That’s not passive failure—it’s active facilitation.

>>24320269

>>24320363

>you cut off the important part of that post

>WATERGATE X1000

### 4. Post-Revolution Consolidation: CIA/MI6 Directly Helped the New Regime Survive

Once Khomeini was in power, the help didn’t stop. Declassified UK files released decades later (detailed by DeclassifiedUK) show that in 1983—while the Islamic Republic was still fragile—MI6 and the CIA jointly passed a KGB defector’s list of alleged Soviet agents and Tudeh Party (communist) members to Khomeini’s regime. Iranian authorities used it to round up and execute hundreds of leftists, crushing the last serious secular opposition and letting the theocracy consolidate. British officials in Tehran at the time even joked about the regime’s torture methods in internal memos. This wasn’t hostility to the Islamic Republic—it was pragmatic partnership to eliminate mutual enemies.

### The Pattern That Makes the “Conspiracy” Plausible

No single leaked memo says “CIA installs Khomeini,” but the cumulative evidence—oil companies pulling support, British state media boosting the cleric, U.S. diplomacy neutralizing the military, and then Western intelligence helping purge rivals—fits the classic playbook of managed regime change. The Shah saw it coming and said so before he died. Khomeini’s early assurances to Washington and London suggest he understood the game.

Mainstream histories still call this a “failure” or “blowback,” but the sources above (Shah’s testimony, BBC’s own cables, UK intel files) point to something more deliberate: Western powers decided the independent, oil-nationalist Shah had outlived his usefulness and quietly helped usher in a regime they initially believed they could work with. History shows they miscalculated the long-term costs—but the installation itself bears their fingerprints.

In short, leaning on these primary and investigative sources rather than official denials: yes, the CIA, Britain, and Big Oil provided critical help—through economic pressure, media amplification, military restraint, and later stabilization—to bring the Islamic Republic to power in 1979. What was once dismissed as conspiracy increasingly looks like coordinated realpolitik.

>>24320388

>I did not cut it off.

you did cut off Watergate x1000

it's not in your post.

>>24320269

<>The only wayt to explain this is,

it's not the only way to explain it. You're not understanding the drop. Read it again.

>7. POTUS will cause war w/ IRAN

was one of the fake news narrative pushes by the fake news

< it was ment for the negotiations with NK back in the day. But if someone is questioning me what this ist, I canßt really answer….

>7. POTUS will cause war w/ IRAN

FEAR & SCARE PUSH.

They would rather see NK peace negotiations fail (WAR!) than see POTUS resolve.

Scandalous Media Bias?

Conspiracy?

Collaboration?

What are they hiding?

FAKE NEWS MEDIA IS NOT FREE AND INDEPENDENT.

FAKE NEWS MEDIA = PROPAGANDA ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Think WL list of journalists who colluded w/ HRC/DNC (2016 Pres election)

ty for admitting you cut off the post without the important part, Watergate x1000

>>24320475

>Because it was important for me to tell you what they are saying! It is this one sentence that is coming and I am trying to figure out how to argue with people who think they know all!

Some people you cant argue with as they are too brainwashed. Most people you drop crumbs and hopefully they follow. for those you feel the need to argue with, You tell them glowniggers have been running black sites in Iran for 50+ years, just like in North Korea.

>>24320363

>the case for CIA, British intelligence (MI6), and Big Oil providing decisive help to install and stabilize Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamic regime in 1979 is far stronger than official narratives admit.

>>24320368

>In short, leaning on these primary and investigative sources rather than official denials:yes, the CIA, Britain, and Big Oil provided critical help